Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Explanatory factors of the relationship between gender diversity and corporate performance

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years a growing interest in gender diversity has arisen in the business context, and a significant number of research studies have analysed its effect on corporate performance. Nonetheless, these studies have not led to conclusive results, perhaps owing to the complexity of the relationship. The present work focuses on analysing two possible justifications of the contradictory effects of gender diversity on company performance: the business context and the optimum size of the female presence in decision-making bodies. The results obtained show that when working conditions and academic background are similar, women achieve better performance in sectors traditionally dominated by men. Moreover, to take the best advantage of gender diversity it is recommended that boards of directors should be balanced or have a slightly higher female presence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank an anonymous referee for this comment.

References

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2004). Gender diversity in the boardroom. ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, 58.

  • Adler, R. D. (2001). Women in the executive suite. Correlate to high profits. Working Paper, European Project on Equal Pay. Pepperdine University.

  • Andrés, P., Azofra, V., & López, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appold, S. J., Siengthai, S., & Kasarda, J. D. (1998). The employment of women managers and professionals in an emerging economy: Gender inequality as an organizational practice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 538–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhren, O., & Ström, R. (2005). The value-creating board: Theory and evidence, Research Report 8/2005. Department of Financial Economics: Norwegian School of Management.

  • Bozec, R., & Dia, M. (2007). Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1734–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). The influence of gender on Spanish Boards of Directors: An empirical analysis. WP-EC 20072008. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas.

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., D’Souza, F., & Simpson, W. G. (2007). The Diversity of corporate board committees and financial performance. SSRN, September 20, pp 1–30.

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 514–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Rietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 1, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K. M., & Keys, P. Y. (2003). Stock returns and the promotion of workforce diversity. Working Paper. University of Delaware.

  • Erhardt, L. N., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, Ch. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: Does gender matter? Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 8(2), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frink, D. D., Robinson, R. K., Reithel, B., Arthur, M. M., Ammeter, A. P., Ferris, G. R., et al. (2003). Gender demography and organization performance. A two-study investigation with convergence. Group and Organization Management, 28(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, J., & Winlund, H. (2000). Boards of directors in small and medium-sized industrial firms: Examining of the board’s working style on board task performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(4), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2008). Voluntary and compulsory information disclosed online: Effect of industry concentration and other explanatory factors. Online Information Review, 32(5), 596–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2009). La eficacia del gobierno corporativo y la divulgación de información en Internet. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 15(1), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., García Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Spanish Accounting ReviewRevista de Contabilidad, 13(1) (forthcoming).

  • García Sánchez, I. M. (2010a). The effectiveness of corporate governance: Board structure and business technical efficiency in Spain. Central European Journal of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10100-009-0112-4.

  • García Sánchez, I. M. (2010b). Factores Determinantes de la presencia de un FEFC en el Comité de Auditoría. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (forthcoming).

  • García Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez Domínguez, L., & Gallego Álvarez, I. (2008). La influencia del consejo de administración en la adopción de un código ético. Revista de Contabilidad, 11(2), 93–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. E., & Hotchkiss, J. L. (2003). Which Industries are the best employers for women? An application of a new equal opportunity index, Working Paper. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy Management Review, 9, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L., & Maier, N. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno de la Maza, F. J., & Redondo Cristóbal, M. (2007). Diversidad de género en el consejo de administración y características económico-financieras de las empresas. Paper presented at XIV Congreso de la Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas, September 19–21, Valencia.

  • Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Board of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurkus, A. F., Park, J. Ch., & Woodard, L. S. (2008). Gender diversity, firm performance, and environment. Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1085109.

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Th., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., et al. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, H. A., Miller, A., & Judge, W. Q. (1997). Diversification and top management team complementary: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management Journal, 18, 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, H., & Park, D. (2005). A few good women-on-top management teams. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1712–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A., & Folker, C. A. (2002). When he and she sell seashells: Exploring the relationship between management team, gender-balance and small firm performance. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, D. (1986). GOGOs, YOYOs, and DODOs: Company directors and industry performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, D., & Birley, S. (1988). The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. (1983). The relationship of internal versus external orientations to financial measures of strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 4(4), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J., & Zahra, S. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado, J. M., Gallego, I., & García, I. M. (2009a). Stakeholder reengagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: The ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado, J. M., García, I. M., & Gallego, I. (2009b). Características del consejo de administración e información en materia de responsabilidad social corporativa. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 38(141), 107–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randöy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Norway: Nordic Innovation Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 187–202. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0035-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2010). Determinantes de la divulgación voluntaria de información estratégica en Internet: un estudio de las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19(1), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. (2004). Stakeholder orientation vs shareholder value—A matter of contractual failures. European Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, Ch. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2, 500 Danish firms. International Journal of Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, P. (2001). The impact of boards on strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 627–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, H., & Slocum, J. (1984). Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. Journal of Management, 19(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance—An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. C. (1983). Corporate leadership: Boards, directors, and strategy. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne, T. M., Cycyota, C. S., & Ferrante, C. J. (2007). Wall street reaction to women in IPOs: An examination of gender diversity in top management teams. Group and Organization Management, 32(5), 524–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52, 574–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. (1987). Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Rodríguez-Domínguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., García-Sánchez, IM. & Gallego-Álvarez, I. Explanatory factors of the relationship between gender diversity and corporate performance. Eur J Law Econ 33, 603–620 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-010-9144-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-010-9144-4

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation