Skip to main content
Log in

The cultivation revival of a landrace: pedigree and analytical breeding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at improving the legume landrace Fava Santorinis (Lathyrus sp.) through the study of the existing variability, and an intra-landrace pedigree, combined with analytical selection, scheme. The experiments were conducted at the farm of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki during five growing seasons (2005–2009), and the selection was applied on a spaced plant conditions. In the first stage, single-plant frequency distributions of the source landrace for grain yield and pod number plant−1 was studied, and a percentage of 60.80% of non productive plants was found. In the second stage, improvement of grain yield relied on direct pedigree selection, accomplished by analytical selection for the number of pods plant−1, plant leaf color and vigor. This procedure was followed along the first generation progenies, and, later on, along two successive generations on the offsprings of two populations, one with purple and the other with white flower color. In the third stage, the evaluation of the fourth-generation progenies of each population for grain yield, showed superiority ranging from 42.48 to 107.89% compared to the source landrace. Furthermore, the breeding procedure succeeded in: (i) decreasing the coefficient of variability of grain yield and pods plant−1, thus increasing the stability of performance, (ii) reducing by 56.41 and 39.67% the non productive plants for white and purple flower populations, respectively, and (iii) maintaining the mean and the variability for pod traits as in the original landrace. Realized heritability for grain yield was positive during all selection cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annicchiarico P (1995) Relationships between phenotypic variation and climatic factors at collecting sites in durum wheat landraces. Hereditas 122:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Peccetti L (1998) Yield vs morphophysiological trait-based criteria for selection of durum wheat in a semi-arid Mediterranean region (northern Syria). Field Crops Res 59:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batzios DP, Roupakias DG (1997) HONEY: a microcomputer program for plant selection and analyses of the honeycomb designs. Crop Sci 37:744–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Brahum N, Combes D, Marrakchi W (2001) Autogamy and allogamy in genus Lathyrus. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 2:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho Villa TC, Maxted N, Scholten MA, Ford-Lloyd BJ (2006) Defining and identifying crop landraces. P Gen Res 3:373–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S (1989) Efficiency of empirical selection under stress conditions in barley. J Genet Breed 43:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Van Leur JAG (1987) Genetic diversity in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Euphytica 36:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Acevedo E, Grando St (1991) Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM, Hamblin J (1976) The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv Agron 28:361–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (1977) Genetic rates of gain in hybrid maize yields during the past 40 years. Maydica 22:187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvick DN (1984) Genetic contributions to yield gains of U.S. hybrid maize, 1930 to 1980. In: Fehr WR (ed) Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants. CSSA Special Publication No. 7, Crop Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp 15–47

  • Edmeades GO, Daynard TB (1979) The relationship between final yield and photosynthesis at flowering in individual maize plants. Can J Plant Sci 59:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasoulas AC (1977) Field designs for genotypic evaluation and selection. Publication no 7, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Aristotelian University, Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Fasoulas AC, Fasoula VA (1995) Honeycomb selection designs. Plant Breed Rev 13:87–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1995) The genetic diversity of wild plants. In: Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (eds) The conservation of plant biodiversity. University Press, Cambridge, pp 10–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanidou N, Perlès C (2003) The Greek Mesolithic: problems and perspectives. The British School at Athens, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p 680

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (1989) Principles of population genetics, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, INC, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • IPGRI (2000) Descriptors for Lathyrus spp. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen TW (1976) 17000 years of Greek prehistory. Sci Am 234:76–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Traka-Mavrona E (2008) Snap bean. In: Prohens J, Nuej F (eds) Vegetables II: fabaceae, solanaceae, liliaceae and umbelliferae. Springer, pp 27–86

  • Newton AC, Akar T, Baresel JP, Bebeli PJ et al (2009) Cereal landraces: an essential resource for the future of contemporary agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev (in press)

  • Pecetti L, Boggini G, Gorham J (1994) Performance of durum wheat landraces in a Mediterranean environment (eastern Sicily). Euphytica 80:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlès C (2001) The early neolithic of Greece. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–92

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli R, Cubero JI (1997) Bases for genetic improvement of grain legumes. Field Crop Res 53:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards AJ (1997) Plant breeding systems, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London, p 529

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall F, Lehman A (1996) JMP IN, start statistics a guide to statistical and data analysis using JMP and JMP IN software. Duxburg Press, ITP, Inter. Thompson Publ. Co, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M, Wu J (1999) Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci 39:1597–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traka-Mavrona E, Georgakis D, Koutsika-Sotiriou M, Pritsa Th (2000) An integrated approach of breeding and maintaining an elite cultivar of snap bean. Agron J 92:1020–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valamoti SM (2005) Grain versus chaff: identifying a contrast between grain-rich and chaff-rich sites in the Neolithic of northern Greece. Veget Hist Archaeobot 14:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valamoti SM, Kotsakis K (2007) Transitions to agriculture in the Aegean: the archaeobotanical evidence. In: College Sue, Conolly James (eds) The origins and spread of domestic plants in southwest Asia and Europe. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp 76–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamane T (1973) Statistics. An introductory analysis, 3rd edn. Harper International edition, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Koutsika-Sotiriou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koutsika-Sotiriou, M., Mylonas, I.G., Ninou, E. et al. The cultivation revival of a landrace: pedigree and analytical breeding. Euphytica 176, 15–24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0206-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0206-z

Keywords

Navigation