A Puzzle About Desire
- Chase B. Wrenn
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The following four assumptions plausibly describe the ideal rational agent. (1) She knows what her beliefs are. (2) She desires to believe only truths. (3) Whenever she desires that P → Q and knows that P, she desires that Q. (4) She does not both desire that P and desire that ~P, for any P. Although the assumptions are plausible, they have an implausible consequence. They imply that the ideal rational agent does not believe and desire contradictory propositions. She neither desires the world to be any different than she thinks it is, nor thinks it is any different than she desires it to be. The problem of preserving our intuitions about desire, without embracing the implausible conclusion, is what I call “the Wishful Thinking Puzzle.” In this paper, I examine how this puzzle arises, and I argue that it is surprisingly difficult to solve. Even the decision theoretic conception of desire is not immune to the puzzle. One approach, the contrastive conception of desire, does avoid the puzzle without being ad hoc, but it remains too inchoate to win our full confidence.
- Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Blackburn, S. (2005). Truth: A guide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Bradley, R. (1999). Conditional desirability. Theory and Decision, 47, 23–55. CrossRef
- Chisholm, R. (1977). Theory of knowledge (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Chisholm, R. (1989). Theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Gauker, C. (2005). The belief-desire law. Facta Philosophica, 7, 121–144. CrossRef
- Goldstein, L. (1992). A Buridanian discussion of desire, murder and democracy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70(4), 405–414. CrossRef
- Jeffrey, R. (1965). The logic of decision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Kornblith, H. (1993). Epistemic normativity. Synthese, 94(3), 357–376. CrossRef
- Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339–359. CrossRef
- Lewis, D. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59(1), 5–30. CrossRef
- Lewis, D. (1996). Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74(4), 549–567. CrossRef
- Lynch, M. P. (2004). True to life: Why truth matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Moore, F. C. T. (1994). Goldstein on the road to Rome. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(2), 229–232. CrossRef
- Piller, C. (2009). Desiring the truth and nothing but the truth. Nous, 43(2), 193–213. CrossRef
- Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and progress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Sobel, D., & Copp, D. (2001). Against direction of fit accounts of belief and desire. Analysis, 61(1), 44–53. CrossRef
- Sosa, E. (2001). For the love of truth? In A. Fairweather & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue epistemology: Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility (pp. 49–62). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Stalnaker, R. (1970). Probability and conditionals. Philosophy of science, 37(1), 64–80. CrossRef
- Stalnaker, R. (1999). Indicative conditionals. In R. Stalnaker (Ed.), Context and content (pp. 63–77). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Williams, B. (1973). Deciding to believe. In B. Williams (Ed.), Problems of the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Williams, B. (1978). Descartes: The project of pure enquiry. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
- Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Wrenn, C. (2005). Pragmatism, truth and inquiry. Contemporary Pragmatism, 2(1), 95–113.
- Wrenn, C. (2010). Truth is not instrumentally valuable. In Cory Wright & Nikolaj Pederson (Eds.), New waves in truth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- A Puzzle About Desire
Volume 73, Issue 2 , pp 185-209
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Chase B. Wrenn (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama, Campus Box 0218, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487-0218, USA