Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 45–50

Comment on “Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay Due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial Assessment”

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10640-005-3783-x

Cite this article as:
Johnson, F.R. Environ Resource Econ (2006) 34: 45. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-3783-x

Abstract

There are very few studies that quantify the interactions and tradeoffs between statistical and cognitive efficiency in designing stated-choice studies. While a conceptual framework for evaluating cognitive strategies would be desirable, Hensher adopts a strictly empirical approach in this experiment. The success of the study must be evaluated in light of his aggregating attributes rather than controlling the number of attributes, asymmetry in the narrow-range and wide-range attributes, and lack of orthogonality between the number of attributes and number of alternatives. Nevertheless, Hensher challenges uncritical acceptance of any given set of design features and correctly insists that we confirm our experience with rigorous, quantitative experiments.

Keywords

choice experimentsexperimental designstated-choice methodsstated preferencetransportation economics

JEL classification

C25C93R41

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Triangle InstituteUSA