February 2013, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 65-101,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 06 Oct 2012
Unearthing the Infrastructure: Humans and Sensors in Field-Based Scientific Research
Distributed sensing systems for studying scientific phenomena are critical applications of information technologies. By embedding computational intelligence in the environment of study, sensing systems allow researchers to study phenomena at spatial and temporal scales that were previously impossible to achieve. We present an ethnographic study of field research practices among researchers in the Center for Embedded Networked Sensing (CENS), a National Science Foundation Science & Technology Center devoted to developing wireless sensing systems for scientific and social applications. Using the concepts of boundary objects and trading zones, we trace the processes of collaborative research around sensor technology development and adoption within CENS. Over the 10-year lifespan of CENS, sensor technologies, sensor data, field research methods, and statistical expertise each emerged as boundary objects that were understood differently by the science and technology partners. We illustrate how sensing technologies were incompatible with field-based environmental research until researchers “unearthed” their infrastructures, explicitly reintroducing human skill and expertise into the data collection process and developing new collaborative languages that emphasized building dynamic sensing systems that addressed human needs. In collaborating around a dynamic sensing model, the sensing systems became embedded not in the environment of study, but in the practices of the scientists.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2010). AAAS Review of the NSF Science & Technology Centers Integrative Partnerships (STC) Program, 2000–2009. http://php.aaas.org/programs/centers/capacity/documents/stc_aaas_full_report.pdf
Andersen, A.N., B.D. Hoffmann, W.J. Müller, & A.D. Griffiths (2002). Using Ants as Bioindicators in Land Management: Simplifying Assessment of Ant Community Responses. Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 8–17.CrossRef
Aronova, Elena, Karen S. Baker, & Naomi Oreskes (2010). Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957-Present. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 183–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2010.40.2.183
Arzberger, Peter (2004). Sensors for Environmental Observatories. Report of the NSF sponsored workshop, December 2004, WTEC, Baltimore, MD. http://www.wtec.org/seo/final
Atkins, Dan, et al. (2003). National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyber-infrastructure, Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyber-infrastructure. http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/reports/toc.jsp
Barth, Kai-Henrik (2003). The Politics of Seismology: Nuclear Testing, Arms Control, and the Transformation of a Discipline. Social Studies of Science, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 743–781.CrossRef
Bocking, Stephen (1997). Ecologists and Environmental Politics: A History of Contemporary Ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Borgman, Christine L., Jillian C. Wallis, Matthew S. Mayernik, & Alberto Pepe (2007). Drowning in Data: Digital Library Architecture to Support Scientists’ Use of Embedded Sensor Networks. in JCDL ’07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Vancouver, BC: ACM.
Borgman, Christine L., Jillian C. Wallis, & Matthew S. Mayernik (2012). Who’s got the data? Interdependencies in Science and Technology Collaborations. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9169-z
Bos, N., A. Zimmerman, J. Olson, J. Yew, J. Yerkie, E. Dahl, & G. Olson (2007). From Shared Databases to Communities of Practice: A Taxonomy of Collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 652–672.CrossRef
Bowen, G. Michael & Wolff-Michael Roth (2002). The “Socialization” and Enculturation of Ecologists in Formal and Informal Settings. Electronic Journal of Science Education, vol. 6, no. 3. http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/viewArticle/7680/5447
Bowen, G. Michael & Wolff-Michael Roth (2007). The Practice of Field Ecology: Insights for Science Education. Research in Science Education, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 171–187. http://www.springerlink.com/content/t84w280472t84x7l/fulltext.pdf
Bowker, Geoffrey (1994). Information Mythology and Infrastructure. in Lisa Bud-Frierman (ed) Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business. London: Routledge, pp. 231–247.
Bowker, Geoffrey C. (2000). Biodiversity Datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 643–683.CrossRef
Center for Embedded Networked Sensing (CENS) (2002). University of California, Los Angeles. http://research.cens.ucla.edu/about/cens_proposal.pdf
Clarke, Adele E. (2005). Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Collins, Harry, Robert Evans, & Mike Gorman (2007). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 657–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.003
Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21 st Century Discovery (2007). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/nsf0728.pdf
Dennis, Michael Aaron (2003). Earthly Matters: On the Cold War and the Earth Sciences. Social Studies of Science, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 809–819.CrossRef
Embedded Everywhere: A Research Agenda for Networked Systems of Embedded Computers. (2001). National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C: National Academy Press.
Estrin, Deborah, William Michener, Gregory Bonito, and the workshop participants. (2003). Environmental Cyberinfrastructure Needs for Distributed Sensor Networks: A Report from a National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop. Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Finholt, Thomas A. & Jeremy P. Birnholtz (2006). If We Build It, Will They Come? The Cultural Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure. in William S. Bainbridge & Mihail C. Roco (eds) Managing Nano-Bio-Infocogno Innovations. Berlin: Springer, pp. 89–101.CrossRef
Galison, Peter (1997). Image and Logic: a Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Galison, Peter & Bruce Hevly (eds) (1992). Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Glaser, Barney G. & Anselm L. Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co..
Hackett, E.J., J.N. Parker, D. Conz, D. Rhoten, & A. Parker (2008). Ecology Transformed: NCEAS and Changing Patterns of Ecological Research. in Gary M. Olson, Ann Zimmerman and Nathan Bos (eds) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 277–296. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.131.4995&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Harnessing the Power of Digital Data for Science and Society (2009). January 2009 report of the Interagency Working Group on Digital Data to the National Science and Technology Council. http://www.nitrd.gov/About/Harnessing_Power.aspx
Havskov, Jens & Gerardo Alguacil (2004). Instrumentation in earthquake seismology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Heidorn, P. Bryan, Bharat Mehra, & Mary F. Lokhaiser (2002). Complementary User-Centered Methodologies for Information Seeking and Use: System’s Design in the Biological Information Browsing Environment (BIBE). Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53, no. 14, pp. 1251–1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10168
Hopkin, Michael (2006). Ecology: Spying on nature. Nature, vol. 444, no. 7118, pp. 420–421.CrossRef
Karasti, Helena & Karen S. Baker (2008). Digital Data Practices and the Long Term Ecological Research Program Growing Global. The International Journal of Digital Curation, vol. 3, no. 2. http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/viewFile/86/57
Kohler, Robert E. (2002a). Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kohler, Robert E. (2002b). Place and Practice in Field Biology. History of Science, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 189–210. http://www.shpltd.co.uk/kohler-place-and-practice.pdf
Lawrence, Katherine A. (2006). Walking the tightrope: the balancing acts of a large e-Research project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 385–411.CrossRef
Lee, Charlotte P. (2007). Boundary negotiating artifacts: unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 307–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5
Lofland, J., D. Snow, L. Anderson, & L.H. Lofland (2006). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Lohr, Steve (2010). Smart dust? Not quite, but we’re getting there. New York Times Jan. 31, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/31unboxed.html?ref=technology
Mackenzie, Adrian (2003). These Things Called Systems: Collective Imaginings and Infrastructural Software. Social Studies of Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 365–387.CrossRef
Michener, William K. (2000). Research Design: Translating Ideas to Data. in William K. Michener & James W. Brunt (eds) Ecological Data: Design, Management and Processing. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, pp. 1–24.
Michener, William K. & Robert B. Waide (2008). The Evolution of Collaboration in Ecology: Lessons from the U.S. Long-Term Ecological Research Program. In Gary M. Olson, Ann Zimmerman, & Nathan Bos (eds) Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 297–309.
National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) (2012). NEON Breaks Ground. http://www.neoninc.org/news/neonbreaksground
Nutch, Frank (1996). Gadgets, Gizmos, and Instruments: Science for the Tinkering. Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 214–228.CrossRef
Pennington, Deana D. (2010). The dynamics of material artifacts in collaborative research teams. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 175–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9108-9
Pepe, Alberto & Marko A. Rodriguez (2010). Collaboration in sensor network research: an in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns. Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 687–701.CrossRef
Pollock, Neil & Robin Williams (2010). e-Infrastructures: How Do We Know and Understand Them? Strategic Ethnography and the Biography of Artefacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 521–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9129-4
Porter, J., P. Arzberger, H.W. Braun, P. Bryant, S. Gage, T. Hansen, P. Hanson, C.C. Lin, F.P, Lin, T. Kratz, W. Michener, S. Shapiro, & T. Williams (2005). Wireless Sensor Networks for Ecology. BioScience, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 561–572.CrossRef
Roth, Wolff-Michael & G. Michael Bowen (2001a). Creative Solutions’ and ‘Fibbing Results’: Enculturation in Field Ecology. Social Studies of Science, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 533–556.CrossRef
Roth, Wolff-Michael & G. Michael Bowen (2001b). Of Disciplined Minds and Disciplined Bodies: On Becoming an Ecologist. Qualitative Sociology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 459–481. http://www.springerlink.com/content/g51113n07j8277j7/fulltext.pdf
Spencer, Dimitrina, Ann Zimmerman, & David Abramson (2011). Special Theme: Project Management in E-Science: Challenges and Opportunities. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 155–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011-9140-4
Star, Susan Leigh (2010). This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 601–617.CrossRef
Star, Susan Leigh & James R. Griesemer (1989). Institutional Ecology, Translation, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 387–420.CrossRef
Star, Susan Leigh & Karen Ruhleder (1996). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 111–134.CrossRef
Suchman, Lucy A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-Machine Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Szlavecz, K, A. Terzis, S. Ozer, R. Musaloiu-E., J. Cogan, S. Small, R. Burns, J. Gray, & A. Szalay (2006). Life Under Your Feet: An End-to-End Soil Ecology Sensor Network, Database, Web Server, and Analysis Service. Microsoft Technical Report MSR TR 2006 90. http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?msr_tr_id=MSR-TR-2006-90
Warneke, Brett, Matt Last, Brian Liebowitz, & Kristofer S.J. Pister (2001). Smart Dust: Communicating With a Cubic-Millimeter Computer. Computer, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 44–51.CrossRef
- Unearthing the Infrastructure: Humans and Sensors in Field-Based Scientific Research
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
Volume 22, Issue 1 , pp 65-101
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- boundary objects
- trading zones
- environmental science
- scientific data
- technology driven research
- Industry Sectors