Promoting Large, Compact Mature Forest Patches in Harvest Scheduling Models
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Spatially explicit harvest scheduling models that can promote the development of dynamic mature forest patches have been proposed in the past. This paper introduces a formulation that extends these models by allowing the total perimeter of the patches to be constrained or minimized. Test run results suggest that the proposed model can produce solutions with fewer, larger, and more compact patches. In addition, patches are more likely to be temporally connected with this formulation. Methods for identifying the tradeoffs between the net present value of the forest and the size and perimeter of the evolving patches are demonstrated for a hypothetical forest.
- Carter, D. R., Vogiatzis, M., Moss, C. B., & Arvanitis, L. G. (1997). Ecosystem management or infeasible guidelines? Implications of adjacency restrictions for wildlife habitat and timber production. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 1302–1310. CrossRef
- Fischer, D. T., & Church, R. L. (2003). Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: An extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science, 49(4), 555–565.
- Franklin, J. F., & Forman, R. T. (1987). Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology, 1, 5–18. CrossRef
- Gates, J. E., & Gysel, L. W. (1978). Avian nest dispersion and fledgling success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology, 59, 871–883. CrossRef
- Gustafson, E. J., & Crow, T. R. (1998). Simulating spatial and temporal context of forest management using hypothetical landscapes. Environmental Management, 22(5), 777–787. CrossRef
- Harris, L. D. (1984). The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity (p. 211). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- ILOG (2003). CPLEX 9.0 Reference Manual, in ILOG Optimization Suite 2.0 Documentation.
- Johnson, K. N., & Scheurman, H. L. (1977). Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives – discussion and synthesis. Forest Science Monographs, 18.
- Jones, J. G., Meneghin, B. J., & Kirby, M. W. (1991). Formulating adjacency constraints in linear optimization models for scheduling projects in tactical planning. Forest Science, 37(5), 1283–1297.
- Litvaitis, J. A. (1993). Response of early successional vertebrates to historic changes in land use. Conservation Biology, 7(4), 866–873. CrossRef
- Marianov, V., ReVelle, C. S., & Snyder, S. (In Review). Selecting compact habitat reserves for species with differential habitat size needs.
- Matlack, G. R., & Litvaitis, J. A. (2000). Forest edges. In M. L. Hunter (Ed.), Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems (p. 698). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- McDill, M. E., Rebain, S., & Braze, J. (2002). Harvest scheduling with area-based adjacency constraints. Forest Science, 48(4), 631–642.
- McDonnell, M. D., Possingham, H. P., Ball, I. R., & Cousins, E. A. (2002). Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 7, 107–114. CrossRef
- Murray, A. T. (1999). Spatial restrictions in harvest scheduling. Forest Science, 45(1), 45–52.
- Murray, A. T., & Church., R. L. (1996a). Analyzing cliques for imposing adjacency restrictions in forest models. Forest Science, 42(2), 166–175.
- Murray, A. T., & Church, R. L. (1996b). Constructing and selecting adjacency constraints. INFOR, 34(3), 232–248.
- Önal, H., & Briers, R. A. (2002). Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 2437–2441. CrossRef
- Önal, H., & Briers, R. A. (2003). Selection of a minimum-boundary reserve network using integer programming. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 1487–1491. CrossRef
- Önal, H., & Briers, R. A. (2006). Optimal selection of a connected reserve network. Operations Research, 54(2), 379–388. CrossRef
- Paton, P. W. C. (1994). The effect of edge on avian nest success: How strong is the evidence? Conservation Biology, 8, 17–26. CrossRef
- Rebain, S., & McDill, M. E. (2003a). Can mature patch constraints mitigate the fragmenting effect of harvest opening size restrictions? International Transactions in Operational Research, 10(5), 499–513. CrossRef
- Rebain, S., & McDill, M. E. (2003b). A mixed-integer formulation of the minimum patch size problem. Forest Science, 49(4), 608–618.
- Snyder, S., & ReVelle, C. (1996a). Temporal and spatial harvesting of irregular systems of parcels. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 1079–1088. CrossRef
- Snyder, S., & ReVelle, C. (1996b). The grid packing problem: Selecting a harvest pattern in an area with forbidden regions. Forest Science, 42(1), 27–34.
- Snyder, S., & ReVelle, C. (1997a). Multiobjective grid packing model: An application in forest management. Location Science, 5(3), 165–180. CrossRef
- Snyder, S., & ReVelle, C. (1997b). Dynamic selection of harvests with adjacency restrictions: The SHARe Model. Forest Science, 43(2), 213–222.
- Spies, T. A., & Turner, M. G. (1999). Dynamic forest mosaics. In M. L. Hunter (Ed.), Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems (p. 698). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- Tahvonen, O. (2004). Timber production versus old-growth preservation with endogenous prices and forest age-classes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34(6), 1296–1310.
- Thompson, E. F., Halterman, B. G., Lyon, T. J., & Miller, R. L. (1973). Integrating timber and wildlife management planning. The Forestry Chronicle, 247–250.
- Tóth, S. F., McDill, M. E., & Rebain, S. (2006). Finding the efficient frontier of a bi-criteria, spatially-explicit harvest scheduling problem. Forest Science, 52(1), 93–107.
- Williams, J. C., & ReVelle, C. S. (1996). A 0–1 programming approach to delineating protected reserves. Environment and Planning. B, Planning and Design, 23, 607–624. CrossRef
- Williams, J. C., & ReVelle, C. S. (1998). Reserve assemblage of critical areas: A zero–one programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 104, 497–509. CrossRef
- Williams, J. C., ReVelle, C. S., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Spatial attributes and reserve design models: A review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 10, 163–181. CrossRef
- Wright, J., ReVelle, C. S., & Cohon, J. L. (1983). A multiobjective integer programming model for the land acquisition problem. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13, 31–53. CrossRef
- Yahner, R. H. (1988). Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conservation Biology, 2, 333–339. CrossRef
- Promoting Large, Compact Mature Forest Patches in Harvest Scheduling Models
Environmental Modeling & Assessment
Volume 13, Issue 1 , pp 1-15
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- spatially explicit forest planning
- integer programming
- dynamic habitat patches
- minimum perimeter
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, 008C Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA
- 2. Penn State School of Forest Resources, 310 Forest Resources Bldg., University Park, PA, 16802, USA