The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this paper we study the effect of downward social information in contribution decisions to fund public goods. We describe the results of a field experiment run in conjunction with the fundraising campaigns of a public radio station. Renewing members are presented with social information (information about another donor’s contribution) which is either above or below their previous (last year’s) contribution. We find that respondents change their contribution in the direction of the social information; increasing their contribution when the social information is above their previous contribution, and decreasing their contribution when the social information is below. We hypothesize about the psychological motivations that may cause the results and test these hypotheses by comparing the relative size of the upward and downward shifts. These results improve our understanding of cooperation in public good provision and suggest differential costs and benefits to fundraisers in providing social information.
- Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458. CrossRef
- Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464–477. CrossRef
- Andreoni, J. (2004). Philanthropy. In L.-A. Gerard-Varet, S.-C. Kolm, & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbooks in economics : Vol. 18. The handbook of giving, reciprocity and altruism (pp. 1201–1269). Amsterdam: North Holland.
- Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093. CrossRef
- Bryan, J., & Test, M. (1967). Models and helping: naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 6, 400–407. CrossRef
- Croson, R., Handy, F., & Shang, J. (2006). The relationship between norms, social information and subsequent giving: results from a donor survey and a lab experiment (Working paper). University of Texas at Dallas.
- Davis, D., & Holt, C. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Dawes, R. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. CrossRef
- Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2005). Subsidizing charitable contributions: a field test comparing matching and rebate subsidies (Working paper). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Station University.
- Falk, A. (2005). Charitable giving as a gift exchange: evidence from a field experiment (Working paper). University of Bonn.
- Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. CrossRef
- Fischbacher, U., Gaechter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404. CrossRef
- Frey, B., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing ‘conditional cooperation’ in a field experiment. American Economic Review, 94, 1717–1722. CrossRef
- Giving USA. (2006). American Association of Fundraising Counsel, Glenview, IL.
- LaTour, S. A., & Manrai, A. K. (1989). Interactive impact of informational and normative influence on donations. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 327–335. CrossRef
- Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth, (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 2, pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- List, J. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 482–493. CrossRef
- List, J., & Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 215–233. CrossRef
- Levitt, S., & List, J. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174. CrossRef
- Reingen, P. H. (1978). On inducing compliance with requests. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 96–102. CrossRef
- Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2004). Global Civil society: an overview. In L. M. Salamon & S. W. Sokolowski (Eds.), Global Civil society: dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2, pp. 33–90). Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
- Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2006). The impact of social comparisons on nonprofit fundraising. Research in Experimental Economics, 11, 143–156. CrossRef
- Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2007). Field experiments in charitable contribution: the impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods (Working paper). University of Texas at Dallas.
- Shang, J., Reed, A., & Croson, R. (2008, forthcoming). Identity-based gender congruency effect on donations. Journal of Marketing Research.
- Sargeant, A. (1999). Charitable giving; towards a model of giving behavior. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 212–238. CrossRef
- Sugden, R. (1984). Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions. Economic Journal, 94, 772–787. CrossRef
- Weyant, J. (1996). Application of compliance techniques to direct-mail request for charitable donation. Psychology and Marketing, 13, 157–170. CrossRef
- The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions
Volume 11, Issue 3 , pp 221-233
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Social influence
- Social information
- Social comparison
- Charitable giving
- Public goods
- Industry Sectors