Coherence and Reliability: The Case of Overlapping Testimonies
- Stefan Schubert
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A measure of coherence is said to be reliability conducive if and only if a higher degree of coherence (as measured) among testimonies implies a higher probability that the witnesses are reliable. Recently, it has been proved that several coherence measures proposed in the literature are reliability conducive in scenarios of equivalent testimonies (Olsson and Schubert 2007; Schubert, to appear). My aim is to investigate which coherence measures turn out to be reliability conducive in the more general scenario where the testimonies do not have to be equivalent. It is shown that four measures are reliability conducive in the present scenario, all of which are ordinally equivalent to the Shogenji measure. I take that to be an argument for the Shogenji measure being a fruitful explication of coherence.
- Angere, S. (2008). Coherence as a heuristic. Mind, 117, 1–26. CrossRef
- BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Bovens, L., & Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bovens, L., & Olsson, E. (2000). Coherentism, reliability and Bayesian networks. Mind, 109, 685–719. CrossRef
- Bovens, L., & Olsson, E. (2002). Believing more, risking less: On coherence, truth and non-trivial extensions. Erkenntnis, 57, 137–150. CrossRef
- Carnap, R. (1951). Logical foundations of probability. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Douven, I., & Meijs, W. (2007). Measuring coherence. Synthese, 156, 405–425. CrossRef
- Finch, H. A. (1960). Confirming power of observations metricized for decisions among hypotheses. Philosophy of Science, 27, 293–307. CrossRef
- Fitelson, B. (2003). A probabilistic theory of coherence. Analysis, 63, 194–199. CrossRef
- Gärdenfors, P., Hansson, B., & Sahlin, N.-E. (Eds.). (1983). Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory. Lund: Library of Theoria.
- Gillies, D. (1986). In defense of the Popper-Miller argument. Philosophy of Science, 53, 110–113. CrossRef
- Horwich, P. (1998). Wittgensteinian Bayesianism. In M. Curd & J. A. Cover (Eds.), Philosophy of science: The central issues. New York and London: Norton.
- Jeffrey, R. (1992). Probability and the art of judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Marchmillan & Co. Ltd.
- Levi, I. (1962). Corroboration and rules of acceptance. Brititsh Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 13, 307–313.
- Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court.
- Meijs, W. (2006). Probabilistic measures of coherence. Doctoral Disseration: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
- Milne, P. (1996). log[p(h/eb)/p(h/b)] is the one true measure of confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 63, 21–26. CrossRef
- Olsson, E. J. (2002). Corroborating testimony. Probability and Surprise British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 273–288. CrossRef
- Olsson, E. J. (2005). Against coherence: Truth, probability and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Olsson, E. J., & Schubert, S. (2007). Reliability conducive measures of coherence. Synthese, 157, 297–308. CrossRef
- Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Popper, K. (1954). Degree of confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 5, 143–149. CrossRef
- Rosenkrantz, R. (1994). Bayesian confirmation: Paradise regained. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 467–476. CrossRef
- Schlesinger, G. (1995). Measuring degrees of confirmation. Analysis, 55, 208–212. CrossRef
- Schubert, S. Coherence reasoning and reliability: A defense of the Shogenji measure. To be published in Synthese.
- Shogenji, T. (1999). Is coherence truth conducive? Anaysis, 59, 338–345. CrossRef
- Siebel, M., & Wolff, W. (2008). Equivalent testimonies as a touchstone of coherence. Synthese, 161, 167–182. CrossRef
- Coherence and Reliability: The Case of Overlapping Testimonies
Volume 74, Issue 2 , pp 263-275
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Stefan Schubert (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, Lund University, Kungshuset, Lundagård, 222 22, Lund, Sweden