Comment: Interrogating the neo-pluralist orthodoxy in American anthropology
- Steven L. Rubenstein
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Rarely do I read an essay where I disagree with so many of the parts yet admire the whole. Yet, this is how I felt upon reading Anthony Marcus’s timely essay, “Interrogating the Neo-Pluralist Orthodoxy in American Anthropology.” A good deal of his essay appears to be a critique of a specific article by Akhil Gupta, and for many readers it is his specific critique of Gupta that will have the greatest value. He is, nevertheless, clearly making a larger argument about anthropology, and I therefore will for the most part avoid commenting on his reading or critique of this article. His overall call for a critical reexamination of the anthropology of the state and the need to critically reexamine our engagements with adjunct disciplines is timely and necessary.
Most of my problems with Dr. Marcus’s essay reduce to two points with which I suspect the author would in some way agree. First, in questioning some prominent thinkers’ (e.g., Gupta) positions on the anthropology of the state, he accep
- Abrams, P. 1988. Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. Journal of Historical Sociology 1(1): 58–89. CrossRef
- Almeida Vinueza, J. 2005. The ecuadorian indigenous movement and the Gutiérrez Regime: the traps of multiculturalism. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 28(1): 93–111. CrossRef
- Frankenberg, R. 1990. Village on the border : A social study of religion, politics and football in a North Wales community. Prospect heights, IL: Waveland Press.
- Gledhill, J. 2000. Power and its disguises: Anthropological perspectives on politics. London: Pluto Press.
- Gupta, A. 1995. Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist 22(2): 375–402. CrossRef
- Nadasdy, P. 1999. The politics of TEK: Power and the ‘integration’ of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36(1–2): 1–18.
- Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. 1955 . Preface. In “Preface” to African political systems, ed. M. Fortes, and E.E. Evans-Pritchard. London: Oxford University Press.
- Rubenstein, S.L. 2001. Colonialism, the shuar federation, and the Ecuadorian state. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19(3): 263–293. CrossRef
- Sawyer, S. 1997. The 1992 Indian mobilization of lowland Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives 24(3): 65–82. CrossRef
- Sawyer, S. 2002. Bobbittizing texaco: Dis-membering corporate capital and re-membering the nation in Ecuador. Cultural Anthropology 17(2): 150–180. CrossRef
- Sawyer, S. 2004. Crude chronicles. Indigenous politics, multinational oil, and neoliberalism. in Ecuador. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Trotsky, L. 1904. The Proletariat and the Revolution. http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1918/ourrevo/ch02.htm.
- Vincent, J. 1990. Politics and anthropology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
- Comment: Interrogating the neo-pluralist orthodoxy in American anthropology
Volume 32, Issue 1-2 , pp 97-106
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Steven L. Rubenstein (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- 2. National Humanities Center, 7 Alexander Drive, P. O. Box 12256, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2256, USA