Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 401–412

Inbreeding, heterozygosity and fitness in a reintroduced population of endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus)

  • Penny A. Spiering
  • Micaela Szykman Gunther
  • Michael J. Somers
  • David E. Wildt
  • Michele Walters
  • Amy S. Wilson
  • Jesús E. Maldonado
Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10592-010-0147-z

Cite this article as:
Spiering, P.A., Szykman Gunther, M., Somers, M.J. et al. Conserv Genet (2011) 12: 401. doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0147-z

Abstract

It is crucial to understand the genetic health and implications of inbreeding in wildlife populations, especially of vulnerable species. Using extensive demographic and genetic data, we investigated the relationships among pedigree inbreeding coefficients, metrics of molecular heterozygosity and fitness for a large population of endangered African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in South Africa. Molecular metrics based on 19 microsatellite loci were significantly, but modestly correlated to inbreeding coefficients in this population. Inbred wild dogs with inbreeding coefficients of ≥0.25 and subordinate individuals had shorter lifespans than outbred and dominant contemporaries, suggesting some deleterious effects of inbreeding. However, this trend was confounded by pack-specific effects as many inbred individuals originated from a single large pack. Despite wild dogs being endangered and existing in small populations, findings within our sample population indicated that molecular metrics were not robust predictors in models of fitness based on breeding pack formation, dominance, reproductive success or lifespan of individuals. Nonetheless, our approach has generated a vital database for future comparative studies to examine these relationships over longer periods of time. Such detailed assessments are essential given knowledge that wild canids can be highly vulnerable to inbreeding effects over a few short generations.

Keywords

EndangeredHeterozygosity-fitness correlationInbreedingLifespanLycaon pictus

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Penny A. Spiering
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Micaela Szykman Gunther
    • 2
    • 4
  • Michael J. Somers
    • 3
    • 5
  • David E. Wildt
    • 2
  • Michele Walters
    • 3
    • 6
    • 7
  • Amy S. Wilson
    • 1
  • Jesús E. Maldonado
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Conservation and Evolutionary GeneticsSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological ParkWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Species SurvivalSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological ParkFront RoyalUSA
  3. 3.Centre for Wildlife ManagementUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of WildlifeHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA
  5. 5.Centre for Invasion BiologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  6. 6.Biosystematics Research & Biodiversity Collections DivisionSouth African National Biodiversity InstitutePretoriaSouth Africa
  7. 7.Council for Scientific and Industrial ResearchNatural Resources and the EnvironmentPretoriaSouth Africa