The uneasy case for rehabilitating small firms under the 1997-reorganization law in Belgium: evidence from reorganization plans
- Bart Leyman
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Using a sample of small Belgian firms that reorganized under the 1997 Law on Judicial Composition, I empirically review the law’s effectiveness to rehabilitate distressed debtors. The econometric findings show that firms with less pre-bankruptcy operational losses and a better cash position are more likely to successfully execute their reorganization plan and that certain debt restructuring measures can contribute to firm rescue. Despite these positive findings, many firms still failed to reorganise under the 1997-reorganization law, which resulted in constant criticism on its effectiveness leading up to its recent replacement in 2009. My data also shows that within the former reorganization procedure the Belgian debtor was faced with high debt instalment payments compared to international practice and that successful plan execution relied too much on the uncertain realization of the operational cash flow projections. In discussing the legal framework of the new Law on Corporate Continuity enacted in 2009—replacing the 1997-law—I argue that this new law is a more effective legislation to save distressed businesses.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Altman, E. I. (1984). A further empirical investigation of the bankruptcy cost question. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1067–1089. CrossRef
- Baird, D. G., Bris, A., & Zhu, N. (2007). The dynamics of large and small chapter 11 cases: An empirical study. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 05-29.
- Baird, D. G., & Morrison, E. R. (2001). Bankruptcy decision making. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17(2), 356–372. CrossRef
- Bris, A., Welch, I., & Zhu, N. (2006). The costs of bankruptcy: Chapter 7 liquidation versus Chapter 11 reorganization. Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1253–1303. CrossRef
- Couwenberg, O., & de Jong, A. (2008). Costs and recovery rates in the Dutch liquidation-based bankruptcy system. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 105–127. CrossRef
- Davydenko, S., & Franks, J. (2008). Do bankruptcy codes matter? A study of defaults in France, Germany and the UK. Journal of Finance, 63(2), 565–608. CrossRef
- Dewaelheyns, N., & Van Hulle, C. (2009). Filtering speed in a continental European reorganization procedure. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(4), 375–387. CrossRef
- Dewaelheyns, N., & Van Hulle, C. (2010). Bankruptcy reform: Evidence from a survey among judges and receivers. Applied Economics Letters, 17(14), 1367–1371. CrossRef
- Eisenberg, T., & Tagashira, S. (1994). Should we abolish Chapter 11? The evidence from Japan. Journal of Legal Studies, 23(1), 111–157. CrossRef
- Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (1994). Will the bankruptcy reform work? An empirical analysis of financial reorganization in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 20(3), 265–277. CrossRef
- Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (1995). The creditor’s financial reorganization decision: New evidence form Canadian data. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11(1), 112–126.
- Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (1999). Should we abolish Chapter 11? Evidence from Canada. Journal of Legal Studies, 28(1), 233–257. CrossRef
- Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (2004). Empirical estimates of filtering failure in Court-supervised reorganization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(1), 143–164. CrossRef
- Franks, J. R., & Sussman, O. (2005). Financial distress and bank restructuring of small to medium size UK companies. The Review of Finance, 9(1), 65–96. CrossRef
- Franks, J. R., & Torous, W. N. (1989). An empirical investigation of U.S. firms in reorganization. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 747–769. CrossRef
- Hotchkiss, E. S. (1995). Post bankruptcy performance and management turnover. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 3–21. CrossRef
- Jensen-Conklin, S. (1992). Do confirmed Chapter 11 plans consummate? The results of a study and analysis of the law. Commercial Law Journal, 97(3), 297–331.
- Kahl, M. (2001). Financial distress as a selection mechanism: Evidence from the United States. Anderson School, Finance Working Paper No. 16-01.
- Kahl, M. (2002). Economic distress, financial distress, and dynamic liquidation. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 135–168. CrossRef
- Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387. CrossRef
- LoPucki, L., & Doherty, J. (2004). The determinants of professional fees in large bankruptcy reorganization cases. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(1), 111–141. CrossRef
- Morgan, B. K. (2000). Should the sovereign be paid first? A comparative analysis of the priority for tax claims in bankruptcy. The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 74, 461–508.
- Morrison, E. R. (2007). Bankruptcy decision making: an empirical study of continuation bias in Chapter 11. Journal of Law and Economics, 50(2), 381–419. CrossRef
- Sandeep, D., Kose, J., Manju, P., & Gabriel, R. (2003). Debtor-in-Possession financing and bankruptcy resolution: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 259–280. CrossRef
- Sundgren, S. (1998). Does a reorganization law improve the efficiency of the insolvency law? The Finnish experience. European Journal of Law and Economics, 6(2), 177–198. CrossRef
- Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1999). Financial characteristics of businesses in bankruptcy. The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 73, 499–589.
- Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (2007). Chapter 11: Conventional wisdom and reality. University of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 125.
- Weiss, L. (1990). Bankruptcy resolution: Direct costs and violation of priority claims. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 285–314. CrossRef
- Weiss, L., & Wruck, K. (1998). Information problems, conflicts of interest and asset stripping: Chapter 11’s failure in the case of Eastern Airlines. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 55–97. CrossRef
- White, M. J. (1994). Corporate bankruptcy as a filtering device: Chapter 11 reorganizations and out-of-court debt restructurings. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 10(2), 268–295.
About this Article
- The uneasy case for rehabilitating small firms under the 1997-reorganization law in Belgium: evidence from reorganization plans
European Journal of Law and Economics
Volume 34, Issue 3 , pp 533-560
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Court-supervised reorganization
- Insolvency regulation
- Reorganization plan
- Industry Sectors
- Bart Leyman (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium