Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, natural areas have become a preferred recreation area for people looking to escape their busy urban lives. The world has become so complicated that people now seek solace in areas of nature. Recreational activities conducted in natural areas, such as Ilgaz Mountain National Park, should be respectful of the environment to ensure balance and no negative environmental impact. This balance should safeguard environmental protection and only be used with the right to establish recreation planning. National parks are protected areas where the most beautiful wonders of nature exist. Thus, urban planning for recreation, and demand for recreation areas, must demonstrate both the potential of recreation resources and the protection of Ilgaz Mountain National Park. Urban open and green spaces have an important function, and in this study, it has been looked at Ilgaz Mountain National Park to examine the current situation. The aim of this study is to ensure the sustainability of natural and cultural resources via an evaluation to reveal the necessary practices and precautions regarding the area’s recreational potential. As a result, Ilgaz Mountain National Park’s recreation potential was found to be 72 %, and thus, it is considered to be an area of high recreation potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barros, A., Gonnet, J. M., & Pickering, C. M. (2013). Impacts of informal trails on vegetation and soils in the highest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, 50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2011). Public participation GIS: a new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calik, F., & Sertbas, K. (2014). Sport and recreation potential analysis of natural parks. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 14(2), 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cengiz, T. (2007). Tourism, an ecological approach in protected areas: Karagöl-Sahara National Park, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 14(3), 260–267. doi:10.1080/13504500709469726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, M. (2015a). Consideration of permeable pavement in landscape architecture. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 16(1), 385–392.

  • Cetin, M. (2015b). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(5), 420–424. doi:10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066.

  • Cetin, M. (2015c). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(6), 490–495. doi:10.1080/13504509.2015.1081651.

  • Cetin, M. (2015d). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu city. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 187(10), 640. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3.

  • Cheung, L. T. O., & Jim, C. Y. (2014). Expectations and willingness-to-pay for ecotourism services in Hong Kong’s conservation areas. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(2), 149–159. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.859183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhetri, P., & Arrowsmith, C. (2008). GIS-based modeling of recreational potential of nature-based tourist destinations. Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 10(2), 233–257. doi:10.1080/14616680802000089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, A. L. (2010). Recreation resource impacts in the bear lake road corridor of rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA: an assessment of resource conditions and visitor perceptions. Logan, UTAH, USA: Utah State University, Master dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Antonio, A., Monz, C., Newman, P., Lawson, S., & Taff, D. (2013). Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social–ecological approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 124, 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duzgunes, E., & Demirel, O. (2013). Determining the tourism potential of the Altındere Valley National Park (Trabzon/Turkey) with respect to its conservation value. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20(4), 358–368. doi:10.1080/13504509.2013.777861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti, D., & Dawa, D. (2009). Environmental impact assessment of mountain tourism in developing regions: a study in Ladakh, Indian Himalaya. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(4), 229–242. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, K. A. (2009). Protecting natural resources and the visitor experience on mountain summits in the Northern Forest: a framework for management. Master Dissertation. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulez, S. (1990). An evaluation method for determination of inside of forest recreation potential. Istanbul University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 40(2), 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastamonu. (2015). National Parks Directorate, Directorate of Kastamonu Ilgaz Mountain National Park. http://bolge10.ormansu.gov.tr/10bolge/AnaSayfa/milliparklarsubemudurlugu/ilgaz.aspx?sflang=tr accessed 12 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, L. G., & Aytekin, A. (2009). Determination of outdoor recreation potential: case of the city of Bartın and its environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1513–1524.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, L. G., Cetin, M., & Doygun, H. (2009). A holistic approach in analyzing the landscape potential: Porsuk Dam Lake and its environs, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18(8), 1525–153.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. K., & Daigle, J. J. (2012). Monitoring of vegetation impact due to trampling on Cadillac Mountain summit using high spatial resolution remote sensing data sets. Environmental Management, 50(5), 956–968. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9905-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliskey, A. D. (2000). Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52(1), 33–43. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00111-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maple, L. C., Eagles, P. F. J., & Rolfe, H. (2010). Birdwatchers’ specialisation characteristics and national park tourism planning. Journal of Ecotourism, 9(3), 219–238. doi:10.1080/14724040903370213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monz, C. A., Marion, J. L., Goonan, K. A., Manning, R. E., Wimpey, J., & Carr, C. (2010). Assessment and monitoring of recreation impacts and resource conditions on mountain summits: examples from the Northern Forest, USA. Mountain Research and Development, 30(4), 332–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-09-00078.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngoka, P. C. (2013). Capacity and levels of utilization of tourism potentials of Yankari and Cross River National Parks—implications for optimistic ecotourism development in Nigeria. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 2(4), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • NP. (2015). National Parks of Turkey 2015. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of forest and water. The general of directorate of nature protection and national parks. http://www.milliparklar.gov.tr/mp/ilgazdagi/index.htm accessed 12 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okelloa, M. M., & Yerian, S. (2009). Tourist satisfaction in relation to attractions and implications for conservation in the protected areas of the Northern Circuit, Tanzania. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(5), 605–625. doi:10.1080/09669580902928450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TC. (2015). Tourism and Culture. Republic of Turkey. Ministry of Tourism and Culture. Kastamonu directorate of culture and tourism. http://www.kastamonukultur.gov.tr/TR,63883/milli-parklar-ve-korunan-alanlar.html accessed 14 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomczyk, A. M. (2011). A GIS assessment and modelling of environmental sensitivity of recreational trails: the case of Gorce National Park, Poland. Applied Geography, 31(1), 339–351. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topay, M. (2013). Mapping of thermal comfort for outdoor recreation planning using GIS: the case of Isparta Province (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37, 110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topay, M., & Memluk, Y. (2011). Suitable for recreational area events choice for a new method approach: a case study of Bartin-Uluyayla. Suleyman Demirel University. Journal of Faculty of Forestry, 12(2), 141–147. Isparta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. T., Xiang, C., & Li, M. (2012). Effects of tourism and topography on vegetation diversity in the subalpine meadows of the Dongling Mountains of Beijing, China. Environmental Management, 49(2), 403–411. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9786-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Sevik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cetin, M., Sevik, H. Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 188, 52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5064-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5064-7

Keywords

Navigation