Corporate Governance: Towards a Theory of Regulatory Shift
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Providing effective corporate governance regulation and controls is a contemporary challenge to all law makers. There exists a need to restore investor confidence while seeking to facilitate and encourage enterprise. This paper reflects on the traditional choice between shareholder versus stakeholder models of corporate governance and suggests that these are inappropriate in the light of emerging news theories of the firm. Instead this paper suggests that law makers should accommodate a shift away from the traditional paradigms of these models in favour of a processual approach of governance. This would require a recognition of the tensions that exist in the regulation of corporate governance and invite the application of a collibratory process to the control of governance. The development and reform of directors’ duties and liabilities, in the UK, is provided as an illustration of the need for the recognised application of a collibratory process. Within that we also consider the application of the economists concept of ‘rent-seeking’ and the conflict between private property rights and public interference.
- Berglof, E. (1997). “Reforming Corporate Governance: Redirecting the European Agenda.” Economic Policy. 12, 91–123. CrossRef
- Berle, A. A. & Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: The Macmillan Company.
- Bishop, M. (1994). “Corporate Governance.” The Economist. 29, 3–18 (in survey section).
- Blair, M. M. (1995). Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-first Century. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
- Buchahan, J. M. & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbon; University of Michigan Press.
- Chia, R. (2001). A Processual Perspective on Corporate Governance. Published in British Academy of Management Conference Proceedings, 2001. Reepham: Niche Publications.
- Cadbury Committee. (1992). Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee.
- Deakin, S. & Cook, J. (2000). “Economic Effects of Criminal and Civil Sanctions in the Context of Company Law.” 2000 at: www.dti.gov.uk/cld/review.htm
- Dine, J. (2000). The Governance of Corporate Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Donaldson, T. (1989). The Ethics of International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Dunsire, A. (1990, 1993). “Holistic Governance.” Public Policy and Administration. 5(1), 3–18; “Modes of Governance.” In Kooiman, J. (ed.). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage.
- Fligstein, N. & Freeland, R. (1995). “Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives on Corporate Organisation.” Annual Review of Sociology. 21, 21–43. CrossRef
- Friedman, A. & Miles, S. (2002). “Developing Stakeholder Theory.” Journel of Management Studies. 39(1), 1–21. CrossRef
- Gamble, A. & Kelly, G. (2001). “Shareholder Value and the Stakeholder Debate in the UK.” Corporate Governance. 9(2), 110–117. CrossRef
- Greenbury Committee. (1995). Directors’ Remuneration: Report of A Study Group. London: Gee.
- Hampel Committee. (1998). Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report. London: Gee.
- Handy, C. (1993). “What Is a Company for?” Corporate Governance. 1(1), 14–16.
- HLG. (2002). Report of the High Level Group of Company Law Experts and Issues Related to Takeover Bids. Brussels.
- Hawley, J. P. & Williams, A. T. (1996). “Corporate Governance in the United States: The Risk of Fiduciary Capitalism—a Review of the Literature.” The First Prize of Lens 1996 Corporate Governance Paper Competition. available on-line at: http://www.lens-library.com/info/competition.html.
- Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors. DTI, London.
- James, A., Kirkbride, J., & Letza, S. (2005). “Railtrack and Responsibility: Does the Criminal Law have a Role in the Corporate Setting?” Pending, International Journal of Business, Governance and Ethics.
- Jessop, B. (2002). “Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety and Requisite Irony.” In H. Hang (ed.). Governance, Governmentality and Democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Kakabadse, A. & Kakabadse, N. (2001). The Geopolitics of Governance. Hampshire: Palgrave.
- Keasey, K., Thompson, S., & Wright, M. (1997). “Introduction: The Corporate Governance Problem—Competing Diagnoses and Solutions.” In Keasey, K., Thompson, S., & Wright, M. (eds.). Corporate Governance: Economic and Financial Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kirkbride, J. (2001). “Regulation, Competition and Meta—Regulation—Reflections on the UK Experience.” Global Business and Economics Review—Anthology. 513–524.
- Kooiman, W. (1993). “Governance and Governaability: Using Complexity, Dynamics and Diversity.” In Idem (ed.) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage, pp. 35–48.
- Kreuger, A. O. (1974). “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.” American Economic Review 64, 291–303
- Letza, S. & Smallman, C. (2001). “In Pure Water There Is a Pleasure Begrudged by None: On Ownership, Accountability and Control in a Privatised Utility.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 12(1), 65–85. CrossRef
- Letza, S. & Sun, X. (2002). “Corporate Governance: Paradigms, Dilemmas and Beyond.” Poznan University Economic Review. 2(1), 43–59.
- Morgan, G. (1997). Images of Organisation, 2nd edition. California: Sage.
- MCLR. (1998–2000). “Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy (March 1998); the Strategic Framework (February 1999); Developing the Framework (March 2000); the Final Report (June 2001) DTI, London.
- Mueller, F. (1995). “Organisational Governance and Employee Co-operation: Can We Learn from Economics?” Human Relations. 48(10), 1217–1235.
- O’Sullivan, M. A. (2000). Contests for Corporate Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Poole, M., Mansfield, R., & Mendes, P. (2001). Two Decades of Management. London: Institute of Management.
- Prabhaker, S. (1998). “Governance and Stakeholding.” New Economy. 5(2), 119–122. CrossRef
- Preston, L. E. & Sapienza, H. J. (1990). “Stakeholder Management and Corporate Performance.” The Journal of Behavioural Economics. 19(4), 361–375. CrossRef
- Rajan, R. G. & Zingales, L. (2000). “The Governance of the New Enterprise.” In Vives, X. (ed.) Corporate Governance: Theoretical & Empirical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Salacuse, J. W. (2002). “European Corporations American Style?” Governance, Culture, and Convergence.
- Tullock, G. (1967). “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft.” Western Economic Journal. S, 224–232.
- Turnbull Committee. (1999). Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code. London: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
- Turnbull, S. (1997). “Corporate Governance: Its Scope, Concerns and Theories.” Corporate Governance. 5(4), 180–205. CrossRef
- Villiers, C. & Boyle. (2000). “Corporate Governance and the Approach to Regulation.” In Macgregor, L., Prosser, T., & Billiers, C. (eds.). Regulation and Markets Beyond 2000. Ashgate: London.
- Zingales, L. (2000). “In Search of New Foundations.” The Journal of Finance. LV. 4, 1623–1653.
- Corporate Governance: Towards a Theory of Regulatory Shift
European Journal of Law and Economics
Volume 20, Issue 1 , pp 57-70
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- corporate governance
- theory of the firm
- Industry Sectors