Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of arsenic concentration on surfaces of in-service CCA-treated wood planks in a park and its influencing field factors

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wood preservatives can protect wood from dry rot, fungi, mould and insect damage, and chromated copper arsenate (CCA) has been used as an inorganic preservative for many years. However, wood treated with CCA has been restricted from residential uses in the EU from June 30, 2004, due to its potential toxicity. Such a regulation is not in place in China yet, and CCA-treated wood is widely used in public parks. A portable XRF analyser was used to investigate arsenic (As) concentration on surfaces of in-service CCA-treated wood planks in a popular park as well as the influencing field factors of age in-service, immersion and human footfall. With a total of 1207 readings, the observed As concentrations varied from below the detection limit (<10 mg/kg) to 15,746 mg/kg with a median of 1160 mg/kg. Strong variation of As concentrations were observed in different wood planks of the same age, on the surface of the same piece of wood, inside the same piece of wood, and different surfaces of walkway planks, hand rails and poles in the field. The oldest planks exhibited high As concentrations, which was related to its original treatment with high retention of CCA preservative. The effect of immersion in the field for about 4 months was insignificant for As concentration on the surfaces. However, a significant reduction of As was observed for immersion combined with human footfall (wiping by shoes). Human traffic in general caused slightly reduced and more evenly distributed As concentrations on the wood surfaces. The strong variation, slow aging and relatively weak immersion effects found in this study demonstrate that the in-service CCA-treated wood poses potential health risks to the park users, due to easy dermal contact especially when the wood is wet after rainfall. It is suggested that further comprehensive investigations and risk assessments of CCA-treated wood in residential areas in China are needed, and precautionary measures should be considered to reduce the potential risks to residents and visitors, especially children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APVMA (Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority) 2005 The Reconsideration of Registrations of Arsenic Timber Treatment Products (CCA and Arsenic Trioxide) and Their Associated Labels. Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority, Canberra, Australia. (http://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/arsenic-phase-8-summary.pdf) (Last access date: August 25, 2014). 72 pp

  • Blassino, M., Solo-Gabriele, H. M., & Townsend, T. G. (2002). Pilot scale evaluation of sorting technologies for CCA-treated wood waste. Waste Management and Research, 20(3), 290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, C. N., Shibata, T., Solo-Gabriele, H. M., & Townsend, T. G. (2007). Use of handheld X-ray fluorescence spectrometry units for identification of arsenic in treated wood. Environmental Pollution, 148, 627–633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, K. M. (1996). Evaluating the environmental risks associated with the use of chromated copper arsenate-treated wood products in aquatic environments. Estuaries, 19(2A), 296–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coudert, L., Blais, J.-F., Mercier, G., Cooper, P., Janin, A., & Gastonguay, L. (2014). Demonstration of the efficiency and robustness of an acid leaching process to remove metals from various CCA-treated wood samples. Journal of Environmental Management, 132, 197–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, W., & Chen, J. (2003). A probabilistic risk assessment for children who contact CCA-treated playsets and decks. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. 325 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Communities), 2003. Official Journal of the European Communities, 9.1.2003, COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2003/2/EC of 6 January 2003 relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic (tenth adaptation to technical progress to Council Directive 76/769/EEC).

  • EC (European Communities), 2006. Official Journal of the European Union, 29.12.2006. COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2006/139/EC of 20 December 2006 amending Council Directive 76/769/EEC as regards restrictions on the marketing and use of arsenic compounds for the purpose of adapting its Annex I to technical progress.

  • Hingston, J. A., Collins, C. D., Murphy, R. J., Lester, J. N., & Lester, J. N. (2001). Leaching of chromated copper arsenate wood preservatives: a review. Environmental Pollution, 111, 53–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, G., Solo-Gabriele, H., Townsend, T., & Dubey, B. (2007). Evaluation of methods for sorting CCA-treated wood. Waste Management, 27(1), 1617–1625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jambeck, J. R., Townsend, T., & Solo-Gabriele, H. (2006). Leaching of chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood in a simulated monofill and its potential impacts to landfill leachate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 135, 21–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiuzhaigou National Park Administration, 2014. Welcome to Jiuzhai Valley. http://www.jiuzhai.com/language/english/index.html (Last access date: August 25, 2014)

  • Khan, B. I., Solo-Gabriele, H. M., Townsend, T. G., & Yong Cai, Y. (2006). Release of arsenic to the environment from CCA-treated wood. 1. Leaching and speciation during service. Environmental. Science. and Technology, 40(3), 988–993. doi:10.1021/es0514702.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, T. G., & Frostick, L. E. (2012). Leaching characteristics of CCA-treated wood waste: a UK study. Science of the Total Environment, 427–428, 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, T. G., & Frostick, L. E. (2014). Evaluating the potential for environmental pollution from chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood waste: a new mass balance approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 276, 10–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, T. G., & Greenway, G. M. (2014). Diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT) for profiling leaching of CCA-treated wood waste mulch into the soil environment. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 94, 115–126. doi:10.1080/03067319.2013.871712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddam, A.H., and Mulligan, C.N., 2008. Leaching of heavy metals from chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood after disposal. Waste Management 28(3), 2008: 628–637.

  • Read, D., 2003. Report on Copper, Chromium and Arsenic (CCA) Treated Timber. Environmental Risk Management Authority, New Zealand (http://www.epa.govt.nz/Publications/cca-report.pdf, last access date: August 25, 2014). 68 pp.

  • Shibata, T., Solo-Gabriele, H. M., Dubey, B., Townsend, T. G., & Jacobi, G. A. (2006). Arsenic leaching from mulch made from recycled construction and demolition wood and impacts of ironoxide colorants. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 5102–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, T., Solo-Gabriele, H. M., Fleming, L. E., Cai, Y., & Townsend, T. G. (2007). A mass balance approach for evaluating leachable arsenic and chromium from an in-service CCA-treated wood structure. The Science of the Total Environment, 372, 624–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solo-Gabriele, H. M., Townsend, T. G., Hahn, D. W., Moskal, T. M., Hosein, N., Jambeck, J., & Jacobi, G. (2004). Evaluation of XRF and LIBS technologies for on-line sorting of CCA-treated wood waste. Waste Management, 24, 413–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, D. E., & Gorny, K. D. (1997). Contamination of soil with copper, chromium and arsenic under decks built from pressure treated wood. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 58, 22–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, D., Toner, M., & Sawhney, B. (2003). Dislodgeable copper, chromium and arsenic from CCA-treated wood surfaces. The Science of the Total Environment, 312, 123–131. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00195-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2011. Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA). Http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/reregistration/cca/ (last access date: November 7, 2014).

  • Weis, P., Weis, J. S., Greenberg, A., & Nosker, T. J. (1992). Toxicity of construction materials in the marine environment: a comparison of chromated-copper-arsenate-treated wood and recycled plastic. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 22, 99–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, K., Tanaka, M., & Deguchi, Y. (2006). Basic evaluation of sorting technologies for CCA treated wood waste. WIT Transactions on Biomedicine and Health, 10, 319–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zagury, G. J., Samson, R., & Deschenes, L. (2003). Occurrence of metals in soil and ground water near chromated copper arsenate-treated utility poles. J Environmental Quality, 32, 507–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly sponsored by the Chinese “111” Project (no. B08037) awarded to Sichuan University, China, and Jiuzhaigou National Park Administration, Aba Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China. The authors thank the staff of Jiuzhaigou National Park for their assistance during the field work and provision of the park information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaosheng Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, Y., Gao, W., Wang, X. et al. Variation of arsenic concentration on surfaces of in-service CCA-treated wood planks in a park and its influencing field factors. Environ Monit Assess 187, 4214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4214-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4214-7

Keywords

Navigation