The case for e-trust
Trust is generally understood as a relationship in which an agent (the trustor) decides to depend on another agent’s (the trustee) foreseeable behaviour in order to fulfil his expectations. It is a fundamental aspect of social interactions, as it has economical, social, psychological and ethical implications, and as such it is a crucial topic in several research areas (Gambetta 1998; Taddeo 2009).
In the past decade, research interest in trust-related concepts and phenomena has escalated following the advent of the information revolution (Floridi 2008). The use of Information and Communication Technologies, of Computer Mediated Communications (CMCs), and the development of artificial agents—such as SatNav systems, drones, and robotic companion—have provided unprecedented opportunities for social interactions in informational environments, involving human as well as artificial and hybrid agents (Ess 2010). In such scenario, one of the most problematic issues is represented by the emergen
- Ess, C. M. (2010). Trust and new communication technologies: vicious circles, virtuous circles, possible futures. Knowledge Technology and Policy, 23(3/4), 287–305. CrossRef
- Floridi, L. (2008). Artificial intelligence’s new frontier: Artificial companions and the fourth revolution. Metaphilosophy, 39(4/5), 651–655. CrossRef
- Gambetta, D. (1998). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–238). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Johnson, D. G. (1997). Ethics Online, shaping social behavior online takes more than new laws and modified edicts. Communication of the ACM, 40(1), 60–65. CrossRef
- Jones, K. (1996). Trust as an affective attitude. Ethics and Information Technology, 107(1), 4–25.
- Nissenbaum, H. (2001). Securing trust online: Wisdom or oxymoron. Boston University Law Review, 81(3), 635–664.
- Papadopoulou, P. (2007). “Applying virtual reality for trust-building e-commerce environments”. Virtual Reality, 11(2–3), 107–127.
- Pettit, P. (1995). “The cunning of trust.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(3), 202–225.
- Seigman, A. B. (2000). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Taddeo, M. (2009). Defining trust and e-trust: Old theories and new problems. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 5(2), 23–35. CrossRef
- Taddeo, M. (2010). Modelling trust in artificial agents, a first step toward the analysis of e-trust. Minds and Machines, 20(2), 243–257. CrossRef
- Turilli, M., Vaccaro, A., et al. (2010). “The case of on-line trust”. Knowledge Technology and Policy, 23(3/4), 333–345. CrossRef
- Vries, P. d. (2006). Social presence as a conduit to the social dimensions of online trust. In W. IJsselsteijn, Y. d. Kort, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & E. v. d. Hoven (Eds.), Persuasive technology (pp. 55–59). Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer
- Walker, M. U. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. New York: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Weckert, J. (2005). Trust in Cyberspace. In R. J. Cavalier (Ed.), The impact of the internet on our moral lives (pp. 95–120). Albany: University of New York Press.
- The case for e-trust
Ethics and Information Technology
Volume 13, Issue 1 , pp 1-3
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors