The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic
- Dalibor Roháč
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper analyses the role of the unanimity rule—known as liberum veto—in medieval Poland. We argue that the primary effect of the liberum veto was that it secured religious freedom and established domestic peace in an otherwise deeply divided and fractionalised country. What is more, this institution succeeded in doing so during an era which was characterised by violent religious conflicts and rise of absolutist monarchies throughout the European continent. Even after 1652, when the liberum veto seemed to have practically paralysed the decision-making of Polish-Lithuanian parliament, there were still reasons—related to religious issues—why its use could have been preferable to less inclusive voting rules. It can be argued, however, that the use of unanimity was not warranted in questions related to defence, especially in situations of national emergency, although it is questionable to which extent the sole presence of the liberum veto was susceptible to bring about the demise of the Polish-Lithuanian Republic.
- Allen, R. C. (2003). Progress and poverty in early modern Europe. Economic History Review, 16, 403–443.
- Barry, B. (1965). Political argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Barzel, Y. (1997). Parliament as a wealth-maximizing institution: The right to the residual and the right to vote. International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 455–474. CrossRef
- Barzel, Y., & Kiser, E. (1997). The development and decline of medieval voting institutions: A comparison of England and France. Economic Inquiry, 35, 244–260. CrossRef
- Broadberry, S., & Gupta, B. (2006). The early modern great divergence: Wages, prices and economic development in Europe and Asia, 1500–1800. Economic History Review, 19, 2–31.
- Brzezinski, M. (1998). The struggle for constitutionalism in Poland. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
- Buchanan, J. M. (1951). Knut Wicksell on marginal cost pricing. Southern Economic Journal, 18, 173–178. CrossRef
- Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Calhoun, J. C. (1992). A disquisition on Government. In Ross M. Lence (Ed.), Union and liberty: The political philosophy of John C. Calhoun. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
- Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595. CrossRef
- Davies, N. (1984). God’s playground. A history of Poland (Vol. I). New York: Columbia University Press.
- Elbadawi, I., & Sambanis, N. (2002). How much war will we see?: Explaining the prevalence of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46, 307–334. CrossRef
- Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75–90. CrossRef
- Frost, R. I. (1990). ‘Liberty without licence?’ The failure of polish democratic thought in the seventeenth century. In J. S. Pula & M. B. Biskupski (Eds.), Polish democratic thought from the renaissance to the great emigration: Essays and documents. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Hegre, H., & Sambanis, N. (2006). Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 508–535. CrossRef
- Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1986). Experimental tests of the coase theorem with large bargaining groups. Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 149–171. CrossRef
- Jędruch, J. (1993). Constitutions, elections and legislatures of Poland, 1493–1993. New York: Hippocrene Books.
- Klick, J., & Parisi, F. (2003). The disunity of unanimity. Constitutional Political Economy, 14, 83–94. CrossRef
- Konopczynski, L. (1930). Le liberum veto: Etude sur le développement du principe majoritaire. Paris: Champion.
- Leeson, P. T. (2005). Endogenizing fractionalization. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1, 75–98. CrossRef
- Lukowski, J., & Zawadzki, H. (2006). A concise history of Poland (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Miller, J. (1990). The sixteenth-century roots of the polish democratic tradition. In J. S. Pula & M. B. Biskupski (Eds.), Polish democratic thought from the renaissance to the great emigration: Essays and documents. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Montalvo, J., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. American Economic Review, 95, 796–816. CrossRef
- Mueller, D. C. (1991). Constitutional Rights. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7, 313–333.
- Mueller, D. C. (1996). Constitutional democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pula, J. S., & Biskupski, M. B. (Eds.). (1990). Polish democratic thought from the renaissance to the great emigration: Essays and documents. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Rae, D. W. (1975). The limits of consensual decision. American Political Science Review, 69, 1270–1294. CrossRef
- Rousseau, J.-J. (1772). Considerations on the government of Poland and on its proposed reformation, available at: http://www.constitution.org/jjr/poland.htm.
- Smith, V. L. (1977). The principle of unanimity and voluntary consent in social choice. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1125–1139. CrossRef
- Tiebout, C. (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424. CrossRef
- Vagts, A., & Vagts, D. F. (1979). The balance of power in international law: A history of an idea. American Journal of International Law, 73, 555–580. CrossRef
- van Zanden, J. L. (2004). Estimating early modern economic growth, Mimeo, available at: http://www.iisg.nl/research/jvz-estimating.pdf
- Wicksell, K. (1896). Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
- Zamoyski, A. (1987). The Polish way, a thousand-year history of the Poles and their culture. New York: Hippocrene Books.
- The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic
Constitutional Political Economy
Volume 19, Issue 2 , pp 111-128
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Polish-Lithuanian Republic
- Voting rules
- Religious fractionalisation
- Industry Sectors
- Dalibor Roháč (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. 10446 Armstrong Street, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA