Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 309–324

Horror Films and the Argument from Reactive Attitudes

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10677-012-9338-7

Cite this article as:
Woodcock, S. Ethic Theory Moral Prac (2013) 16: 309. doi:10.1007/s10677-012-9338-7
  • 753 Downloads

Abstract

Are horror films immoral? Gianluca Di Muzio argues that horror films of a certain kind are immoral because they undermine the reactive attitudes that are responsible for human agents being disposed to respond compassionately to instances of victimization. I begin with this argument as one instance of what I call the Argument from Reactive Attitudes (ARA), and I argue that Di Muzio’s attempt to identify what is morally suspect about horror films must be revised to provide the most persuasive interpretation of the ARA. I then argue that the ARA provides a compelling standard for evaluating the moral permissibility of creating and viewing horror films, yet I note that it is an exceedingly difficult practical task evaluating the risk that these films create for our reactive attitudes. My conclusion is that the ARA provides a useful way or orienting ourselves to the complicated details of evaluating the moral status of horror films.

Keywords

Applied ethicsHorror filmsReactive attitudes

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada