Achinstein, P. (1983). *The nature of explanation*. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2004). Zero: A “none” number? *Teaching Children Mathematics, 11*(1), 38–41.

Balacheff, N. (2010). Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: A didactical perspective. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.),

*Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives* (pp. 115–136). New York: Springer.

CrossRefBall, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21*(2), 132–144.

CrossRefBall, D., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Phillips (Ed.), *Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, constructivism in education* (pp. 193–224). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Board of Studies NSW (2006).

*Mathematics K-6 syllabus*. Retrieved February 5, 2010 from

http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/files/maths/k6_maths_syl.pdf
De Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. *Pythagoras, 24*, 17–24.

Dreyfus, T. (1999). Why Johnny can’t prove.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38*(1–3), 85–109.

CrossRefEynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). Epistemic dimensions of students’ mathematics-related belief system.

*International Journal of Educational Research, 45*(1–2), 57–70.

CrossRefFischbein, E. (1987). *Intuition in science and mathematics*. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). *Revisiting mathematics education*. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Hanna, G. (1989). More than formal proof. *For the Learning of Mathematics, 9*(1), 20–25.

Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44*, 5–25.

CrossRefHealy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31*(4), 396–428.

CrossRefIsrael National Mathematics Curriculum (2006). Retrieved December 10, 2009, from

http://cms.education.gov.il
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), *The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures* (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Krummheuer, G. (2000). Mathematics learning in narrative classroom cultures: Studies of argumentation in primary mathematics education. *For the Learning of Mathematics, 20*(1), 22–32.

Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer.

*American Educational Research Journal, 27*(1), 29–63.

CrossRefLevenson, E. (2010). Fifth grade students’ use and preferences for mathematically and practically based explanations.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73*(2), 121–142.

CrossRefLevenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2009). Students’ perceived sociomathematical norms: The missing paradigm.

*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28*, 83–95.

CrossRefLevenson, E., Tsamir, P., & Tirosh, D. (2007). First and second graders’ use of mathematically-based and practically-based explanations for multiplication with zero. *Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 29*(2), 21–40.

Linchevsky, L., & Williams, J. (1999). Using intuition from everyday life in ‘filling’ the gap in children’s extension of their number concept to include the negative numbers.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39*, 131–147.

CrossRefMaher, C., & Martino, A. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27*(2), 194–214.

CrossRefMancosu, P. (2008). Explanation in mathematics. In E. Zalta (Ed.),

*The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy*. Retrieved July 2, 2010 from

http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/mathematics-explanation/
Mueller, M. (2009). The co-construction of arguments by middle-school students.

*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28*, 138–149.

CrossRefNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). *Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Nunokawa, K. (2010). Proof, mathematical problem-solving, and explanation in mathematics teaching. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.),

*Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives* (pp. 223–236). New York: Springer.

CrossRefPogliani, L., Randic, M., & Trinajstic, N. (1998). Much ado about nothing—an introductive inquiry about zero.

*International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 29*(5), 729–744.

CrossRefSeife, C. (2000). *Zero: The biography of a dangerous idea*. New York: Viking Penguin.

Tall, D. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. In M. Hoines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 4, pp. 281–288). Bergen, Norway: PME.

Tsamir, P., Sheffer, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). Intuitions and undefined operations: The case of division by zero. *Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 22*(1), 1–16.

Van Fraassen, B. (1980).

*The scientific image*. Oxford: Clarendon.

CrossRefVinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), *Advanced mathematical thinking*. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). *Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples*. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wilson, P. (2001). Zero: A special case. *Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School*, *6*(5), 300–303, 308–309.

Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), *Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education PME-25*, (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). Utrecht, the Netherlands: PME.

Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22*, 390–408.

CrossRefYackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1998). The interactive constitution of mathematical meaning in one second grade classroom: An illustrative example.

*The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17*, 469–488.

CrossRefZazkis, R., & Chernoff, E. J. (2008). What makes a counterexample exemplary?

*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68*(3), 195–208.

CrossRef