Prospective Description of Coughing, Hemodynamic Changes, and Oxygen Desaturation During Endoscopic Sedation
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Deep sedation is increasingly used for endoscopy. The impact of sedation level on hemodynamic status, oxygenation, and aspiration risk is incompletely described.
To describe the incidence of intraprocedural cough, hemodynamic changes, oxygen desaturation, and their relationship to clinical factors and sedation level.
Detailed prospective recordings of hemodynamic changes, oxygen desaturation, and cough during 757 nonemergent endoscopic procedures done under sedation using propofol, midazolam, and/or fentanyl.
Thirteen percent of patients had at least one cough and 3% had prolonged cough. Cough was more common in nonsmokers (P = 0.05), upper endoscopy (P < 0.0001), with propofol (P = 0.0008), longer procedures (P = 0.0001), and hiccups (P = 0.01). The association between supine positioning during colonoscopy and cough approached significance (P = 0.06). Oxygen desaturation was rare (4%) and associated only with deep sedation (P = 0.02). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) dropped by 7.3 and 5.6% respectively. Decreases in systolic BP were more common in whites (P = 0.03), males (P = 0.004), nonsmokers (P = 0.04), during colonoscopy (P < 0.0001), and in patients receiving midazolam and fentanyl (P = 0.01). Heart rate (HR) dropped >20% from baseline in 15% of patients and was more common during colonoscopy (P = 0.002). HR increased >20% in 20% of patients and was more common with coughing (P < 0.0001) and in younger patients (P = 0.0002). No patient required pharmacologic treatment of BP or HR.
We have described procedural predictors of cough that may help clinicians reduce the risk of aspiration during endoscopy. Hemodynamic changes during endoscopy are common but largely clinically insignificant.
- Arrowsmith, JB, Gerstman, BB, Fleischer, DE, Benjamin, SB (1991) Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 37: pp. 421-427 CrossRef
- Froehlich, F, Thorens, J, Schwizer, W, Preisig, M (1997) Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters. Gastrointest Endosc 45: pp. 1-9 CrossRef
- Herman, LL, Kurtz, RC, McKee, KJ, Sun, M, Thaler, HT, Winawer, SJ (1993) Risk factors associated with vasovagal reactions during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 39: pp. 388-391 CrossRef
- McCloy, R (1992) Asleep on the job: sedation and monitoring during endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 192: pp. 97-101 CrossRef
- Sharma, VK, Nguyen, CC, Crowell, MD, Lieberman, DA, Garmo, P, Fleischer, DE (2007) A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 66: pp. 27-34 CrossRef
- Baudet, JS, Diaz-Bethencourt, D, Aviles, J, Aguirre-Jaime, A (2009) Minor adverse events of colonoscopy on ambulatory patients: the impact of moderate sedation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21: pp. 656-661 CrossRef
- Weston, BR, Chadalawada, V, Chalasani, N, Kwo, P (2003) Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients. Am J Gastroenterol 98: pp. 2440-2447 CrossRef
- Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E, et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1229–1237; quiz 1518–1229.
- Ulmer, BJ, Hansen, JJ, Overley, CA, Symms, MR (2003) Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1: pp. 425-432 CrossRef
- Hansen, JJ, Ulmer, BJ, Rex, DK (2004) Technical performance of colonoscopy in patients sedated with nurse-administered propofol. Am J Gastroenterol 99: pp. 52-56 CrossRef
- Rex, DK, Heuss, LT, Walker, JA, Qi, R (2005) Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 129: pp. 1384-1391 CrossRef
- Rex, DK, Overley, C, Kinser, K, Coates, M (2002) Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases. Am J Gastroenterol 97: pp. 1159-1163 CrossRef
- Sipe, BW, Rex, DK, Latinovich, D, Overley, C (2002) Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 55: pp. 815-825 CrossRef
- Fatima, H, DeWitt, J, LeBlanc, J, Sherman, S, McGreevy, K, Imperiale, TF (2008) Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 103: pp. 1649-1656 CrossRef
- Heneghan, S, Myers, J, Fanelli, R, Richardson, W (2009) Society of American gastrointestinal endoscopic surgeons (SAGES) guidelines for office endoscopic services. Surg Endosc 23: pp. 1125-1129 CrossRef
- Agostoni, M, Fanti, L, Gemma, M, Pasculli, N, Beretta, L, Testoni, PA (2011) Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc 74: pp. 266-275 CrossRef
- Kongkam, P, Rerknimitr, R, Punyathavorn, S, Sitthi-Amorn, C (2008) Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17: pp. 291-297
- Vargo, JJ, Zuccaro, G, Dumot, JA, Shermock, KM (2002) Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 123: pp. 8-16 CrossRef
- Seifert, H, Schmitt, TH, Gultekin, T, Caspary, WF, Wehrmann, T (2000) Sedation with propofol plus midazolam versus propofol alone for interventional endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14: pp. 1207-1214 CrossRef
- Bell, GD, Morden, A, Coady, T, Lee, J, Logan, RF (1988) A comparison of diazepam and midazolam as endoscopy premedication assessing changes in ventilation and oxygen saturation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 26: pp. 595-600
- Carlsson, U, Grattidge, P (1995) Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam. Endoscopy 27: pp. 240-243 CrossRef
- Chin, NM, Tai, HY, Chin, MK (1992) Intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Midazolam versus propofol. Singapore Med J 33: pp. 478-480
- Cote GA, Hovis RM, Ansstas MA, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:137–142.
- Ko, CW, Riffle, S, Shapiro, JA, Saunders, MD (2007) Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65: pp. 648-656 CrossRef
- Lee, DW, Chan, AC, Wong, SK, Li, AC, Sze, TS, Chung, SC (2004) The safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: prospective study. Hong Kong Med J 10: pp. 84-88
- Moerman, AT, Foubert, LA, Herregods, LL, Struys, MM (2003) Propofol versus remifentanil for monitored anaesthesia care during colonoscopy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 20: pp. 461-466 CrossRef
- Nelson, DB, McQuaid, KR, Bond, JH, Lieberman, DA, Weiss, DG, Johnston, TK (2002) Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55: pp. 307-314 CrossRef
- Ng, JM, Kong, CF, Nyam, D (2001) Patient-controlled sedation with propofol for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 54: pp. 8-13 CrossRef
- Paspatis, GA, Charoniti, I, Manolaraki, M, Vardas, E (2006) Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 43: pp. 195-199 CrossRef
- Riphaus, A, Gstettenbauer, T, Frenz, MB, Wehrmann, T (2006) Quality of psychomotor recovery after propofol sedation for routine endoscopy: a randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy 38: pp. 677-683 CrossRef
- Sieg, A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach, U, Eisenbach, T (2001) Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 53: pp. 620-627 CrossRef
- Tu, RH, Grewall, P, Leung, JW, Suryaprasad, AG (2006) Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 63: pp. 87-94 CrossRef
- Akcaboy, ZN, Akcaboy, EY, Albayrak, D, Altinoren, B, Dikmen, B, Gogus, N (2006) Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care?. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50: pp. 736-741 CrossRef
- Ciriza de los Rios C, Fernandez Eroles AL, Garcia Menendez L, et al. Sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Analysis of tolerance, complications and cost-effectiveness. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;28:2–9.
- Eckardt, VF, Kanzler, G, Schmitt, T, Eckardt, AJ, Bernhard, G (1999) Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 49: pp. 560-565 CrossRef
- Leslie, K, Tay, T, Neo, E (2006) Intravenous fluid to prevent hypotension in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 34: pp. 316-321
- Tohda, G, Higashi, S, Wakahara, S, Morikawa, M, Sakumoto, H, Kane, T (2006) Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: safe and effective administration by registered nurses supervised by endoscopists. Endoscopy 38: pp. 360-367 CrossRef
- Kulling, D, Fantin, AC, Biro, P, Bauerfeind, P, Fried, M (2001) Safer colonoscopy with patient-controlled analgesia and sedation with propofol and alfentanil. Gastrointest Endosc 54: pp. 1-7 CrossRef
- Vargo, JJ, Holub, JL, Faigel, DO, Lieberman, DA, Eisen, GM (2006) Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24: pp. 955-963 CrossRef
- Yusoff, IF, Raymond, G, Sahai, AV (2004) Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 60: pp. 356-360 CrossRef
- Koshy, G, Nair, S, Norkus, EP, Hertan, HI, Pitchumoni, CS (2000) Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 95: pp. 1476-1479 CrossRef
- Chernik, DA, Gillings, D, Laine, H, Hendler, J (1990) Validity and reliability of the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 10: pp. 244-251 CrossRef
- Glass, PS, Bloom, M, Kearse, L, Rosow, C, Sebel, P, Manberg, P (1997) Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 86: pp. 836-847 CrossRef
- Kanezaki, M, Ebihara, S, Nikkuni, E, Gui, P (2010) Perception of urge-to-cough and dyspnea in healthy smokers with decreased cough reflex sensitivity. Cough 6: pp. 1 CrossRef
- Statement on Granting Privileges to Non Anesthesiologist Practitioners for Personally Administering Deep Sedation or Supervising Deep Sedation by Individuals who are not Anesthesia Professionals. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/publicationsAndServices/~/media/ForMembers/documents/StandardsGuidelinesStmts/GrantingPrivilegestoNonAnesthesiologistPractitionersforPersonallyAdministeringDeepSedation.ashx. Accessed February 17, 2011.
- Revised Hospital Anesthesia Services Interpretive Guidelines—State Operations Manual (SOM) AppendixA. Available at: www.cms.gov/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/downloads/SCLetter10_09.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2011.
- Prospective Description of Coughing, Hemodynamic Changes, and Oxygen Desaturation During Endoscopic Sedation
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume 57, Issue 7 , pp 1899-1907
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Endoscopy, digestive system/adverse effects
- Deep sedation/adverse effects
- Propofol/adverse effects
- Oxygen saturation
- Industry Sectors