Prone Positioning of Obese Patients for Colonoscopy Results in Shortened Cecal Intubation Times: A Randomized Trial
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer, and colonoscopy can be technically challenging in obese patients. It has been proposed (with little supporting data) that prone positioning of obese patients might facilitate a difficult colonoscopy.
The aim of this study was to determine if starting colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients decreases cecal intubation times.
This was a prospective, randomized study conducted at the North Texas VA Medical Center. Patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to either initial prone positioning or standard, left-lateral positioning. The outcome measurements were cecal intubation time, frequency of repositioning, sedative medications used, reports of pain, complications, and procedure tolerability.
Fifty patients were randomized to have colonoscopy starting in the standard, left-lateral decubitus position, and 51 to the prone position. The average cecal intubation time for the standard group was 550 vs. 424 s in the prone group (p = 0.03). Patient repositioning was used in 28 % of patients in the standard group versus 8 % in the prone group (p = 0.009). There was no difference in subjective reports of pain between groups (p = 0.95) or in average pain scores (p = 0.79). Follow-up interviews were conducted in 93 % of patients, all of whom said that they would be willing to have repeat colonoscopy in the same position.
Performance of colonoscopy in the prone position for obese patients results in significantly shorter cecal intubation times and decreased need for patient repositioning. Prone positioning is well accepted and does not significantly increase procedure-related discomfort.
- Ogden, CL, Carroll, ME, Kit, BK (2012) Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. NCHS Data Brief 82: pp. 1-8
- Moghaddam, AA, Woodward, M, Huxley, R (2007) Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: pp. 2533-2547 CrossRef
- Haggar, FA, Boushey, RP (2009) Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 22: pp. 191-197 CrossRef
- Phillips, KA, Liang, SY, Ladabaum, U (2007) Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care 45: pp. 160-167 CrossRef
- Schreiner, MA, Fennerty, MB (2010) Endoscopy in the obese patient. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 39: pp. 87-97 CrossRef
- Borg, BB, Gupta, NK, Zukerman, GR (2009) Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: pp. 670-675 CrossRef
- Hansel, SL, Prechel, JA, Horn, B (2009) Observational study of the frequency of use and perceived usefulness of ancillary maneuvers to facilitate colonoscopy completion. Dig Liv Dis 41: pp. 812-816 CrossRef
- Roberts-Thomson, IC, Teo, E (2009) Colonoscopy: art or science?. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24: pp. 180-184 CrossRef
- Waye, JD, Yessayan, SA, Lewis, BS (1991) The technique of abdominal pressure in total colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 37: pp. 147-151 CrossRef
- Desormeaux, M, Scicluna, M, Friedland, S (2008) Colonoscopy in obese patients: a growing problem. Gastrointest Endosc 67: pp. AB89 CrossRef
- Silva, AP, Kumarasena, RS, Perera Keragala, SD (2011) The prone 12 o’clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o’clock (standard) position. BMC Gastroenterol 11: pp. 89 CrossRef
- Chutkan, R (2006) Colonoscopy issues related to women. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 16: pp. 153-163 CrossRef
- Tishler, PV, Larkin, EK, Schluchter, MD (2003) Incidence of sleep-disordered breathing in an urban adult population. JAMA 289: pp. 2230-2237 CrossRef
- Chung, SA, Yuan, H, Chung, F (2008) A systemic review of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 107: pp. 1543-1563 CrossRef
- Prone Positioning of Obese Patients for Colonoscopy Results in Shortened Cecal Intubation Times: A Randomized Trial
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume 58, Issue 3 , pp 782-787
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Prone position
- Cecal intubation
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Division of Gastroenterology (111B1), Dallas VA Medical Center, 4500 S. Lancaster Road, Dallas, TX, 75216, USA
- 2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA