Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 159–174

The Difference Between Moral and Rational “Oughts”: An Expressivist Account

Authors

    • Institut für PhilosophieUniversität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10677-011-9276-9

Cite this article as:
Schulte, P. Ethic Theory Moral Prac (2012) 15: 159. doi:10.1007/s10677-011-9276-9

Abstract

Morality and rationality are both normative: the moral claim “you ought to help others” is a genuine normative judgment, as well as the rational maxim “you ought to brush your teeth twice a day”. But it seems that there is a crucial difference these two judgments. In the first part of this paper, I argue that this difference is to be understood as a difference between two kinds of normativity: demanding and recommending normativity. But the crucial task is, of course, to explain the difference. In the second part of this paper, I suggest that metaethical expressivists can provide a good explanation: by extending the analysis of ordinary (non-normative) demands and recommendations to normative judgments, they can formulate a convincing account that captures the key differences between morality and rationality.

Keywords

Metaethics Normativity Expressivism Moral judgments Rationality Speech acts

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011