Efficiency evaluation of sewage treatment plants with different technologies in Delhi (India)
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Physical, chemical and microbiological efficiencies of Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) located in Delhi’s watershed in context of different treatment technologies employed in these plants have been determined. There were in all seventeen STPs treating domestic wastewater which were studied over a period of 12 months. These STPs were based on Conventional Activated sludge process (ASP), Extended aeration (Ex. Aeration), physical, chemical and biological removal treatment (BIOFORE) and oxidation pond treatment process. Results suggests that except “Mehrauli” STP which was based on Extended aeration process and “Oxidation pond”, effluents from all other STPs exceeded FC standard of 103 MPN/100 ml for unrestricted irrigation criteria set by National river conservation directorate (NRCD). Actual integrated efficiency (IEa) of each STP was evaluated and compared with the standard integrated efficiency (IEs) based upon physical, biological and microbiological removal efficiencies depending upon influent sewage characteristics. The best results were obtained for STPs employing extended aeration, BIOFORE and oxidation pond treatment process thus can be safely used for irrigation purposes.
- American public health association (APHA) (1998). Standard methods for the examination of waters and wastewaters (20th edn). Washington, DC, USA.
- Andreadakis, A., Mamais, D., Gavalaki, E., & Panagiotopoulou, V. (2003). Evaluation of treatment schemes appropriate for wastewater reuse in Greece. Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 1–8.
- Colmenarejo, M. F., Rubio, A., Sanchez, E., Vicente, J., Gracia, M. G., & Bojra, R. (2006). Evaluaton of municipal wastewater treatment plants with different technologies at Las-Rozas, Madrid (Spain). Journal of Environmental Management, 81, 399–404. CrossRef
- CPHEEO, Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization (1993). Manual on sewerage and sewage treatment (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development.
- Foundation for Greentech Environmental Systems (2004). Case study on sewage treatment plants and low-cost sanitation under river action plans. New Delhi.
- Garcia-Amrisen, T., & Servais, P. (2006). Respective contribution of point and non-point sources of E.coli and Enterococci in large urbanized watershed (the seine river, France). Journal of Environment Management, 82, 512–518. CrossRef
- Gray, N. F. (1983). Ponding of random plastic filter medium due to fungus Subbaromcyes splendens Hesseltine in the treatment of sewage. Water Research, 17, 1295–1302. CrossRef
- Khan, A., Khan P., Wiegant, W., Schaapman, J. E., & Sikka, B. (2001). Implementation of UASB technology in river conservation projects in India — Policy development for wastewater treatment. Paper presented in 9th International Conference on Anaerobic Digestion, Belgium.
- Koivunen, J., Siitonen, A., & Heinonen-Tanski, H. (2003). Elimination of enteric bacteria in biological-chemical wastewater treatment and tertiary filtration units. Water Research, 37, 690–698. CrossRef
- Leslie Grady, P. C., Daigger, T. G., & Lim, C. H. (1999). Fundamentals of biochemical operations. Biological wastewater treatment (pp. 26–28). New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Maeng, S. K., Ahn, K. H., Kim, K. P., Song, K. G., & Park, K. Y. (2006). Compressible synthetic dual-medium filtration of wastewater effluents for water reuse. Water Practice Technology, 1.
- NRCD (2005). Ministry of Environment and Forest Annual Report 2001–2002. Retrieved from http://envfor.nic.in/report/0102/chap06.html.
- Pommepuy, M., Guillaud, J. F., Dupray, E., Guyader, F. L., & Cormier, M. (1992). Enteric bacteria survival factors. Water Science and Technology, 25, 93–103.
- Sato, N., Okubo, T., Onodera, T., Ohashi, A., & Harada, H. (2006). Prospects for a self-sustainable sewage treatment system: A case study on full-scale UASB system in India’s Yamuna River Basin. Journal of Environmental Management, 80, 198–207. CrossRef
- US EPA, Environmental Protection Agency (2004). Guidelines for water reuse. Report No. EPA/625/R-04/108, Table 4–13, pp 167–170. Retrieved November 9, 2007 from http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/625r04108/625r04108.pdf.
- YAP Yamuna action plan (2006a). Retrieved November 9, 2007 from http://yap.nic.in/yamuna-in-delhi.asp
- YAP Yamuna action plan (2006b). Retrieved November 9, 2007 from http://yap.nic.in/delhi-slums.asp.
- Efficiency evaluation of sewage treatment plants with different technologies in Delhi (India)
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume 153, Issue 1-4 , pp 293-305
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Wastewater treatment plants
- Activated sludge process
- Fecal coliform
- Fecal streptococcus
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India
- 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India
- 3. Cereve, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Champs sur Marne, Marne la vallée, Paris, 77455, France