The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change: A Rational and Behavioral Blend
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Over 250 respondents – graduate students in law and public policy – assessed the risks of climate change and valued climate-change mitigation policies. Many aspects of their behavior were consistent with rational behavior. For example, respondents successfully estimated distributions of temperature increases in Boston by 2100. The median value of best estimates was 1–3 degrees Fahrenheit. In addition, people with higher risk estimates, whether for temperature or related risks (e.g., hurricane intensities) offered more to avoid warming. Median willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid global warming was $0.50/gallon, and 3% of income. And important scope tests (e.g., respondents paid more for bigger accomplishments) were passed. However, significant behavioral propensities also emerged. For example, accessibility of neutral information on global warming boosted risk estimates. Warming projections correlated with estimates for unrelated risks, such as earthquakes and heart attacks. The implied WTP for avoidance was much greater when asked as a percent of income than as a gas tax, a percent thinking bias. Home team betting showed itself; individuals predicting a Bush victory predicted smaller temperature increases. In the climate-change arena, behavioral decision tendencies are like a fun-house mirror: They magnify some estimates and shrink others, but the contours of rational decision rmain recognizable.
- Adams, J.: 1995, Risk, University College London Press, London.
- Aldy, J., Barrett, S. and Stavins, R.: 2003, ‘Thirteen plus one: A comparison of global climate policy architectures’, Climate Policy 3, 373–397. CrossRef
- Alpert, M. and Raiffa, H.: 1982, ‘A progress report on the training of probability assessors’, in Kahneman, D., Slovic P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 294–305.
- Baron, J.: 2006, ‘Thinking about global warming’, Climatic Change, this issue, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9049-y.
- Baron, J., Schulkin, J. and Kunreuther, H.: 1990, ‘Perceived uncertainty and the response to global warming’, unpublished paper at: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron/green.htm.
- Berk, R. and Fovell, R.: 1999, ‘Public perceptions of climate change: A “willingness to pay” assessment’, Climatic Change 41 (3–4), 413–446. CrossRef
- Byrnes, J., Miller, D. and Schafer, W.: 1999, ‘Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 125 (3), 367–383.
- Curry, T.: 2004, Public Awareness of Carbon Capture and Storage: A Survey of Attitudes Toward Climate Change Mitigation, Masters Thesis in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Dunlap, R., Gallup, G. and Gallup, A.: 1993, ‘Results of the health of the planet survey’, Environment 35 (9), 33–39.
- Ellsberg, D.: 1961, ‘Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms’, Quarterley Journal of Economics 75, 643–699. CrossRef
- Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K.: 1994, ‘Gender, race and perception of environmental health risks’, Risk Analysis 14 (6), 1101–1108. CrossRef
- Friedman, M.: 1958, ‘The methodology of positive economics’, Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 3–43.
- Hakes, J. and Viscusi, W. K.: 2004, ‘Dead reckoning: Demographic determinants of the accuracy of mortality risk perceptions’, Risk Analysis 24 (3), 651–664. CrossRef
- IPCC: 2001, Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report, in R. Watson et al. (eds.), (IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001); available at www.ipcc.ch.
- Israel, D. and Levinson, A.: 2004, ‘Willingness-to-pay for environmental quality: Testable empirical implications of the growth and environment literature’, Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 31 (1), article 2.
- Jervis, R.: 1976, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Kahneman, D.: 2002, Nobel Prize Lecture. ‘Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice’, December 8, 2002, Stockholm. See: http://nobelprize.org/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf.
- Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J.: 1992, ‘Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (1), 57–70. CrossRef
- Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47, 263–291. CrossRef
- Kempton, W.: 1991, ‘Lay perspectives on global climate change’, Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 1 (3), 183–208.
- Kempton, W.: 1997, ‘How the public views climate change’, Environment 39 (9), 12–21.
- Laibson, D.: 1997, ‘Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 62 (May), 443–477. CrossRef
- Raiffa, H.: 1968, Decision Analysis, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
- Schelling, T.: 1997, ‘The cost of combating global warming: Facing the tradeoffs’, Foreign Affairs 76 (6), 8–14.
- Stainforth, D. A. et al.: 2005, ‘Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases’, Nature (433/27), 403–406.
- Stewart, R. and Wiener, J.: 2003, Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto, The AEI Press, Washington, D.C.
- Strotz, R.: 1955–56, ‘Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization’, The Review of Economic Studies 23 (3), 165–180. CrossRef
- Sunstein, C.: 2006, ‘The availability heuristic, intuitive cost-benefit analysis and climate change’, Climatic Change, this issue, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9073-y.
- Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1974, ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science 185, 1124–1131.
- Zeckhauser, R., Shearer, G. and Memishian, P.: 1975, ‘Decision analysis for flight in the stratosphere’, Economic and Social Measures of Biologic and Climatic Change, CIAP Monograph 6, Department of Transportation Climatic Impact Assessment Program, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Zeckhauser, R. and Viscusi, W. K.: 1990, ‘Risk within reason’, Science 248 (May 4), 559–564.
- The Perception and Valuation of the Risks of Climate Change: A Rational and Behavioral Blend
Volume 77, Issue 1-2 , pp 151-177
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Cogan Professor of Law & Economics, Harvard Law School, 1575 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
- 2. Ramsey Professor of Political Economy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA