Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climatic factors controlling plant sensitivity to warming

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant sensitivity to warming can be expressed as β or the number of days of advance in leafing or flowering events per 1 °C of Mean Annual Temperature (MAT) change. Many local studies demonstrate that β estimates for spring flowering species are usually larger than estimates for plants flowering in summer or fall. Until now, however, neither observational nor experimental estimates of this parameter were considered to be climate or geographically dependent. Here we question this paradigm through reanalysis of observational β estimates and mathematical modeling of the seasonal warming signal. Statistical analysis of a large number of bulk (averaged over species) estimates of β derived from the Pan European Phenology Data network (PEP725) revealed a positive spatial correlation with MAT, as well as a negative correlation with the Seasonal Temperature Range (STR). These spatial correlations of bulk β values as well as interseasonal variability in β were explained using a simple deterministic model of the Thermal Growing Season (TGS). More specifically, we found that the geographic distribution of bulk plant sensitivity to warming as well as the seasonal decline of β were controlled by the seasonal patterns in the warming signal and by average soil thermal properties. Thus, until recently, plants managed to keep pace with climate warming by shifting their leafing and flowering events by the same number of days as the length of the period of weather suitable for their growth. Our model predicts, however, an even greater increase in the TGS for subsequent increases in MAT. Depending on how they interact with other factors such as changes in precipitation and increased temperature variability, these longer thermal growing seasons may not be beneficial for plant growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barichivich J et al (2013) Thermal growing season and timing of biospheric carbon uptake across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob Biogeochem Cycles

  • Chmielewski FM, Rötzer T (2001) Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe. Agric For Meteorol 108:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook BI, Wolkovich EB, Davies TJ, Ault TR, Betancourt JL, Allen JM, Bolmgren K, Cleland EE, Crimmins TM, Kraft NJB, Lancaster LT, Mazer SJ, McCabe GJ, McGill BJ, Parmesan C, Pau S, Regetz J, Salamin N, Schwartz MD, Travers SE (2012) Sensitivity of spring phenology to warming across temporal and spatial climate gradients in two independent databases. Ecosystems 15:1283–1294. doi:10.1007/s10021-012-9584-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter AH, Fitter RSR, Harris ITB, Williamson NM (1995) Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the fl ora of a locality in central England. Funct Ecol 9:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R, Lo K, Lea DW, Medina-Elizade M (2006) Global temperature change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:14288–14293. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606291103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • Jones PD, Parker DE, Osborn TJ, Briffa KR (2013) Global and hemispheric temperature anomalies—land and marine instrumental records. In: Trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. doi:10.3334/CDIAC/cli.002

  • Kasuda T, Archenbach PR (1965) Earth temperature and thermal diffusivity at selected stations in the United States. ASHRAE Trans 71(Part 1)

  • Lugina KM et al (2007) Monthly surface air temperature time series area-averaged over the 30-degree latitudinal belts of the globe, 1881–2005. In: Trends online: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A. doi:10.3334/CDIAC/cli.003.

  • Mazer SJ, Travers SE, Cook BI, Davies TJ, Bolmgren K, Kraft NJB, Salamin N, Inouye DW (2013) Flowering date of taxonomic families predicts phenological sensitivity to temperature: implications for forecasting the effect of climate change on unstudied taxa. Am J Bot 100(7):1381–1397. doi:10.3732/ajb.1200455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel A (2000) Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996. Int J Biometeorol 44:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel A (2003) Plant phenological anomalies in Germany and their relation to air temperature and NAO. Clim Chang 57:243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel A, Fabian P (1999) Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397:659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Yolanda Filella Y, Katarzyna Jatczak K, Finn Måge F, Antonio Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski F-E, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12(10):1969–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB (2008) Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau’s Concord: a community perspective. Ecology 89:332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller DA (2004) Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 85:3289–3301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37(1):17–23. doi:10.2307/2332142, JSTOR 2332142

    Google Scholar 

  • National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (2003) NTCHS Annual Meeting Minutes, January 29–30, 2003, Lincoln, Nebraska. http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/ntchs/minutes/1p03pmin.html

  • Rabenhorst MC (2005) Biologic zero: a soil temperature concept. Wetlands 25:616–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly DJ, Imeson A, Liu C, Menzel A, Rawlins S, Root TL, Seguin B, Tryjanowski P, Hanson CE (2007) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, pp 79–131

  • Sherry RA, Zhou X, Gu S et al (2007) Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert S, Ewert F (2012) Spatio-temporal patterns of phenological development in Germany in relation to temperature and day length. Agric For Meteorol 152(2012):44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks TH, Gorska-Zajaczkowska M, Wojtowicz W, Tryjanowski P (2010) Phenological changes and reduced seasonal synchrony in western Poland. Int J Biometeorol 55:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Tivy J (1996) Biogeography: a study of plants in the ecosphere, Third Edition. Prentice Hall, 472 p

  • Wolkovich EM et al (2012) Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485:494–497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Lapenis.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 2144 kb)

ESM 2

(XLS 91 kb)

ESM 3

(XLS 109 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lapenis, A., Henry, H., Vuille, M. et al. Climatic factors controlling plant sensitivity to warming. Climatic Change 122, 723–734 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1010-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1010-2

Keywords

Navigation