Needle Size Has Only a Limited Effect on Outcomes in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Several recent studies have investigated the utility of 19-, 22-, and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) of pancreatic and peri-pancreatic tumors.
The objective of this study was to summarize data from these studies and estimate the effect of needle size on reported outcomes such as accuracy, adequacy, and complications.
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effect of needle size (19, 22, and 25G) on diagnostic accuracy, adequacy, number of needle passes, and complications.
25G appear to confer an advantage in adequacy rates relative to 22G needles (risk difference = 0.12 %, 95 % CI 0.01, 0.25). There was no significant difference in accuracy with an overall sensitivity and specificity for 22G being 0.78 (95 % CI 0.74–0.81) and 1.00 (95 % CI 0.98–1.00) and an overall sensitivity and specificity for 25G being 0.91 (95 % CI 0.87–0.94) and 1.00 (95 % CI 0.97–1.00). There was no difference in number of passes or complications between 25 and 22G. The limited data available regarding 19G needles do not show evidence of improved outcomes with these devices.
In the evaluation of pancreatic and peri-pancreatic lesions by EUS–FNA, 25G needles may confer an advantage in adequacy relative to 22G needles but confer no advantages with respect to accuracy, number of passes, or complications.
- Fabbri, C, Polifemo, AM, Luigiano, C (2011) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: a prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence. Dig Liver Dis 43: pp. 647-652 CrossRef
- Schmidt, RL, Factor, RE, Affolter, KE (2012) Methods specification for diagnostic test accuracy studies in fine-needle aspiration cytology: a survey of reporting practice. Am J Clin Pathol 137: pp. 132-141 CrossRef
- Camellini, L, Carlinfante, G, Azzolini, F (2011) A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy 43: pp. 709-715 CrossRef
- Yusuf, TE, Ho, S, Pavey, DA, Michael, H, Gress, FG (2009) Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy 41: pp. 445-448 CrossRef
- Siddiqui, UD, Rossi, F, Rosenthal, LS, Padda, MS, Murali-Dharan, V, Aslanian, HR (2009) EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc 70: pp. 1093-1097 CrossRef
- Song, TJ, Kim, JH, Lee, SS (2010) The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 105: pp. 1739-1745 CrossRef
- Sakamoto, H, Kitano, M, Komaki, T (2009) Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24: pp. 384-390 CrossRef
- Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H, et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:Article ID 546390.
- Lee, JH, Stewart, J, Ross, WA, Anandasabapathy, S, Xiao, L, Staerkel, G (2009) Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci 54: pp. 2274-2281 CrossRef
- Othman, MO, Raimondo, M (2011) Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: Is a smaller needle safer and better?. Dig Liver Dis 43: pp. 587-588 CrossRef
- Gerke, H (2009) EUS-guided FNA: better samples with smaller needles?. Gastrointest Endosc 70: pp. 1098-1100 CrossRef
- Siddiqui, UD, Aslanian, HR (2011) For EUS-Guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses, bigger is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 106: pp. 801-802 CrossRef
- Yoshinaga, S, Suzuki, H, Oda, I, Saito, Y (2011) Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc 23: pp. 29-33 CrossRef
- Itoi, T, Itokawa, F, Sofuni, A (2005) Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy 37: pp. 362-366 CrossRef
- Leeflang, MM, Deeks, JJ, Gatsonis, C, Bossuyt, PM (2008) Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 149: pp. 889-897
- Deeks JJ, Bossuyt P, Gatsonis C, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2009. http://srdta.cochrane.org/
- Harbord, RM, Whiting, P (2009) Metandi: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J. 9: pp. 211-229
- Higgins, JPT, Thompson, SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21: pp. 1539-1558 CrossRef
- Siddiqui AA, Lyles T, Avula H, Davila R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses in a veteran population: comparison of results with 22- and 25-gauge needles [letter to the editor]. Pancreas. 2010;39:685–686.
- Kida, M, Araki, M, Miyazawa, S (2011) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in the same patients. J Interv Gastroenterol 1: pp. 102-107
- Whiting, PF, Rutjes, AWS, Westwood, ME (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155: pp. 529-536
- Needle Size Has Only a Limited Effect on Outcomes in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume 58, Issue 4 , pp 1026-1034
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- 2. Gastroenterology Division, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East 4R118, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132-2410, USA