Learning mathematics—letting the pupils have their say
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Pupil voice is an emerging force for change and improvement in many UK schools, but what is not fully understood is how best to access pupil voice within the specific context of secondary mathematics departments. This paper presents a research project designed to use pupils as co-researchers in increasing knowledge about how to improve learning in mathematics. Pupils within the school were selected and trained as “Ambassadors” to understand and disseminate innovative ways of learning mathematics into their school environment and to act to allow the voice of all the pupils in their year group to be heard. The project was intended both to raise the pupils’ awareness of how learning mathematics could be different and to enable them to voice their newly informed opinions about how best they learned mathematics. The pupils’ current feelings about the way that they were taught mathematics were explored, but the focus of the project was on enabling the pupils to make informed decisions about how they felt their learning could be improved. The pupils’ awareness of different ways of learning mathematics was raised by introducing them to alternative teaching approaches. The data generated were initially analysed by the pupils themselves in order to inform their teachers about their views and subsequently constant comparison analysis resulted in the outcomes reported here. The outcomes indicate that the students could have an important role in enabling schools to develop their teaching and improve their pupils’ mathematical learning when that voice is both informed and authorised.
- Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge: Dialogos.
- Arnot, M., McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Reay, D. (2004). Consultation in the classroom: Developing a dialogue about teaching and learning. Cambridge: Pearson.
- Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. CrossRef
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- Bloomfield, A., & Vertes, B. (2005). People maths: Hidden depths. Derby: ATM.
- Clark, J., Dyson, A., Meagher, N., Robson, E., & Wootten, M. (2001). Young people as researchers: Possibilities, problems and politics. Leicester: Youth Work Press.
- Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14. CrossRef
- Dweck, C. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Lillington: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
- Esmonde, I., Brodie, K., Dookie, L., & Taleuchi, M. (2009). Social identities and opportunities to learn perspectives on group work. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2(2), 18–45.
- Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by males and females. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326. CrossRef
- Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141. CrossRef
- Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343–354. CrossRef
- Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting pupils: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge-Falmer.
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
- Jansen, A. (2006). Seventh graders’ motivation for participating in two discussion oriented mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 409–428. CrossRef
- Jaworski, B. (2010). The nature of mathematics. In S. Johnston-Wilder & C. Lee (Eds.), Leading practice and managing change in the mathematics department. St Albans: Tarquin Books.
- Johnston-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2010a). Mathematical resilience. MT, 218, 38–41.
- Johnston-Wilder, S. & Lee, C. (2010b). Developing mathemtical resilience, Paper presented at the BERA annual conference at Warwick University
- Kirby, P. (1999). Involving young researchers. York: York Publishing Services.
- Kleanthous, I. & Williams, J. (2011). Students’ dispositions to study further mathematics in higher education: The effect of students’ mathematics self-efficacy, paper presented at CERME 7, Reszow
- Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics—Assessment for learning in practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Mason, J. (1988). Learning and doing mathematics. London: Macmillan.
- McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 149–168. CrossRef
- Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge.
- Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is Mathematics T.I.R.E.D.? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345–366. CrossRef
- NCSL. (2007). Leading personalised learning in schools. Nottingham: NCSL.
- Ofsted. (2008). Understanding the score. London: Ofsted.
- Ofsted. (2009). The framework for school inspection. London: Oftsed.
- Pampaka, M., Kleanthous, I., Hutcheson, G., & Wake, G. (2011). Measuring mathematics self-efficacy as a learning outcome. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 169–190. CrossRef
- Quicke, J. (2003). Educating the pupil voice. Support for Learning, 18(2), 51–57. CrossRef
- Roberts, G. (2002). SET for Success: [online]. Available: http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/pubs/report.php?id=1440robert.
- Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13–57. CrossRef
- SooHoo, S. (1993). Students as partners in research and restructuring schools. The Educational Forum, 57, 386–392. CrossRef
- Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap. NY: Free Press.
- Swan, M. (2006). Collaborative learning in mathematics: A challenge to our beliefs and practices. Leicester: National Institute Of Adult Continuing Education.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk: Sharpe.
- Wiliam, D. (2008). Changing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 36–42.
- Young-Loveridge, J., Taylor, M., Sharma, S. & Hawera, J. (2005). Students’ perspectives on the nature of mathematics in Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development projects New Zealand: Commissioned research report.
- Learning mathematics—letting the pupils have their say
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Volume 83, Issue 2 , pp 163-180
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Pupil voice
- Changing learning
- Mathematical resilience
- Industry Sectors