Selection by socioeconomic factors into the Danish National Birth Cohort
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Background Low participation at recruitment to the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) has raised concern about non-participation bias. Objective To study the socioeconomic pattern of participation to the DNBC. Methods Independently of the DNBC, we identified the DNBC source population in two geographical areas of Denmark by means of local birth registers with full coverage. Socioeconomic information came from national registers, and the source population consisted of 48,560 births including 15,290 participating women. For every socioeconomic characteristic, we estimated the prevalence ratio [prevalence (participants)/prevalence (source population)] which corresponds to the relative representation of the group (presented in percentages with 95% confidence intervals). Results The overall participation rate was 31%. Women outside the work force or with no further education than compulsory school were underrepresented in the DNBC by 62% (59%; 64%) and 43% (41%; 45%), respectively. Also, women were underrepresented by 18% (13%; 23%) if they were unemployed, by 22% (20%; 24%) if they were in the lowest income group, 38% (35%; 40%) if they received a high proportion of social benefits, and 28% (24%; 31%) if they were singles. Particularly women with low resources according to two socioeconomic factors were strongly underrepresented, typically by 50–67%. Conclusion Groups with low socioeconomic resources in terms of education, occupation, income and civil status are underrepresented in the DNBC compared to the background population. These discrepancies must be taken into account when results from the DNBC and other cohorts of pregnant women are interpreted—especially when descriptive results are presented.
- Hartge P. Raising response rates: getting to yes. Epidemiology. 1999;105–7.
- Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006;17(4):413. CrossRef
- Austin MA, Criqui MH, Barrett-Connor E, Holdbrook MJ. The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114(1):137–43.
- Stang A. Nonresponse research—an underdeveloped field in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18(10):929–32. CrossRef
- Lundberg I, Damström Thakker K, Hällström T, Forsell Y. Determinants of non-participation, and the effects of non-participation on potential cause-effect relationships, in the PART study on mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(6):475–83. CrossRef
- Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort—its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(4):300–7. CrossRef
- Shahar E, Folsom AR, Jackson R. The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6(6):498–506. CrossRef
- Boeing H, Korfmann A, Bergmann MM. Recruitment procedures of EPIC-Germany. Ann Nutr Metab. 1999;43:205–15. CrossRef
- Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles JE, Dobson AJ. Women’s Health Australia: recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study. Women Health. 1998;28(1):23–40.
- Goldberg M, Chastang JF, Leclerc A, Zins M, Bonenfant S, Bugel I, et al. Socioeconomic, demographic, occupational, and health factors associated with participation in a long-term epidemiologic survey: a prospective study of the French GAZEL cohort and its target population. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
- Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, Ojanlatva A, Rautava P, Helenius H, et al. Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(11):991–9. CrossRef
- Olsen A, Tjonneland A, Engholm G, Overvad K. Socio-economic determinants for participation in the Danish EPIC Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. IARC scientific publications. 2002;15655.
- Sogaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E, Thelle D. The Oslo Health Study: the impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health. 2004;3(1):3. CrossRef
- Stang A, Moebus S, Dragano N, Beck EM, Möhlenkamp S, Schmermund A, et al. Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf recall study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(6):489–96. CrossRef
- Boshuizen HC, Viet AL, Picavet HSJ, Botterweck A, van Loon AJM. Non-response in a survey of cardiovascular risk factors in the Dutch population: determinants and resulting biases. Public Health. 2006;120(4):297–308. CrossRef
- Fejer R, Hartvigsen J, Kyvik K, Jordan A, Christensen H, Høilund-Carlsen P. The Funen neck and chest pain study: analysing non-response bias by using national vital statistic data. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(3):171–80. CrossRef
- Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Piha K, Lallukka T. Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212–5. CrossRef
- Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Boll K, Stripp C. Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in diet, cancer and health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57, 053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(4):432–41. CrossRef
- van Heuvelen MJ, Hochstenbach JB, Brouwer WH, de Greef MH, Zijlstra GA, van Jaarsveld E, et al. Differences between participants and non-participants in an RCT on physical activity and psychological interventions for older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(3):236.
- Boesen E, Boesen S, Christensen S, Johansen C. Comparison of participants and non-participants in a randomized psychosocial intervention study among patients with malignant melanoma. Psychosomatics. 2007;48(6):510. CrossRef
- Huang N, Shih S, Chang H, Chou Y. Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents? BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):18. CrossRef
- Det Centrale Personregister [Internet]. Det Centrale Personregister. 2009 September 6; [cited 2009 Sep 6] Available from: http://www.cpr.dk/cpr/.
- Danmarks Statistik/Statistics Denmark. Danmarks Statistik [Internet]. Danmarks Statistik. 2009 September 6; [cited 2009 Sep 6] Available from: http://www.dst.dk/.
- Thygesen L. The register-based system of demographic and social statistics in Denmark. Stat J UN Econ Comm Eur. 1995;12(1):49.
- Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
- Hernán MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):615. CrossRef
- Selection by socioeconomic factors into the Danish National Birth Cohort
European Journal of Epidemiology
Volume 25, Issue 5 , pp 349-355
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Non participation
- Non-response bias
- Pregnant women
- Selection bias
- Socioeconomic status
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, Aarhus University, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, Building 1260, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
- 2. Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, Aarhus University, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark