Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 727–738

Intersexual niche segregation in Cepero’s Ground-hopper, Tetrix ceperoi

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10682-006-9147-3

Cite this article as:
Hochkirch, A., Gröning, J. & Krause, S. Evol Ecol (2007) 21: 727. doi:10.1007/s10682-006-9147-3

Abstract

Sexual differences in habitat preferences have been reported from a variety of animal taxa. However, the ultimate causes for this intersexual niche segregation remain poorly understood. It has been suggested that sexual dimorphism is a consequence of dimorphic niches based upon different reproductive costs and activities of the sexes. Here we provide evidence from field data to examine this hypothesis by studying the behavioral background of niche segregation in Tetrix ceperoi. Our data revealed distinct sexual differences in the substrates on which the insects perched and in the solar radiation of these locations. Males were found at brighter locations and more often on bare ground than females. Incorporation of behavioral data in our analysis showed that patches of bare ground were mainly utilized during mating behavior, in which males invested more time than females. In contrast, females spent more time resting and feeding in the vegetation. Intersexual differences in the proportion of autotomized individuals indicate that males might suffer higher predation risks. These patterns support the dimorphic niches hypothesis, which suggests that differential habitat utilization is caused by differences in the life history strategies of males and females, since males should accept a higher predation risk due to the benefits of multiple matings. Females should invest more time in gaining nutrients and energy for egg production and survival, whereas males should spend more time with searching for mates. We suggest that behavioral covariates should more often be implemented in ecological analyses, since these might have a strong explanatory power.

Keywords

Sexual dimorphismMicrohabitat choiceIntersexual competitionHabitat preferencesSexual selection

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology and Chemistry, Division of EcologyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Department of Biogeochemistry Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial MicrobiologyMarburgGermany