Identification of operating mediation and mechanism in the sufficient-component cause framework
First Online: 30 March 2011 Received: 26 October 2010 Accepted: 08 March 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: Suzuki, E., Yamamoto, E. & Tsuda, T. Eur J Epidemiol (2011) 26: 347. doi:10.1007/s10654-011-9568-3 Abstract
The assessment of mediation and mechanism is one way to more deeply explore cause-effect relationships, providing a stronger test and explanation of the observed associations. Most previous studies have described direct and indirect effects in terms of potential outcomes and response types, exploring mediation analysis in the counterfactual (= potential-outcome) framework. A recent paper by Hafeman (Eur J Epidemiol 23(11):711–721,
) provided a conceptual description of mediation in the sufficient-component cause framework, and VanderWeele (Eur J Epidemiol 24(5):217–224, 2008 ) explored the distinctions and relationships between the concepts of mediation and mechanism. This study builds on this prior work and demonstrates that further insight can be given by elucidating the concepts of mediation and mechanism in the sufficient-component cause framework, distinguishing their operation from presence. The careful consideration of the concepts of mediation and mechanism can clarify the relationship between them. Then, the present article describes how investigators can identify mediation as well as mechanism by showing their correspondence with direct and indirect effects in the counterfactual framework. This study also demonstrates how a researcher can decompose the total effect into the effect due to mediated paths and the effect due to non-mediated paths in terms of the probabilities of background factors of sufficient causes. 2009 Keywords Causal inference Counterfactual Direct and indirect effects Mechanism Mediation Sufficient cause Abbreviations PDE
Pure direct effect
Pure indirect effect
Total direct effect
Total indirect effect
Pearl J. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Hafeman DM, Schwartz S. Opening the black box: a motivation for the assessment of mediation. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):838–45.
Hafeman DM. A sufficient cause based approach to the assessment of mediation. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(11):711–21.
VanderWeele TJ. Mediation and mechanism. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(5):217–24.
Hafeman DM. “Proportion explained”: a causal interpretation for standard measures of indirect effect? Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(11):1443–8.
Hafeman DM, VanderWeele TJ. Alternative assumptions for the identification of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2011. doi:
Little RJ, Rubin DB. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:121–45.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Poole C, et al. Causation and causal inference. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 5–31.
Greenland S, Rothman KJ, Lash TL. Measures of effect and measures of association. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 51–70.
Hernán MA. A definition of causal effect for epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(4):265–71.
Maldonado G, Greenland S. Estimating causal effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(2):422–9.
Greenland S, Lash TL, Rothman KJ. Concepts of interaction. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 71–83.
Greenland S, Poole C. Invariants and noninvariants in the concept of interdependent effects. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988;14(2):125–9.
Miettinen OS. Causal and preventive interdependence. Elementary principles. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1982;8(3):159–68.
Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, van der Laan MJ. Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology. 2006;17(3):276–84.
Robins JM. Semantics of causal DAG models and the identification of direct and indirect effects. In: Green PJ, Hjort NL, Richardson S, editors. Highly Structured Stocahstic Systems. Oxford, New York: Oxford statistical science series 2003;27:70–81.
VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Stat Interface. 2009;2(4):457–68.
Robins JM, Greenland S. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3(2):143–55.
VanderWeele TJ. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4):540–51.
Rothman KJ. Causes. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;104(6):587–92.
Khoury MJ, Flanders WD, Greenland S, et al. On the measurement of susceptibility in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(1):183–90.
Gatto NM, Campbell UB. Redundant causation from a sufficient cause perspective. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2010;7(1):5.
VanderWeele TJ. Attributable fractions for sufficient cause interactions. Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):5.
Greenland S, Robins JM. Conceptual problems in the definition and interpretation of attributable fractions. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(6):1185–97.
Robins JM, Greenland S. Estimability and estimation of excess and etiologic fractions. Stat Med. 1989;8(7):845–59.
Robins JM, Greenland S. The probability of causation under a stochastic model for individual risk. Biometrics. 1989;45(4):1125–38.
VanderWeele TJ. Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2009;20(1):18–26.
Vansteelandt S. Estimating direct effects in cohort and case-control studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20(6):851–60.
VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(12):1339–48.
Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(4):309–34.
Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T. Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):51–71.
Flanders WD. On the relationship of sufficient component cause models with potential outcome (counterfactual) models. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(12):847–53.
VanderWeele TJ, Hernán MA. From counterfactuals to sufficient component causes and vice versa. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(12):855–8.
Suzuki E, Yamamoto E, Tsuda T. On the link between sufficient-cause model and potential-outcome model. Epidemiology. 2011;22(1):131–2.
Greenland S, Brumback B. An overview of relations among causal modelling methods. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(5):1030–7.
PubMed CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011