Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Increasing evidences show that inhalation of indoor bioaerosols has caused numerous adverse health effects and diseases. However, the bioaerosol size distribution, composition, and concentration level, representing different inhalation risks, could vary with different living environments. The six-stage Andersen sampler is designed to simulate the sampling of different human lung regions. Here, the sampler was used in investigating the bioaerosol exposure in six different environments (student dorm, hospital, laboratory, hotel room, dining hall, and outdoor environment) in Beijing. During the sampling, the Andersen sampler was operated for 30 min for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed for each of the environments. The air samples collected onto each of the six stages of the sampler were incubated on agar plates directly at 26 °C, and the colony forming units (CFU) were manually counted and statistically corrected. In addition, the developed CFUs were washed off the agar plates and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for diversity analysis. Results revealed that for most environments investigated, the culturable bacterial aerosol concentrations were higher than those of culturable fungal aerosols. The culturable bacterial and fungal aerosol fractions, concentration, size distribution, and diversity were shown to vary significantly with the sampling environments. PCR-DGGE analysis indicated that different environments had different culturable bacterial aerosol compositions as revealed by distinct gel band patterns. For most environments tested, larger (>3 μm) culturable bacterial aerosols with a skewed size distribution were shown to prevail, accounting for more than 60 %, while for culturable fungal aerosols with a normal size distribution, those 2.1–4.7 μm dominated, accounting for 20–40 %. Alternaria, Cladosporium, Chaetomium, and Aspergillus were found abundant in most environments studied here. Viable microbial load per unit of particulate matter was also shown to vary significantly with the sampling environments. The results from this study suggested that different environments even with similar levels of total microbial cuturable aerosol concentrations could present different inhalation risks due to different bioaerosol particle size distribution and composition. This work fills literature gaps regarding bioaerosol size and composition-based exposure risks in different human dwellings in contrast to a vast body of total bioaerosol levels.
- Andersen, A. A. (1958). New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne parcticles. Journal of Bacteriology, 76, 471–484.
- Chang, C. W., Chung, H., Huang, C. F., & Su, H. J. J. (2001). Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(1), 155–161. CrossRef
- Douwes, J., Thorne, P., Pearce, N., & Heederik, D. (2003). Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 47(3), 187–200. CrossRef
- Fang, Z. G., Ouyang, Z. Y., Zheng, H., & Wang, X. K. (2008). Concentration and size distribution of culturable airborne microorganisms in outdoor environments in Beijing, China. Aerosol Science and Technology, 42(5), 325–334. CrossRef
- Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. New York: Wiley.
- Gόrny, R. L., Dutkiewicz, J., & Krysinska-Traczyk, E. (1999). Size distribution of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in indoor air. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 6(2), 105–113.
- Harold, C. B., Constantine, J. A., & Theodore, D. (1980). Morphology of plants and fungi. New York: Harper & Row.
- Hyvarinen, A., Vahteristo, M., Meklin, T., Jantunen, M., Nevalainen, A., & Moschandreas, D. (2001). Temporal and spatial variation of fungal concentrations in indoor air. Aerosol Science and Technology, 35(2), 688–695.
- ICRP. (1994). Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 66. Tarrytown: Elsevier Science.
- Just, N., Kirychuk, S., Gilbert, Y., Léourneau, V., Veillette, M., Singh, B., et al. (2011). Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. Environmental Research, 111(4), 492–498. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.009. CrossRef
- Kim, K. Y., & Kim, C. N. (2007). Airborne microbiological characteristics in public buildings of Korea. Building and Environment, 42(5), 2188–2196. CrossRef
- Klanova, K., & Hollerova, J. (2003). Hospital indoor environment: screening for micro-organisms and particulare matter. Indoor and Built Environment, 12(1–2), 61–67. CrossRef
- Lee, S., Choi, B., Yi, S. M., & Ko, G. (2009). Characterization of microbial community during Asian dust events in Korea. Science of the Total Environment, 407(20), 5308–5314. CrossRef
- Li, C. S., & Hou, P. A. (2003). Bioaerosol characteristics in hospital clean rooms. Science of the Total Environment, 305(1–3), 169–176. CrossRef
- Li, K. J., Dong, S. F., Wu, Y., & Yao, M. S. (2010). Comparison of the biological content of air samples collected at ground level and at higher elevation. Aerobiologia, 26(3), 233–244. CrossRef
- Maki, T., Susuki, S., Kobayashi, F., Kakikawa, M., Yamada, M., Higashi, T., et al. (2008). Phylogenetic diversity and vertical distribution of a halobacterial community in the atmosphere of an Asian dust (KOSA) source region, Dunhuang City. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 1(2), 81–89. CrossRef
- Meklin, T., Reponen, T., Toivola, M., Koponen, V., Husman, T., Hyvarinen, A., et al. (2002). Size distributions of airborne microbes in moisture-damaged and reference school buildings of two construction types. Atmospheric Environment, 36(39–40), 6031–6039. CrossRef
- Muyzer, G., Dewaal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993). Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(3), 695–700.
- Nasir, Z. A., & Colbeck, I. (2010). Assessment of bacterial and fungal aerosol in different residential settings. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 211(1–4), 367–377. CrossRef
- Nehme, B., Letourneau, V., Forster, R. J., Veillette, M., & Duchaine, C. (2008). Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings, and assessment of the seasonal effect. Environmental Microbiology, 10(3), 665–675. CrossRef
- Otten, W., Gilligan, C. A., Watts, C. W., Dexter, A. R., & Hall, D. (1999). Continuity of air-filled pores and invasion thresholds for a soilborne fungal plant pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(13), 1803–1810. CrossRef
- Polymenakou, P. N., Mandalakis, M., Stephanou, E. G., & Tselepides, A. (2008). Particle size distribution of airborne microorganisms and pathogens during an intense African dust event in the eastern Mediterranean. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(3), 292–296. CrossRef
- Predicala, B. Z., Urban, J. E., Maghirang, R. G., Jerez, S. B., Goodband, R. D. (2002). Assessment of bioaerosols in swine barns by filtration and impaction.Current Microbiology, 44(2), 136–140.
- Reponen, T., Hyvarinen, A., Ruuskanen, J., Raunemaa, T., & Nevalainen, A. (1994). Comparison of concentrations and size distributions of fungal spores in buildings with and without mould problems. Journal of Aerosol Science, 25(8), 1595–1603. CrossRef
- Reponen, T., Willeke, K., Grinshpun, S., & Nevalainen, A. (2011). Biological particle sampling. In P. Kulkarni, P. Baron, & K. Willeke (Eds.), Aerosol measurement, principles, techniques, and applications (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.
- Robertson, L. D. (1997). Monitoring viable fungal and bacterial bioaerosol concentrations to identify acceptable levels for common indoor environments. Indoor and Built Environment, 6(5), 295–300. CrossRef
- Sanchez-Monedero, M. A., Stentiford, E. I., & Urpilainen, S. T. (2005). Bioaerosol generation at large-scale green waste composting plants. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 55(5), 612–618. CrossRef
- Shelton, B. G., Kirkland, K. H., Flanders, W. D., & Morris, G. K. (2002). Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(4), 1743–1753. CrossRef
- Stewart, S. L., Grinshpun, S. A., Willeke, K., Terzieva, S., Ulevicius, V., & Donnelly, J. (1995). Effect of impact stress on microbial recovery on an agar surface. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61(4), 1232–1239.
- Monitoring of bioaerosol inhalation risks in different environments using a six-stage Andersen sampler and the PCR-DGGE method
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume 185, Issue 5 , pp 3993-4003
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Six-stage Andersen sampler
- Bacterial and fungal aerosols
- Inhalation risks
- Industry Sectors