Eco-Efficiency of Electric and Electronic Appliances: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Several papers have studied the eco-efficiency of manufacturing systems to address strategic socioeconomic issues in the context of sustainability analysis. Their goal has been to take into account not only environmental impact aspects throughout the whole life cycle but also to incorporate the associated economic value as well, thus, giving a comprehensive vision of both factors. This paper focuses on different commonplace household electric appliances, comparing their eco-efficiency computed using a data envelopment analysis model. We consider the retail price as a measure of the product’s economic value and the ecopoint LCA score as the assessment of its environmental impact. We conclude that cell phones and the bulky analyzed appliances have the highest eco-efficiency scores, whereas the rest would require a more environmentally friendly redesign and/or an increase in their perceived value to improve their eco-efficiency.
- Ahbe, S., Braunschweig, A., & Müller-Wenk, R. (1990). Methodology for ecobalances based on ecological optimization, BUWAL (SAFEL) Environment Series No. 133; Bern.
- Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35–44. CrossRef
- Chung, Y. R., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229–240. CrossRef
- Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Boston: Kluwer.
- Cui, J., & Forssberg, E. (2003). Mechanical recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B99, 243–263. CrossRef
- Dahlbo, H., Ollikainen, M., Koskela, S., & Melanen, M. (2005). The value of old news—managing discarded newspaper. Waste Management World, 75–81, May–June.
- Doyle, J. R., & Green, R. H. (1991). Comparing products using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 19(6), 631–638. CrossRef
- Dyckhoff, H., & Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 312–325. CrossRef
- EEA. (2003). Waste from electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). European Environment Agency, EEA: Copenhagen.
- Erkko, S., Melanen, M., & Mickwitz, P. (2005). Eco-efficiency in the Finnish EMAS reports—a buzz word? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 799–813. CrossRef
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 90–98. CrossRef
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Tyteca, D. (1996). An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18, 161–175. CrossRef
- Guinée, J. B. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards (vol. 7). Dordrecht: Kluwer, Book Series Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science.
- Herrero, I., & Salmerón, J. L. (2005). Using the DEA methodology to rank software technical efficiency. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 101–106. CrossRef
- Hofstetter, P. (1998). Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
- Huppes, G., & Ishikawa, M. (2005). A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 25–41. CrossRef
- ISO—International Standard Organization (1997a). ISO/DIS 14040 environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and structure.
- ISO—International Standard Organization (1997b). ISO/DIS 14042 environmental management–Life cycle assessment–Life cycle impact assessment.
- Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 437–446. CrossRef
- Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2005). Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 59–72. CrossRef
- Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of consumer durables using absolute shadow prices. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 57–69. CrossRef
- Michelsen, O., Fet, A. M., & Dahlsrud, A. (2006). Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: A case study of furniture production. Journal of Environmental Management, 79, 290–297. CrossRef
- OECD. (1998). Eco-efficiency. Paris: OECD.
- Papahristodoulou, C. (1997). A DEA model to evaluate car efficiency. Applied Economics, 29, 1493–1508. CrossRef
- Pré Consultants (2004). Introduction to LCA with SimaPro 6.0. September.
- Raluy, R. G., Serra, L., Uche, J., & Valero, (2004). A. Life-cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with energy production systems. Desalination, 167, 445–458. CrossRef
- Rebitzera, G., Ekvallb, T., Frischknechtc, R., Hunkelerd, D., Norrise, G., Rydbergf, T., et al. (2004). Life cycle assessment. Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30, 701–720. CrossRef
- Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Thijssen, G. J. (2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 287–303. CrossRef
- Scheel, H. (2000). EMS: Efficiency measurement system, operations research und wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Dortmund (2000) (http://www.wiso.uni-dortmund.de/lsfg/or/scheel/ems/) (last accessed 2007-09-03).
- Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Changing course: A global perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- SETAC (1993). Guidelines for life-cycle assessment. A code or practice, SETAC Workshop, Sesimbra.
- Streicher-Porte, M., Widmer, R., Jain, A., Bader, H.-P., Scheidegger, R., & Kytzia, S. (2005). Key drivers of the e-waste recycling system: Assessing and modelling e-waste processing in the informal sector in Delhi. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 472–491. CrossRef
- Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis—A foundation text with integrated software. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
- Tsilingiridis, G., Martinopoulos, G., & Kyriakis, N. (2004). Life cycle environmental impact of a thermosyphonic domestic solar hot water system in comparison with electrical and gas water heating. Renewable Energy, 29, 1277–1288. CrossRef
- Udo de Haes, H. A., Finnveden, G., Goedkoop, M., Hauschild, M., Hertwich, E., Hofstetter, P., et al. (2002). Life-cycle impact assessment: Striving towards best practice. Pensacola, FL: SETAC Publications.
- UNCTAD (2003). A manual for the preparers and users of eco-efficiency indicators. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, available from: http://www.ellipson.com/files/studies/Eco_eff_Guideline.pdf (accessed May 30th 2007).
- Verfaillie, H. A., & Bidwell, R. (2000). Measuring eco-efficiency. A guide to reporting company performance. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
- Zaim, O. (2004). Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: A DEA framework. Ecological Economics, 48, 37–47. CrossRef
- Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 111–118. CrossRef
- Eco-Efficiency of Electric and Electronic Appliances: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
Environmental Modeling & Assessment
Volume 14, Issue 4 , pp 439-447
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Data envelopment analysis (DEA)
- Electric and electronic waste