Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation
- Sasha A. Reese
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Over the last decade online education has emerged as a way for students and faculty to collaborate more freely, attain greater flexibility, and utilize new media to learn. The burning debate lies in whether online educational options are harmful to traditional education or offer endless benefits necessary to accommodate a 21st century learner. Supporters of virtual learning environments suggest that 21st century learners require the construction and creation capabilities offered through Web 2.0 to succeed while critics suggest that asynchronous interactions are not engaging and rigorous enough for higher education. A balanced online environment should provide a blend of both asynchronous and synchronous opportunities, which promote communication and collaboration among classmates and instructors.
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the grade: Online education in the United States. Needham: Sloan Consortium.
- Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Bejerano, A. R. (2008). The genesis and evolution of online degree programs: who are they for and what have we lost along the way? Communication Education, 57(3), 408–414. CrossRef
- Belisle, C., Rawlings, A. & Van Seventer, C. (2001) The educational multimedia taskforce 1995-2001: Integrated research effort on multimedia education and training. Luxembourg: European Commission. Retrieved from: http://www.cordis.lu/ist/ka3/eat/training_publ.htm.
- Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98–118.
- Chau, P. (2010). Online higher education commodity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(3), 177–191. CrossRef
- Edwards, S. (2010). Teaching through assessment: The merging of technology and assessment in teacher education learning contexts. Paper presented at ACE2010: Digital Diversity Conference, Melbourne.
- Green, N. C., Edwards, H., Wolodko, B., Stewart, C., Brooks, M., & Littledyke, R. (2010). Reconceptualising higher education pedagogy in online learning. Distance Education, 31(3), 257–273. CrossRef
- Grineski, S. (2000). I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore: the commercialization and commodification of teaching and learning in higher education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(1), 19–28. CrossRef
- Hamilton, D., Dahigren, E., Hult, A., Roos, B., & Söderström, T. (2004). When performance is the product: problems in the analysis of online distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 842–855. CrossRef
- Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2006). Authentic tasks online: a synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education, 27(2), 233–247. CrossRef
- Hoskins, B. (2011). Demand, growth, and evolution. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(1), 57–60. CrossRef
- Jaschik, S. (2009). The evidence on online education. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/29/online.
- Lynch, A. (1996). Thought contagion. New York: Basic Books.
- Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: the implication for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–17. CrossRef
- Mayadas, A., Bourne, J., & Bacsich, P. (2009). Online education today. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 49–56.
- McCann, J., & Holt, R. (2009). An exploration of burnout among online university professors. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 97–110.
- Moloney, J. F., & Oakley, B. (2010). Scaling online education: increasing access to higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 55–70.
- Pina, A. A. (2010). Online diploma mills: implications for legitimate distance education. Distance Education, 31(1), 121–126. CrossRef
- Rheingold, H. (2010). Attention and other 21st century social media literacies. Educause Review, 45(5), 14–24.
- Ribsaman, M. (2000). What is distance education? Defining the concepts and terms which have characterized the field. Retrieved from http://www.distance-educator.Com/index1a101600.phtml.
- Saugstad, T. (2002). Educational theory and practice in an Aristotelian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(4), 373–390. CrossRef
- Seaman, I. E., & Allen, J. (2010). Class differences, online education in the United States, 2010. Babson Park: Babson Survey Research Group.
- Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. CrossRef
- Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
- U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American education–Learning powered by technology. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010-execsumm.pdf.
- Waites, T., & Lewis, L. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions 2000-2001. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
- Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77. CrossRef
- Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation
Education and Information Technologies
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Distance learning
- Blended learning
- Web 2.0
- New media
- Virtual learning
- 21st century skills
- Sasha A. Reese (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 571 Greendale Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15218, USA