, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 906–917

Do estuaries pose a toxic contamination risk for wading birds?


    • School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Portsmouth
  • L. A. Walker
    • NERC Centre for Ecology & HydrologyLancaster Environment Centre
  • R. F. Shore
    • NERC Centre for Ecology & HydrologyLancaster Environment Centre
  • S. E. A. le V. dit Durell
  • P. D. Howe
    • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
  • M. Taylor
    • Natural England

DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0352-z

Cite this article as:
Smith, J.T., Walker, L.A., Shore, R.F. et al. Ecotoxicology (2009) 18: 906. doi:10.1007/s10646-009-0352-z


The impact of potentially toxic chemicals on wildlife is commonly assessed by comparing the intake of the contaminant with the “no observable effects level” (NOAEL) of intake. It is known, however, that there are considerable uncertainties inherent in this method. This study presents a Monte-Carlo based model to assess the degree of risk posed to birds (dunlin, Calidris alpina) from important estuarine habitats, and to show the limitations of such risk assessments, particularly with regard to data availability. The model was applied to predict the uptake of metals (Hg, Pb) in this shorebird species in Poole Harbour and the Severn Estuary/Bristol Channel, UK, two internationally important shorebird habitats. The results show that in both areas, Pb and Hg concentrations may pose an ecologically relevant toxic risk to wading birds. For Pb, uncertainty in NOAEL values dominates the overall uncertainty. Use of lethal toxicity data (LD50/100) was investigated as a method for assessing sub-lethal impacts from Hg. It was found that this method led to a significant under-estimate of the potential impact of Hg contamination, compared with direct estimation of NOAEL.


MercuryLeadProbabilistic modellingEstuariesReproductive toxicityDunlinBird

Supplementary material

10646_2009_352_MOESM1_ESM.doc (194 kb)
(DOC 193 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009