Drones, information technology, and distance: mapping the moral epistemology of remote fighting
- Mark Coeckelbergh
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Ethical reflection on drone fighting suggests that this practice does not only create physical distance, but also moral distance: far removed from one’s opponent, it becomes easier to kill. This paper discusses this thesis, frames it as a moral-epistemological problem, and explores the role of information technology in bridging and creating distance. Inspired by a broad range of conceptual and empirical resources including ethics of robotics, psychology, phenomenology, and media reports, it is first argued that drone fighting, like other long-range fighting, creates epistemic and moral distance in so far as ‘screenfighting’ implies the disappearance of the vulnerable face and body of the opponent and thus removes moral-psychological barriers to killing. However, the paper also shows that this influence is at least weakened by current surveillance technologies, which make possible a kind of ‘empathic bridging’ by which the fighter’s opponent on the ground is re-humanized, re-faced, and re-embodied. This ‘mutation’ or unintended ‘hacking’ of the practice is a problem for drone pilots and for those who order them to kill, but revealing its moral-epistemic possibilities opens up new avenues for imagining morally better ways of technology-mediated fighting.
- Arkin, R. C. (2008). Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction.
- Asaro, P. M. (2008). How just could a robot war be? In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy (pp. 50–64). Amsterdam: Ios Press.
- Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Brooks, R. (2012). What’s Not wrong with drones? Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/09/05/whats_not_wrong_with_drones.
- Bumiller, E. (2012). A day job waiting for a kill shot a world away. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/us/drone-pilots-waiting-for-a-kill-shot-7000-miles-away.html?pagewanted=all.
- Caroll, R. (2012). Drone warfare: A new generation of deadly unmanned weapons. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/02/drone-warfare-unmanned-weapons.
- Coeckelbergh, M. (2007). Imagination and principles: An essay on the role of imagination in moral reasoning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- De Cervantes, M. (1605/1615). Don Quixote (J. Ormsby 1922, Trans.). Penn State Electronic Classics, 2000.
- Dreyfus, H. L. (2001). On the internet. Londen/New York: Routledge.
- Grossman, D. (1995). On killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York/Boston/London: Little, Brown & Company. revised edition 2009.
- Grossman, D. (2001). On killing. II: The psychological cost of learning to kill. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 3(3), 137–144.
- Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In M. Heidegger (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.) New York: Harper & Row.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Levinas, E. (1961). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press.
- Lin, P., Bekey, G., & Abney, K. (2008). Autonomous military robotics: Risk, ethics, and design. Report for the US Department of Navy, Office of Naval Research.
- Protevi, J. (2008). Affect, agency and responsibility: The act of killing in the age of cyborgs. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 405–413. CrossRef
- Rorty, R. (1993). Human rights, rationality, and sentimentality. In S. Shute & S. Hurley (Eds.), On human rights. New York: Basic Books.
- Sharkey, N. (2012). Killing made easy: From joysticks to politics. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 111–128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Singer, P. W. (2009). Military robots and the laws of war. The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society, 23(Winter issue), 28–47.
- Sparrow, R. (2007). Killer robots. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1), 62–77. CrossRef
- Sparrow, R. (2009). Building a better warbot: Ethical issues in the design of unmanned systems for military applications. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15, 169–187. CrossRef
- Stewart, P. (2011). Overstretched U.S. Drone pilots face stress risk. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/18/us-usa-drones-stress-idUSTRE7BH0VH20111218.
- Sullins, J. (2010). RoboWarfare: Can robots be more ethical than humans on the battlefield? Ethics and Information Technology, 12(3), 263–275. CrossRef
- Takaki, R. (1995). Hiroshima: Why America dropped the atomic bomb. New York: Little, Brown & Company.
- Valdes, R. (2012). How the predator UAV works. HowStuffWorks. Retrieved from http://science.howstuffworks.com/predator4.htm/printable.
- Drones, information technology, and distance: mapping the moral epistemology of remote fighting
Ethics and Information Technology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , pp 87-98
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Military robotics
- Information technology
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands