Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Information Processing and Anxiety Sensitivity: Cognitive Vulnerability to Panic Reflected in Interpretation and Memory Biases

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between panic and anxiety sensitivity (AS) has been well established. Further, cognitive theories of panic have received substantial support through demonstrations of cognitive biases toward threatening information. However, past research has produced mixed findings on whether AS is itself associated with biased information processing. To explore this question, the current study examined evidence for and relationships among attention (on a modified Stroop), interpretation (using the Brief Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire), and schematic/memory biases (on Implicit Association Tests) in individuals with high (N = 55) and low (N = 48) AS. Results indicated interpretation and memory biases favoring threat among the high AS group, but no attentional bias. Further, the memory bias was positively related to the interpretation bias and to measures of anxiety and panic, offering the first evidence for a schema potentially related to the development of panic. Findings are discussed regarding implications for cognitive models of vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. with Greenberg, R. I. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II Manual. San Antoino, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. G., Stanley, M. A., Averill, P. M., Baldwin, L. E., & Deagle, E. A., III (1992). Attention and memory for threat in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 619–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1988). A cognitive model of panic attacks. In S. Rachman & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Panic: Psychological perspectives (pp. 71–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Öst, L. G., Breitholtz, E., Koehler, K. A., Westling, B. E., et al. (1997). Misinterpretation of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Borger, S. C., & Enns, M. W. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and emotional disorders: Psychometric studies and their theoretical implications. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 115–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. J., Endler, N. S., Swinson, R. P., & Norton, G. R. (1991). Situations and specific categories associated with clinical and nonclinical panic attacks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 67–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgleish, T., & Watts, F. N. (1990). Biases of attention and memory in disorders of anxiety and depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnell, C. D., & McNally, R. J. (1989). Anxiety sensitivity and history of panic as predictors of response to hyperventilation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 325–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441–1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A., Margraf, J., Davies, S., & Roth, W. T. (1988). Selective processing of threat cues in participants with panic attack. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1992). New Look 3: Reclaiming unconscious cognition. American Psychologist, 47, 766–779.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at Age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holle, C., Neely, J. H., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). The effects of blocked versus random presentation and semantic relatedness of stimulus words on response to a modified Stroop Task among social phobics. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 681–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. F. (1993). False suffocation alarms, spontaneous panics, and related conditions: An integrative hypothesis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 306–317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundh, L. G., Czyzykow, S., & Öst, L. G. (1997). Explicit and implicit memory bias in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1003–1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundh, L. G., Wikstrom, J., Westerlund, J., & Öst, L.-G. (1999). Preattentive bias for emotional information in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 222–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maller, R., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity in 1984 and panic attacks in 1987. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 17, 263–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, R. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for threat words in high- and low-anxiety-sensitive participants. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1990). Psychological approaches to panic disorder: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 403–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1995). Automaticity and the anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 747–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., & Foa, E. B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Hornig, C. D., Hoffman, E. C., & Han, E. M. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and cognitive biases for threat. Behavior Therapy, 30, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., & Kim, E. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 407–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., Louro, C. E., Lukach, B. M., & Kim, E. (1992). Cognitive processing of emotional information in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 143–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, M. W., Pollack, M. H., Penava, S. J., & Zucker, B. G. (1999). Group cognitive-behavior therapy for patients failing to respond to pharmacology for panic disorder: A clinical case series. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 763–770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penava, S. J., Otto, M. W., Maki, K. M., & Pollack, M. H. (1998). Rate of improvement during cognitive-behavioral group treatment for panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 665–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity index manual (2nd Ed.). Worthington, OH: International Diagnostics Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S., Lopatka, C., & Levitt, K. (1988). Experimental analyses of panic: II. Panic patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M. (1996). Information-processing views of panic disorder. In R. M. Rapee (Ed.), Current controversies in the anxiety disorders (pp. 77–93). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S. (1991). Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., & McNally, R. J. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–121). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., Austin, D. W., & Alvarenga, M. E. (2001). Interpretation of ambiguous interoceptive stimuli in panic disorder and nonclinical panic. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V. (1988). Appraisal of the self-schema construct in cognitive models of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 147–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shear, M. K., Brown, T. A., Barlow, D. H., Money, R., Sholomskas, D. E., Woods, S. W., et al. (1997). Multicenter collaborative Panic Disorder Severity Scale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1571–1575.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. H., Conrod, P. J., Gignac, M. L., & Pihl, R. O. (1998). Selective processing biases in anxiety-sensitive men and women. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 105–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, B. A., & Woody, S. (2003). Automatic processing among individuals with spider phobia: Change in implicit fear associations following treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 100–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Telch, M. J., Shermis, M., & Lucas, J. (1989). Anxiety sensitivity: Unitary personality trait or domain-specific appraisals? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 3, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Social phobia: Effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking. Behavior Therapy, 29, 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd Ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (3rd Ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Mohlman, J., & Hong, N. N. (1997). Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 83–114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400400, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904-4400

    Bethany A. Teachman

Authors
  1. Bethany A. Teachman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bethany A. Teachman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teachman, B.A. Information Processing and Anxiety Sensitivity: Cognitive Vulnerability to Panic Reflected in Interpretation and Memory Biases. Cogn Ther Res 29, 479–499 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-0627-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-0627-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation