, Volume 74, Issue 2, pp 241-262

Evidence and Knowledge

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

According to Williamson, your evidence consists of all and only what you know (E = K). According to his critics, it doesn’t. While E = K calls for revision, the revisions it calls for are minor. E = K gets this much right. Only true propositions can constitute evidence and anything you know non-inferentially is part of your evidence. In this paper, I defend these two theses about evidence and its possession from Williamson’s critics who think we should break more radically from E = K.