Experimental Economics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 180–192

Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion

Authors

    • Institut d’Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC)
  • Navin Kartik
    • University of California
    • Economics DepartmentColumbia University
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10683-008-9208-2

Cite this article as:
Hurkens, S. & Kartik, N. Exp Econ (2009) 12: 180. doi:10.1007/s10683-008-9208-2

Abstract

This paper reinterprets the evidence on lying or deception presented in Gneezy (Am. Econ. Rev. 95(1):384–394, 2005). We show that Gneezy’s data are consistent with the simple hypothesis that people are one of two kinds: either a person will never lie, or a person will lie whenever she prefers the outcome obtained by lying over the outcome obtained by telling the truth. This implies that so long as lying induces a preferred outcome over truth-telling, a person’s decision of whether to lie may be completely insensitive to other changes in the induced outcomes, such as exactly how much she monetarily gains relative to how much she hurts an anonymous partner. We run new but broadly similar experiments to those of Gneezy in order to test this hypothesis. While we also confirm that there is an aversion to lying in our subject population, our data cannot reject the simple hypothesis described above either.

Keywords

Experimental economicsLyingDeceptionSocial preferences

JEL Classification

C91

Supplementary material

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2008