American Civil Liberties Union2002Insatiable Appetite: The Government’s Demand for New and Unnecessary Powers After September 11.AuthorWashington, DCGoogle Scholar American Civil Liberties Union2003The ACLU in the Courts Since 9/11.AuthorWashington, DCGoogle Scholar Baddeley, S. 1997
GovemmentalityLoader, B.D. eds. The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global RestructuringRoutledgeLondon6496Google Scholar
Birdis, T. (2001). Justice Department asks Congress to clear wide-ranging antiterrorism legislation. The Wall Street Journal (September 19), A4.
Black, D. 1976The Behavior of LawAcademic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar Black, D. 1993The Social Structure of Right and WrongAcademic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar Cohen, S. 1985Visions of Social ControlPolity PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, J.E. (2000a). Editorial Responses, 24 July. Available Online: www.fbi.gov
Collingwood, J.E. (2000b). Editorial Responses, 25 July. Available Online: www.fbi.gov
Collingwood, J.E. (2000c). Editorial Responses, 7 August. Available Online: www.fbi.gov
Deflem, M. 1997
Surveillance and criminal statistics: Historical foundations of governmentalitySarat, A.Silbey, S. eds. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Vol. 17JAI PressGreenwich, CT149184Google Scholar
Deflem, M. eds. 2004Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Criminological Perspectives. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, Vol. 5.Elsevier ScienceOxford, UKGoogle Scholar Dunham, G.S. 2002Carnivore, the FBI’s e-mail surveillance system: Devouring criminals, not privacyFederal Communications Law Journal54543566Google Scholar
Eggen, D. (2002a). Carnivore glitches blamed for FBI woes. Washington Post (May 29), A7.
Eggen, D. (2002b). FBI misused wiretaps, according to memo. Washington Post (October 10), A14.
Electronic Frontier Foundation (2000). “The Fourth Amendment and Carnivore.’’ Statement of The Electronic Frontier Foundation Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary. United States House of Representatives, July 28, 2000. Available Online: www.eef.org
Electronic Frontier Foundation (2003). “Chilling Effects of Anti-Terrorism’’. Available Online: www.eef.org
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2000a). “Congressional Statement on Carnivore Diagnostic Tool, 7/24/00’’. Available online: www.fbi.gov
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2000b). “Congressional Statement on Carnivore Diagnostic Tool, 9/6/00’’. Available online: www.fbi.gov
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2003). “Carnivore Diagnostic Tool’’. Available online: www.fbi.gov
Foucault, M. 1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the PrisonVintage BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar Foucault, M. 1980Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977Pantheon BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar Foucault, M. 1981
‘Omnes et Singulatim’. Towards a criticism of ‘Political reason’McMurrin, S. M. eds. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 2.University of Utah PressSalt Lake City223254Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1991
GovernmentalityBurchell, G.Gordon, C.Miller, P. eds. The Foucault EffectUniversity of Chicago PressChicago87104Google Scholar
Garland, D. 1997‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociologyTheoretical Criminology1173214Google Scholar Gilman, J. 2001Carnivore: The uneasy relationship between the Fourth Amendment and electronic surveillance of internet communicationsCommLaw Conspectus9111129Google Scholar Gooldstein, G., Orr, C.H. 2003Application of the U.S.A. Patriot Act to criminal investigations violates the First and Fourth Amendments.Texas Bar Journal664052Google Scholar Gordon, C. 1991
Governmental rationality: An introductionBurchell, G.Gordon, C.Miller, P. eds. The Foucault EffectUniversity of Chicago PressChicago151Google Scholar
Gugliotta, G. and Krim, J. (2001). Push for increased surveillance worries some. Washington Post (September 25), A4.
Haas, T.C. 2001Carnivore and the Fourth AmendmentConnecticut Law Review34261291Google Scholar Holmes, P.K. 2001FBI’s Carnivore: Is the government eating away our right of privacyRoger Williams University Law Review7247272Google Scholar IIT Research Institute2000Evaluation of Carnivore Diagnostic ToolAuthorChicagoGoogle Scholar
Jackman, T. (2003). Judges uphold US detention of Hamdi. Washington Post (January 9), AI.
Lerner, C.S. 2003The reasonableness of probable causeTexas Law Review819511029Google Scholar Marx, G.T. 1988Undercover: Police Surveillance in America.University of California PressBerkeley, CAGoogle Scholar Marx, G.T. 1998An ethics for the new surveillanceThe Information Society14171185Google Scholar Marx, G.T. 1999
Measuring everything that moves: The new surveillance at workSimpson, I.Simpson, R. eds. The Workplace and Deviance. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 8.JAIGreenwich, CT165189Google Scholar
Marx, G.T. 2002
Technology and social controlSmelser, N.Baltes, P. eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral SciencesPergamonOxford, UK1550615511Google Scholar
Merl, S.R. 2001Internet communication standards for the 21st century: International terrorism must force the U.S. to adopt ‘Carnivore’ and new electronic surveillance standards.Brooklyn Journal of International Law27245284Google Scholar Merton, R.K. 1936The unanticipated consequences of purposive social actionAmerican Sociological Review1894904Google Scholar
O’Harrow, R. (2001). FBI’s Carnivore might target wireless text. Washington Post (August 24), E1.
Rosen, J. (2002). Liberty wins: So far Bush runs into checks and balances in demanding new powers. Washington Post (September 15), Bl.
Scheeres, J. (2001). “Suppression Stifles Some Sites’’. Available online: www.wired.com.
Stanley, J., Steinhardt, B. 2003Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The Growth of an American Surveillance SocietyACLUNew YorkGoogle Scholar
StopCarnivoreNow (2003). “The Backdoor, the Rogue Agent, and the Mishap: The Hidden Dangers of Carnivore’’. Available online: www.stopcarnivore.org
Strauss, A.Y. 2002A constitutional crisis in the digital age: Why the FBI’s ‘Carnivore’ does not defy the Fourth AmendmentCardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal20231258Google Scholar Tountas, S. W. 2003Carnivore: Is the regulation of wireless technology a legally viable option to curtail the growth of cybercrimeWashington University Journal of Law and Policy11351377Google Scholar
Tyson, J. (2003) “How Carnivore Works’’. Available online: www.howthingswork.com United States v. Katz (1967). 389 U.S. 347.
Vlahos, KB. (2001). “FBI Seeking to Wiretap Internet’’. Available online: www.foxnews.com
Voors, M.P. 2003Encryption regulation in the wake of September 11, 2001: Must we protect national security at the expense of the economyFederal Communications Law Journal55331350Google Scholar Walters, R. 2003New modes of governance and the commodification of criminological knowledgeSocial and Legal Studies12526Google Scholar