Realism in the Desert and in the Jungle: Reply to French, Ghins, and Psillos
- Anjan Chakravartty
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable has two primary aims. The first is to extract the most promising refinements of the idea of scientific realism to emerge in recent decades and assemble them into a maximally defensible realist position, semirealism. The second is to demonstrate that, contra antirealist scepticism to the contrary, key concepts typically invoked by realists in expounding their views can be given a coherent and unified explication. These concepts include notions of causation, laws of nature, scientific kinds, and approximate truth, and consequently, the demonstration undertaken includes a metaphysical study of ideas more commonly employed unreflectively in epistemological assessments of the sciences. In this paper, I answer searching critiques of this project by Steven French, Michel Ghins, and Stathis Psillos.
- Chakravartty, A. (2007). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- French, S. (2013). Semi-realism, sociability and structure. Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9417-0.
- Ghins, M. (2013). Semirealism, concrete structures and theory change. Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9416-1.
- Psillos, S. (2013). Semirealism or Neo-Aristotelianism? Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9418-z.
- Realism in the Desert and in the Jungle: Reply to French, Ghins, and Psillos
Volume 78, Issue 1 , pp 39-58
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, 100 Malloy Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA