Climatic Change

, Volume 120, Issue 4, pp 771–784

Assessment of the climate preparedness of 30 urban areas in the UK

  • Oliver Heidrich
  • Richard J. Dawson
  • Diana Reckien
  • Claire L. Walsh
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0846-9

Cite this article as:
Heidrich, O., Dawson, R.J., Reckien, D. et al. Climatic Change (2013) 120: 771. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0846-9

Abstract

Cities are increasingly aware of the need to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to changes in weather patterns leading to the production of urban climate change plans. The few existing systematic studies of these plans have focused on either adaptation or mitigation issues, and are typically based on surveys completed by city officials rather than analysis of documented evidence. To gain insight into the status of adaptation and mitigation action across the UK, climate change documents from 30 urban areas (representing ~28 % of the UK’s population) were analysed. An Urban Climate Change Preparedness Score, which could be applied to other urban areas outside the UK, has been devised for comparative analysis. This analysis characterizes progress against (i) Assessment, (ii) Planning, (iii) Action, and (iv) Monitoring, for both adaptation and mitigation. The Preparedness Score allows a quantitative comparison of climate change strategies across the urban areas analysed. This methodology can be transferred to other countries and makes an international comparison of urban areas and their climate change adaptation and mitigation plans possible. We found that all areas acknowledge climate change being a threat and that adaptation and mitigation planning and action is required. However, two urban areas did not have official adaptation or mitigation plans. Typically, mitigation activities across all cities were more advanced than adaptation plans. Emissions reduction targets ranged from 10 %–80 % with differing baselines, timeframes and scopes, for defining and meeting these targets. Similar variability was observed across adaptation plans. Several reasons for these differences are considered, but particularly notable is that a combination of incentives and regulation seem to stimulate more comprehensive strategies and action in many urban areas.

Supplementary material

10584_2013_846_MOESM1_ESM.doc (204 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 204 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Heidrich
    • 1
  • Richard J. Dawson
    • 1
  • Diana Reckien
    • 2
  • Claire L. Walsh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering & Geosciences & Tyndall Centre for Climate Change ResearchNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Center for Research on Environmental DecisionsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA