Date: 08 Nov 2012
Getting ‘virtual’ wrongs right
- Robert Francis John Seddon
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Whilst some philosophical progress has been made on the ethical evaluation of playing video games, the exact subject matter of this enquiry remains surprisingly opaque. ‘Virtual murder’, simulation, representation and more are found in a literature yet to settle into a tested and cohesive terminology. Querying the language of the virtual in particular, I suggest that it is at once inexplicit and laden with presuppositions potentially liable to hinder anyone aiming to construct general philosophical claims about an ethics of gameplay, for whom assumptions about the existence of ‘virtual’ counterparts to morally salient phenomena may prove untrustworthy. Ambiguously straddling the pictorial and the performative aspects of video gaming, the virtual leaves obscure the ways in which we become involved in gameplay, and particularly the natures of our intentions and attitudes whilst grappling with a game; furthermore, it remains unclear how we are to generalise across encounters with the virtual. I conclude by briefly noting one potential avenue of further enquiry into our modes of participation in games: into the differences which a moral examination of playfulness might make to ethical evaluation.
Abell, C. (2009). Canny resemblance. Philosophical Review, 118, 183–223.CrossRef
Barker, M. & Petley, J. (2001). Introduction: From bad research to good—a guide for the perplexed. In M. Barker & J. Petley (Eds.), Ill effects: The media/violence debate (pp. 1–26). London: Routledge.
Bartel, C. (2012). Resolving the gamer’s dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 11–16.CrossRef
Brey, P. (1999). The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 5–14.CrossRef
Brey, P. (2005). The epistemology and ontology of human-computer interaction. Minds and Machines, 15, 383–398.CrossRef
Castronova, E. (2005). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Gooskens, G. (2011). Beyond good and evil? Morality in video games. Philosophical Writings, 1, 37–44.
Gooskens, G. (2012). Varieties of pictorial experience. Dissertation: University of Antwerp. http://www.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=geert.gooskens&n=74164&ct=69173&e=298021 Accessed 12th May, 2012.
King, B. (2002). Make love, not war games. http://www.wired.com/gaming/gamingreviews/news/2002/06/52894?currentPage=all Accessed 14th June, 2012.
King, B., & Borland, J. (2003). Dungeons and dreamers: The rise of computer game culture from geek to chic. Emeryville: McGraw-Hill/Osborne.
Koppelman, J. (2005). Does obscenity cause moral harm? Columbia Law Review, 105, 1634–1680.
Levy, N. (2002). Virtual child pornography: The eroticization of inequality. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 319–323.CrossRef
Lewis, A. (2011). Ageplay: An adults only game. Counselling Australia, 11(2), 1–9.
McCormick, M. (2001). Is it wrong to play violent video games? Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 277–287.CrossRef
Meek, C. (2008). Just age playing around? How second life aids and abets child pornography. North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, 9, 88–111.
Midgley, M. (1996). Can education be moral? Res Publica, 2(1), 77–85.CrossRef
Patridge, S. (2011). The incorrigible social meaning of video game imagery. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 303–312.CrossRef
Phillips, B. (2009). Staying power: Rethinking feedback to keep players in the game. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/132559/staying_power_rethinking_feedback_.php?print=1 Accessed 24th April, 2012.
Rossignol, J. (2008). This gaming life: Travels in three cities. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Sartre, J.-P. (2010). The imaginary. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schneider, S. (2009). The paradox of fiction. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/fict-par/ Accessed 9th May, 2012.
Schulzke, M. (2010). Defending the morality of violent video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 127–138.CrossRef
Sicart, M. (2009). The banality of simulated evil: Designing ethical gameplay. Ethics and Information Technology, 11, 191–202.CrossRef
Singer, P. (2007). Video game violence vs. virtual pedophilia. The Japan Times Online. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/eo20070722a1.html Accessed 11th May, 2012.
Smuts, A. (2009). What is interactivity? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 43(4), 53–73.CrossRef
Stolnitz, J. (1992). On the cognitive triviality of art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 32(3), 191–200.CrossRef
Weiss, M. D. (2006). Working at play: BDSM sexuality in the San Francisco Bay Area. Anthropologica, 48, 229–245.CrossRef
Williams, B., et al. (1979). Report of the committee on obscenity and film censorship. United Kingdom: H.M.S.O., Cmnd 7772.
Wilson, R. F. (2009). Sex play in virtual worlds. Washington and Lee Law Review, 66(3), 1127–1174.
Wolfendale, J. (2007). My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 111–119.CrossRef
Wonderly, M. (2008). A Humean approach to assessing the moral significance of ultra-violent video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 1–10.CrossRef
Zimmerman, E. (2012). Jerked around by the magic circle: Clearing the air ten years later. http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6696/jerked_around_by_the_magic_circle_.php Retrieved 16th June, 2012.
- Getting ‘virtual’ wrongs right
Ethics and Information Technology
Volume 15, Issue 1 , pp 1-11
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Computer games
- Virtual murder
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Durham University, 50 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HN, UK