EUS and ERCP Complication Rates Are Not Increased in Elderly Patients
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Further studies evaluating the safety of advanced endoscopic procedures in elderly patients are needed.
To evaluate the safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the elderly.
The study population, consisting of 1,000 patients who underwent ERCP or EUS, was divided into two cohorts. The elderly cohort consisted of patients ≥75 years old. The nonelderly cohort consisted of patients <75 years old. The data collected included demographic information, type of procedure completed, procedure medication used, and endoscopic intervention performed. Complications included any event which occurred during the procedure or up to 1 month post procedure.
A total of 600 ERCPs and 400 EUS were included. The mean age of the elderly cohort was 80 years (range 75–95 years, n = 184) versus 54 years (range 13–74 years, n = 816) for the nonelderly cohort. The ERCP complication rate was 10.0% in the elderly versus 10.6% (P = 1.0) for the nonelderly. The EUS complication rate was 4.8% in the elderly versus 3.1% in the nonelderly (P = 0.49). The overall complication rates were identical at 7.6% (P = 1.0). Sedation doses were lower for the elderly cohort (P < 0.001). There was a higher rate of procedure bleeding in the elderly cohort (P = 0.016).
Advanced age is not a contraindication for advanced endoscopic procedures. There is no significant increase in the rate of overall procedure-related complications seen with either ERCP or EUS in elderly patients; however, elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. Less procedure-related sedation medication is required for elderly patients.
- Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Zavos C, Beltsis A, Tzovaras G. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(3):417–423. CrossRef
- Mitchell RM, O’Connor F, Dickey W. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective in patients 90 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36(1):72–74. CrossRef
- Rodriguez-Gonzalez FJ, Naranjo-Rodriguez A, Mata-Tapia I, et al. ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(2):220–225. CrossRef
- Chong VH, Yim HB, Lim CC. ERCP in the elderly: More than just the age factor. Age Ageing. 2006;35(3):322–323; author reply 323.
- Deans GT, Sedman P, Martin DF, et al. Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related? Gut. 1997;41(4):545–548. CrossRef
- Gandolfi L, Rossi A, Vaira D, Tonti R, Ramini R. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the elderly. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1986;49(6):602–607.
- MacMahon M, Walsh TN, Brennan P, Osborne H, Courtney MG. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: A single unit audit. Gerontology. 1993;39(1):28–32. CrossRef
- Rastogi A, Campbell DR. ERCP in the elderly: How safe is it? (marathons, marathon ERCPs, and marathon ERCPs in the elderly). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(7):956–958. CrossRef
- Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(1):1–10. CrossRef
- Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(5):721–731. CrossRef
- Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(5):652–656. CrossRef
- Salminen P, Laine S, Gullichsen R. Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: Analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(9):1965–1970. CrossRef
- Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(13):909–918. CrossRef
- Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(3):383–393. CrossRef
- Freeman ML. Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003;5(2):145–153. CrossRef
- Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2002;2(4):147–168.
- Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, et al. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: A prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008;40(3):204–208. CrossRef
- Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(4):622–629. CrossRef
- Bournet B, Migueres I, Delacroix M, et al. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years’ experience at a referral center. Endoscopy. 2006;38(4):349–354. CrossRef
- Carrara S, Aricidiacono P, Mezzi G, Petrone MC, Boemo C, Testoni PA. Complication rate after EUS-Guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: A large single center experience. J Pancreas. 2008;9:789.
- Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: An inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian study on complications of oral anticoagulant therapy. Lancet. 1996;348(9025):423–428. CrossRef
- Palareti G, Hirsh J, Legnani C, et al. Oral anticoagulation treatment in the elderly: A nested, prospective, case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(4):470–478. CrossRef
- Laupacis A, Boysen G, Connolly S, et al. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(13):1449–1457. CrossRef
- McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(6):910–923. CrossRef
- Rivera R, Antognini JF. Perioperative drug therapy in elderly patients. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(5):1176–1181. CrossRef
- Qureshi WA, Zuckerman MJ, Adler DG, et al. ASGE guideline: Modifications in endoscopic practice for the elderly. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(4):566–569. CrossRef
- Yimcharoen P, Fogel EL, Kovacs RJ, et al. Droperidol, when used for sedation during ERCP, may prolong the QT interval. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(7):979–985. CrossRef
- EUS and ERCP Complication Rates Are Not Increased in Elderly Patients
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume 55, Issue 11 , pp 3278-3283
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- Endoscopic ultrasound
- Complication rates
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, H6/516 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-5124, USA