Critical Discussion: Virtue Epistemology and Extended Cognition: A Reply to Kelp and Greco
- Krist Vaesen
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Elsewhere, I have challenged virtue epistemology and argued that it doesn’t square with mundane cases of extended cognition. Kelp (forthcoming, this journal) and Greco (forthcoming) have responded to my charges, the former by questioning the force of my argument, the latter by developing a new virtue epistemology. Here I consider both responses. I show first that Kelp mischaracterizes my challenge. Subsequently, I identify two new problems for Greco’s new virtue epistemology.
- Adams, F. (2012). Extended cognition meets epistemology. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 107–119. CrossRef
- Aizawa, K. (2012). Distinguishing virtue epistemology and extended cognition. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 91–106. CrossRef
- Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 1, 7–19.
- Craig, E. (1990). Knowledge and the state of nature: An essay in conceptual synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Greco, J. (2007). The nature of ability and the purpose of knowledge. Philosophical Issues, 17(1), 57–69. CrossRef
- Greco, J. (forthcoming). A (different) virtue epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
- Haugeland, J. (1998). Having thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Hawthorne, J. (2002). Deeply contingent a priori knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 247–269. CrossRef
- Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kelp, C. (forthcoming). Extended cognition and robust virtue epistemology. Erkenntnis.
- Lackey, J. (2007). Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know. Synthese, 158(3), 345–361. CrossRef
- Menary, R. (2012). Cognitive practices and cognitive character. Philosophical Explorations, 15(2), 147–164. CrossRef
- Pritchard, D. (2009). Knowledge and virtue: Response to Kelp. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17, 589–596. CrossRef
- Pritchard, D. (2010). Cognitive ability and the extended cognition thesis. Synthese, 175, 133—151. CrossRef
- Riggs, W. D. (2007). Why epistemologists are so down on their luck. Synthese, 158, 329–344. CrossRef
- Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in perspective: Selected essays in epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and practical interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Turri, J. (2011). Manifest failure: The Gettier problem solved. Philosophers’ Imprint, 11, 1–11.
- Vaesen, K. (2011). Knowledge without credit, exhibit 4: Extended cognition. Synthese, 181, 515–529. CrossRef
- Critical Discussion: Virtue Epistemology and Extended Cognition: A Reply to Kelp and Greco
Volume 78, Issue 4 , pp 963-970
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Krist Vaesen (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy and Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands