Skip to main content
Log in

Size dependent predation risk in cryptic and conspicuous insects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is not clear which selective pressures balance the strong fecundity advantage associated with large female body size in insects. A positively size-dependent mortality risk could provide a solution. In aviary experiments with artificial larvae, we studied if larger larvae of folivorous insects are more readily found (= detectability) and/or attacked (= acceptability) by birds. As size and colouration are likely to interact in determining birds’ responses, both cryptic and conspicuous prey items were used. As detectability is likely to be context-dependent, both simple (smooth) and complex (plants) backgrounds were used in respective experiments. In the conspicuous larvae, acceptability correlated negatively with prey size. However, their detectability was context dependent, being positively correlated with size on the simple background, whereas no significant effect was found on the complex background. Surprisingly, cryptic larvae showed no correlation between detectability and size, and there was only a weak tendency for birds to attack large larvae more readily. On the basis of a quantitative model, we conclude that the effect of positively size dependent bird predation, as a single factor, is not likely to counterbalance the fecundity advantage in cryptic species, and may thus not be crucial in determining the optimum for body sizes in these insects. In conspicuous species, there is a potential for different outcomes, because detectability and acceptability affect survival in different directions. The net outcome is, therefore, likely to be highly context-dependent. Furthermore, our results provide an explanation for the recently reported absence of systematic body-size differences between cryptic and conspicuous Lepidopteran larvae: although conspicuous larvae benefit from increasing their warning signal when growing larger, they also suffer a much sharper rise in detectability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RR (1970) Bird predation as a selective pressure on the immature stages of the cabbage butterflies, Pieris rapae and P. brassicae. J Zool Lond 162:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Singer M (2002) Contrasting foraging tactics in two species of polyphagous caterpillars. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 48:117–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol 75:385–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Church SC, Jowers M, Allen JA (1997) Does prey dispersion affect frequency-dependent predation by wild birds? Oecologia 111:292–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogni R, Freitas AVL, Filho BFA (2002) Influence of prey size on predation success by Zelus longipes L. (Het., Reduviidae). J Appl Entomol 126:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell HV, Hawkins BA (1995) Survival patterns and mortality sources of herbivorous insects: Some demographic trends. Am Nat 145:563–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster JP (1984) The natural enemies of butterflies. In: The biology of butterflies: symposium of the Royal Society of London, vol 11. Academic, London, pp 97–104

  • Dyer LA (1995) Tasty generalists and nasty specialists? A comparative study of antipredator mechanisms in tropical lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 76:1483–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1988) Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 319:505–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Mappes J (2004) Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Am Nat 163:532–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esperk T, Tammaru T (2004) Does the “investment principle” model explain moulting strategies in Lepidopteran larvae? Physiol Entomol 29:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman A, Merilaita S (1999) Fearful symmetry: pattern size and asymmetry affects aposematic signal efficacy. Evol Ecol 13:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale G, Tullberg BS (1996) Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1329–1334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamberale G, Tullberg BS (1998) Aposematism and gregariousness: the combined effect of group size and colouration on signal repellence. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:889–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco F (2002) Time constraint on food choice in provisioning blue tits, Parus caeruleus: the relationship between feeding rate and prey size. Anim Behav 64:517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotthard K (2004) Growth strategies and optimal body size in temperate Pararginii butterflies. Integr Comp Biol 44:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grushecky ST, Liebhold AM, Greer R, Smith RL (1998) Does forest thinning affect predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae and pupae? Environ Entomol 27:268–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagman M, Forsman A (2003) Correlated evolution of conspicuous coloration and body size in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae). Evolution 57:2904–2910

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry CJ, Day KR (2001) Egg allocation by Bracon hylobii Ratz., the principal parasitoid of the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.), and implications for host suppression. Agric Forest Entomol 3:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honěk A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter AF (2000) Gregariousness and repellent defences in the survival of phytophagous insects. Oikos 91:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimar O (1996) Life history plasticity: influence of fotoperiod on growth and development in the common blue butterfly. Oikos 76:228–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J (1999a) Reactions of hand-reared and wild-caught predators toward warningly colored, gregarious, and conspicuous prey. Behav Ecol 10:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Riipi M, Vertainen L (1999b) Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change? Nature 397:249–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström L, Rowe C, Guilford T (2001) Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 268:159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS System for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund JR (2002) SAS for linear models, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Mappes J, Alatalo RV (1997) Effects of novelty and gregariousness in survival of aposematic prey. Behav Ecol 8:174–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes J, Marples N, Endler JA (2005) The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol Evol (in press)

  • Marples NM, Roper TJ (1996) Effects of novel colour and smell on the response of naive chicks towards food and water. Anim Behav 51:1417–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples NM, Kelly DJ, Thomas RJ (2005) Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Evolution 59:933–940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merilaita S, Lyytinen A, Mappes J (2001) Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogeneous habitat. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JH, Smith JNM (1978) Head flicking by tent caterpillars: a defensive response to parasite sounds. Can J Zool 56:1628–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M, Forsman A (2003) Evolution of conspicuous colouration, body size and gregariousness: a comparative analysis of lepidopteran larvae. Evol Ecol 17:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen M, Mappes J (2005) Significance of the dorsal zigzag pattern of Vipera latastei gaditana against avian predators. J Anim Ecol 74:1091–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira FB (2005) Body-size influence on defensive behaviour of Amazonian moths: an ecophysiological approach. Braz J boil 65:101–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton EB (1890) The colours of animals. Their meaning and use. Especially considered in the case of insects. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co. Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Riipi M, Alatalo RV, Lindström L, Mappes J (2001) Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations. Nature 413:512–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe CL, Guilford T (1996) Hidden colour aversions of domestic chicks triggered by pyrazine odours of insect warning displays. Nature 383:520–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler W, Hesse E (1985) On the function of warning colouration: a black and yellow pattern inhibits prey-attack by naļve domestic chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammaru T, Haukioja E (1996) Capital breeders and income breeders among Lepidoptera: consequences to population dynamics. Oikos 77:561–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammaru T, Kaitaniemi P, Ruohomäki K (1996) Realized fecundity in Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): relation to body size and consequences to population dynamics. Oikos 77:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammaru T (1998) Determination of adult size in a folivorous moth: constraints at instar level? Ecol Entomol 23:80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammaru T, Esperk T, Castellanos I (2002) No evidence for costs of being large in females of Orgyia spp. (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae): larger is always better. Oecologia 133:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teder T, Tammaru T (2001) Larger larvae of a flush-feeding moth are not at a higher parasitism risk: implications for host life-history. Eur J Entomol 98:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullberg BS Merilaita S, Wiklund C (2005) Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the wallowtail butterfly larva. Proc R Soc B 272:1315–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varley GC, Gradwell GR, Hassell MP (1973) Insect population ecology: an analytical approach. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij GJ (1982) Unsuccessful predation and evolution. Am Nat 120:701–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh RM (1990) Estimation of predation rates of gypsy moth larvae by exposure of tethered caterpillars. Environ Entomol 19:448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaviezo T, Mills NJ (2000) Factors influencing the evolution of clutch size in a gregarious insect parasitoid. J Anim Ecol 69:1047–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Wolf Blanckenhorn, John Endler, Peeter Hõrak, Lauri Saks, and the anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. We are also grateful to the members of Nigula Nature Reserve administration, especially Agu Leivits, and several voluntary assistants at Kabli Bird Station, as well as Helinä Nisu and the staff at Konnevesi Research Station for assistance in technical issues. The study was financed by Estonian Science Foundation grant # 5746, and the Centre for International Mobility (Finland).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Triinu Mänd.

Additional information

Estonian Science Foundation grant # 5746; Centre for International Mobility (Finland).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mänd, T., Tammaru, T. & Mappes, J. Size dependent predation risk in cryptic and conspicuous insects. Evol Ecol 21, 485–498 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9130-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9130-z

Keywords

Navigation