Abstract
This article provides a critical assessment of some aspects of Ann Kerr and Tom Shakespeare's Genetic Politics: from eugenics to genome. In particular, I evaluate their claims: (a) that bioethics is too ‘top down’, involving normative prescriptions, whereas it should instead be ‘bottom up’ and grounded in social science; and (b) that contemporary bioethics has not dealt particularly well with people's moral concerns about eugenics. I conclude that several of Kerr and Shakespeare's criticisms are well-founded and serve as valuable reminders to the bioethics community. These include the claims: that bioethics ought not to consist entirely of applying moral theory to cases; that bioethics must take account of relevant empirical evidence; and that bioethicists should be on the look out for those subtle social forces which can undermine the voluntariness of people's choices and consents. However, we should reject some of Kerr and Shakespeare's other criticisms and I conclude (amongst other things) that even ‘mainstream’ bioethics is better able to deal with difficult issues like eugenics than Kerr and Shakespeare suggest.
References
Caplan A, McGee, G, Magnus D (1999) What’s immoral about eugenics? Br Med J 319:1284–1285
Donchin A (2001) Understanding autonomy relationally: toward a reconfiguration of bioethical principles. J Med Philos 26:365–386
Duster T (2003) Backdoor to eugenics. Routledge, London, UK
Garrard E, Wilkinson S (2003) Does bioethics need moral theory? In: Hayry M, Takala T (eds) Scratching the surface of bioethics. Rodopi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 35–45
Garrard E, Wilkinson S (2005a) Mind the gap: the use of empirical evidence in bioethics. In: Hayry M, Takala T, Herissone-Kelly P (eds) Bioethics and social reality. Rodopi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 73–87.
Garrard E, Wilkinson, S (2005b) Passive euthanasia. J Med Ethics 31:64–68
Haimes E (2002) What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations? Bioethics 16:89–113
Holm S (1995) Not just autonomy – the principles of American bioethics. J Med Ethics 21:332–338
Kerr A, Shakespeare T (2002) Genetic politics: from eugenics to genome. New Clarion Press, Cheltenham, UK
Levitt M (2003) Better together? Sociological and philosophical perspectives on bioethics. In: Hayry M, Takala T (eds) Scratching the surface of bioethics. Rodopi, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 19–27
Mackenzie C, Stoljar, N (eds) (2000) Relational autonomy: feminist essays on autonomy, agency, and social self. Oxford University Press, New York
O’Neill O (2002) Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Wilkinson S (2006) Eugenics, embryo selection and the equal value principle. Clin Ethics 1:46–51
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkinson, S. Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 10, 409–418 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9058-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9058-y