Date: 25 Oct 2012
Involvement mechanisms for organized crime
- M. Vere van Koppen
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study aims to illuminate the processes that make individuals engage in organized crime activities. Within the diversity of individual involvement processes, several distinctive mechanisms are discussed. Theoretical ideas are illustrated by empirical data on 15 crime groups, including over 300 offenders. The crime groups differ in size, composition, and the nature of criminal activities. Social capital theory is used to understand the dynamical process of becoming involved in organized crime; on the one hand an individual contributes to a crime group, on the other hand the crime group helps an individual reach certain goals. Case studies reveal several resources, such as knowledge, skills, and equipment, that make offenders suit and contribute to a particular organized crime group. Criminal and conventional histories of organized crime offenders turn out to be diverse. Several joint characteristics that opened doors to organized crime opportunities, like running one’s own business, are discussed. It is confirmed that involvement through family and long-time friends is common; most criminal groups contain at least one or two relatives.
The data used in this paper are part of a continuing research project, the Organized Crime Monitor. I am grateful to the members of the Organized Crime Monitor research group, particularly Ruud Kouwenberg and Maïté van Nassou. Special thanks go to Christianne de Poot, Edward Kleemans, Arjan Blokland, and the reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.CrossRef
Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., & Salvanes, K. G. (2005). Why the apple doesn’t fall far: understanding the intergenerational transmission of human capital. The American Economic Review, 95(1), 437–449.CrossRef
Broidy, L. M. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39(1), 9–35.CrossRef
Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage & closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Free Press.
Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1995). Effects of marriage, separation, and children on offending by adult males. In Z. Smith Blau & J. Hagan (Eds.), Delinquency and disrepute in the life course, 4. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Fijnaut, C., Bovenkerk, F., Bruinsma, G., & Van de Bunt, H. (1998). Organized crime in the Netherlands. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Flap, H. (2002). No man is in island: The research programme of a social capital theory. In E. Lazega & O. Favereau (Eds.), Conventions and structures in economic organization: Markets, networks and hierarchies. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Jackson, E. F., Tittle, C. R., & Burke, M. J. (1986). Offence-specific models of the differential association process. Social Problems, 33(4), 335–356.CrossRef
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: A chilling exploration of the criminal mind – from juvenile delinquency to cold-blooded murder. New York: Basic Books.
Kleemans, E. R. (2007). Organized crime, transit crime, and racketeering. In M. Tonry & C. Bijleveld (Eds.), Crime and justice in The Netherlands: Crime and justice: A review of research, 35. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kleemans, E. R., & De Poot, C. J. (2008). Criminal careers in organized crime and social opportunity structure. European Journal of Criminology, 5(1), 69–98.CrossRef
Kleemans, E. R., & Van de Bunt, H. G. (1999). The social embeddedness of organized crime. Transnational organized crime, 5(1), 19–36.CrossRef
Kleemans, E. R., & Van de Bunt, H. G. (2008). Organised crime, occupations and opportunity. Global Crime, 9(3), 185–197.CrossRef
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime & Delinquency, 34(3), 277–306.CrossRef
McCarthy, B., & Hagan, J. (2001). When crime pays: capital, competence, and criminal success. Social Forces, 79(3), 1035–1059.CrossRef
Morselli, C. (2001). Structuring Mr. Nice: entrepreneurial opportunities and brokerage in the cannabis trade. Crime, Law & Social Change, 35, 203–244.CrossRef
Morselli, C. (2009). Inside criminal networks. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Morselli, C., Tremblay, P., & McCarthy, B. (2006). Mentors and criminal achievement. Criminology, 44(1), 17–43.CrossRef
Mortimer, J. T. (1974). Patterns of intergenerational occupational movements: a smallest-space analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(5), 1278–1299.CrossRef
Natarajan, M. (2006). Understanding the structure of a large heroin distribution network: a quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 171–192.CrossRef
Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127.CrossRef
Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (2002). The rational choice implications of control balance theory. In A. R. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges. New York: Routledge.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.CrossRef
Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reuter, P. (1985). The organization of illegal markets: An economic analysis. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
Rubio, M. (1997). Perverse social capital: some evidence from Colombia. Journal of Economic Issues, 31(3), 805–816.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: the salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55(5), 609–627.CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRef
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.CrossRef
Schloenhardt, A. (1999). Organized crime and the business of migrant trafficking. Crime, Law and Social Change, 3, 203–233.CrossRef
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Chicago: J.B. Lippincott.
Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Criminology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.
Thornberry, T. P., Freeman-Gallant, A., Lizotte, A., Krohn, M., & Smith, C. (2003). Linked lives: the intergenerational transmission of antisocial behaviour. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 171–184.CrossRef
Tittle, R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Boulder: Westview.
Uphoff, N. (1999). Understanding social capital: Learning from the analysis and experience of participation. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction.
Van de Bunt, H. G., & Kleemans, E. R. (2007). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland. Derde rapportage op basis van de Monitor Georganiseerde Criminaliteit [Organized crime in the Netherlands: Third report based on the Organized Crime Monitor (English summary)]. The Hague: WODC.
Van Koppen, M. V., De Poot, C. J., & Blokland, A. A. J. (2010). Comparing criminal careers of organized crime offenders and general offenders. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 356–374.CrossRef
Van Koppen, M. V., De Poot, C. J., Kleemans, E. R., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2010). Criminal trajectories in organized crime. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 102–123.CrossRef
Von Lampe, K., & Johansen, P. (2004). Organized crime and trust: on the conceptualization and empirical relevance of trust in the context of criminal networks. Global Crime, 6, 159–184.CrossRef
Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Wikstrøm, P. O. H. (2004). Crime as alternative: Cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Advances in criminological theory volume 13, Institutions and intentions in the study of crime. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
- Involvement mechanisms for organized crime
Crime, Law and Social Change
Volume 59, Issue 1 , pp 1-20
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- M. Vere van Koppen (1) (2) (3)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 2. Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice, The Hague, The Netherlands
- 3. Faculty of Law, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands