Abstract
Lau and Murnighan’s faultline theory suggests that strong demographic faultlines can undermine cohesion in work teams. A strong faultline splits a team into internally homogeneous but mutually dissimilar subgroups based on demographic characteristics. Social influence processes within these subgroups then lead to the polarization of team members’ attitudes along the divisions imposed by the faultline. However, faultline theory hitherto neglects effects of attitude certainty. Research shows that the certainty with which individuals hold their attitudes affects social influence processes. We extend theoretical faultline research by integrating attitude certainty. For this, we incorporate the interplay of the dynamics of attitude certainty and social influence into a formal model of demographic faultline effects developed by Flache and Mäs. Computational experiments suggest a moderation effect. Demographic faultlines only affect team cohesion if attitude certainty is low. We discuss implications for future research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson RP (1964) Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy. In: Frederiksen N, Gulliksen H (eds) Contributions to mathematical psychology. Rinehart Winston, New York, pp 142–160
Blau PM (1977a) Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press, New York
Blau PM (1977b) A macrosociological theory of social structure. Am J Sociol 83(1):26–54. doi:10.1086/226505
Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(3):7280–7287. doi:10.1073/pnas.082080899
Bordia P, Hobman E, Jones E, Gallois C, Callan VJ (2004) Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. J Bus Psychol 18(4):507–532. doi:10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028449.99127.f7
Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 17(5):475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
Cannella AA, Park JH, Lee HU (2008) Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Acad Manag J 51(4):768–784
Carpenter MA (2002) The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 23(3):275–284. doi:10.1002/smj.226
Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad Manag J 44(3):533–545. doi:10.2307/3069368
Deffuant G, Amblard F, Weisbuch G, Faure T (2002) How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 5(4)
Duncan RB (1972) Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Adm Sci Q 17(3):313–327. doi:10.2307/2392145
Festinger L (1950) Informal social communication. Psychol Rev 57(5):271–282
Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 7(2):117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K (1950) Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Flache A, Mäs M (2008a) How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams. Comput Math Organ Theory 14(1): 23–51. doi:10.1007/s10588-008-9019-1
Flache A, Mäs M (2008b) Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion. Simul Model Pract Theory 16(2):175–191. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.020
Flache A, Torenvlied R (2004) When will they ever make up their minds? The social structure of unstable decision making. J Math Sociol 28(3):171–196. doi:10.1080/00222500490480257
Gross SR, Holtz R, Miller N (1995) Attitude certainty. In: Petty RE, Krosnick JA (eds) Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 215–245
Harrison JR, Lin Z, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1229–1245
Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis and simulation. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 5(3)
Hensley V, Duval S (1976) Some perceptual determinants of perceived similarity, liking, and correctness. J Pers Soc Psychol 34(2):159–168. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.159
Hogg MA, Mullin B (1999) Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In: Abrams D, Hogg MA (eds) Social identity and social cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 249–279
Hogg MA, Turner JC, Davidson B (1990) Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 11(1):77–100. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1101_6
Holtz R (1997) Length of group membership, assumed similarity, and opinion certainty: The dividend for veteran members. J Appl Soc Psychol 27(6):539–555. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00646.x
Holtz R (2003) Intragroup or intergroup attitude projection can increase opinion certainty: Is there classism at college? J Appl Soc Psychol 33(9):1922–1944. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02087.x
Holtz R (2004) Group cohesion attitude projection, and opinion certainty: Beyond interaction. Group Dyn 8(2):112–125. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.112
Holtz R, Miller N (1985) Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. J Pers Soc Psychol 48(4):890–898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.890
Holtz R, Miller N (2001) Intergroup competition attitudinal projection, and opinion certainty: Capitalizing on conflict. Group Process Intergroup Relat 4(1):61–73. doi:10.1177/1368430201041005
Holtz R, Nihiser TH (2008) Relative deprivation attitude contrast projection, and opinion certainty. Group Process Intergroup Relat 11(1):89–114. doi:10.1177/1368430207084848
Insko CA, Murashima F, Saiyadain M (1966) Communicator discrepancy stimulus ambiguity, and influence. J Pers 34(2):262–274. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb01713.x
Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm Sci Q 40(2):256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638
Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Adm Sci Q 44(4):741–763. doi:10.2307/2667054
Jetten J, Hogg MA, Mullin B (2000) Ingroup variability and motivation to reduce subjective uncertainty. Group Dyn 4(2):184–198. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.2.184
Keck SL (1997) Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ Sci 8(2):143–156. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.2.143
Lau DC, Murnighan JK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):325–340. doi:10.2307/259377
Lau DC, Murnighan JK (2005) Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Acad Manag J 48(4):645–659
Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu Rev Sociol 28:143–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117
McGarty C, Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA (1993) The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: The roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. Eur J Soc Psychol 23(1): 17–38. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230103
McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Am Sociol Rev 52(3):370–379. doi:10.2307/2095356
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27:415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Milliken FJ, Martins LL (1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev 21(2):402–433. doi:10.2307/258667
Molleman E (2005) Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities, and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decis Negot 14(3):173–193. doi:10.1007/s10726-005-6490-7
O’Reilly CA III, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP (1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Adm Sci Q 34(1):21–37
Pomerantz EM, Chaiken S, Tordesillas RS (1995) Attitude strength and resistance processes. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(3):408–419. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.408
Sherif M, Hovland CI (1961) Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale studies in attitude and communication, vol 4. Yale University Press, New Haven
Smith ER, Conrey FR (2007) Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 11(1):87–104. doi:10.1177/1088868306294789
Smith JR, Hogg MA, Martin R, Terry DJ (2007) Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. Br J Soc Psychol 46(4):769–792. doi:10.1348/014466606X164439
Smith SM, Fabrigar LR, MacDougall BL, Wiesenthal NL (2008) The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. Eur J Soc Psychol 38(2):280–295. doi:10.1002/ejsp.447
Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations, 2nd edn. Nelson-Hall, Chicago, pp 7–24
Thatcher SMB, Jehn KA, Zanutto E (2003) Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decis Negot 12(3):217–241. doi:10.1023/A:1023325406946
Tsui AS, Egan TD, O’Reilly CA (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Adm Sci Q 37(4):549–579. doi:10.2307/2393472
Turner JC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In: Lawler EJ (ed) Advances in group processes: Theory and research, vol 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 77–122
Turner JC (1991) Social influence. Mapping social psychology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes
van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annu Rev Psychol 58:515–541. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
van Knippenberg A, Wilke H (1988) Social categorization and attitude change. Eur J Soc Psychol 18(5):395–406. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180503
van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89(6):1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences, vol 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wilke H, Young H, Mulders I, de Gilder D (1995) Acceptance of influence in task groups. Soc Psychol Q 58(4):312–320. doi:10.2307/2787131
Williams HM, Meân LJ (2004) Measuring gender composition in work groups: A comparison of existing methods. Organ Res Methods 7(4):456–474. doi:10.1177/1094428104269175
Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res Organ Behav 20:77–140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
During parts of this research the first author was a MSc student at the Graduate School of Behavioural and Social Sciences of the University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Grow, A., Flache, A. How attitude certainty tempers the effects of faultlines in demographically diverse teams. Comput Math Organ Theory 17, 196–224 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9087-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9087-5