Weisberg on Design: What Fine-Tuning’s Got to Do with It
- Darren Bradley
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Jonathan Weisberg (Analysis, 70(3), pp. 431–438, 2010) argues that, given that life exists, the fact that the universe is fine-tuned for life does not confirm the design hypothesis. And if the fact that life exists confirms the design hypothesis, fine-tuning is irrelevant. So either way, fine-tuning has nothing to do with it. I will defend a design argument that survives Weisberg’s critique—the fact that life exists supports the design hypothesis, but it only does so given fine-tuning.
- Bradley, D. J. (2009). Multiple universes and observation selection effects. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46(1), 61–72.
- Collins, R. (2003). Evidence for fine-tuning. In N. Manson (Ed.), God, design: The teleological argument, modern science. London: Routledge.
- Hacking, I. (1965). The logic of statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- McMullin, E. (1993). Indifference principle and anthropic principle in cosmology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 359–389. CrossRef
- Rees, M. (1999). Just six numbers. New York: Basic Books.
- Weisberg, J. (2010). A note on design: What’s fine-tuning got to do with it? Analysis, 70(3), 431–438. CrossRef
- White. (2011). ‘What fine-tuning’s got to do with it: A reply to Weisberg’. Analysis. doi:10.1093/analys/anr100
- Weisberg on Design: What Fine-Tuning’s Got to Do with It
Volume 77, Issue 3 , pp 435-438
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Darren Bradley (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, 160 Convent Ave, New York, NY, 10031, USA