Bridging Political Expectations and Scientific Limitations in Climate Risk Management – On the Uncertain Effects of International Carbon Sink Policies*
- Eva Lövbrand
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Despite great advances in carbon cycle research during the past decade the climatic impact of terrestrial ecosystems is still highly uncertain. Although contemporary studies suggest that the terrestrial biosphere has acted as a net sink to atmospheric carbon during the past two decades, the future role of terrestrial carbon pools is most difficult to foresee. When land use change and forestry activities were included into the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, the requirements for scientific precision increased significantly. At the same time the political expectations of carbon sequestration as climate mitigation strategy added uncertainties of a social kind to the study of land-atmosphere carbon exchange that have been difficult to address by conventional scientific methods. In this paper I explore how the failure to take into account the effects of direct human activity in scientific projections of future terrestrial carbon storage has resulted in a simplified appreciation of the risks embedded in a global carbon sequestration scheme. I argue that the social limits to scientific analysis must be addressed in order to accommodate these risks in future climate governance and to enable continued scientific authority in the international climate regime.
- Beck, U.: 1992, Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publications, London.
- Beck, U.: 1994, ‘The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernisation’, in Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S. (eds.), Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Traditions and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Standford University Press, Standford.
- Beck, U.: 2001, ‘From industrial society to risk society’, in Dryzek, J. S. and Schlosberg, D. (eds.), Debating the Earth. The Environmental Politics Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
- Bolin, B. and Sukumer, R. (eds.): 2000, ‘Global perspective’, in Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J., and Dokken, D. J. (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change, Forestry, A Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A. and Totterdell, I. J.: 2000, ‘Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model’, Nature 409, 184–187.
- Cramer, W., Boneau, A., Woodward, I. F., Prentice, I. C., Betts, R. A., Browkin, V., Cox, P. M., Fisher, V., Foley, J. A., Friend, A. D., Kucharik, C., Lomas, M. R., Rmankutty, N., Sitch, S., Smith, B., White, A. and Young-Molling, C.: 2001, ‘Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: Results from six dynamic global vegetation models’, Global Change Biology 7, 357–373.
- Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravtez, J. R.: 2001, ‘Global risk, uncertainty, and ignorance’, in Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E. (eds.), Global Environmental Risk, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
- Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C. and Brack, D.: 1999, The Kyoto Protocol. A Guide and Assessment, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.
- Gr¨bler, A. and Nakicenovic, N.: 2001, ‘Identifying dangers in an uncertain climate’, Nature 412, 15.
- Hansson, S. O.: 1999, ‘A philosophical perspective on risk’, Ambio 28, 539–542.
- Houghton, R. A.: 2002, ‘Magnitude, distribution and causes of terrestrial carbon sinks and some implications for policy’, Climate Policy 2, 71–88.
- Houghton, R. A.: 2003, ‘Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land management 1850–2000’, Tellus 55B, 378–390.
- IGBP Terrestrial Carbon Working Group: 1998, ‘The terrestrial carbon cycle: Implications for the Kyoto Protocol’, Science 280, 1393–1394.
- Jones, C., Cox, P. and Huntingford, C.: 2003, ‘Uncertainty in climate-carbon cycle projections associated with the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature’, Tellus 55B, 642–648.
- Jones, S.: 2002, ‘Social construtionism and the environment: Through the quagmire’, Global Environmental Change 12, 247–251.
- Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E. (eds.): 2001, Global Environmental Risk, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
- Kauppi, P. and Sedjo, R.: 2001, ‘Technological and economic potential of options to enhance, maintain, and manage biological carbon reservoirs and geo-engineerin’, in Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., and Pan, J. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Marland, G., Fruit, K. and Sedjo, R.: 2001, ‘Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence’, Environmental Science and Policy 4, 259–268.
- Melillo, J. M., Prentice, I. C., Farquar, G. D., Shulze, E.-D. and Sala, O. E.: 1996, ‘Terrestrial biotic responses to environmental change and feedbacks to climate’, in Houghton, J. T., Filho, M. L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A. and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change. Contritbution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Miller, C. A.: 2001, ‘Challenges in the application of science to global affairs’, in Miller, C. A. and Edwards, P. N. (eds.), Changing the Atmosphere. Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, The MIT Press, Cambridge, London.
- Morgan, M. G. and Henrion, M.: 1998, Uncertainty. A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Noble, I. and Scholes, R. J.: 2001, ‘Sinks and the Kyoto Protocol’, Climate Policy 1, 5–25.
- Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Fasham, M. J. R., Goulden, M. L., Heimann, M., Jaramillo, V. J., Kheshgi, H. S., Le Quéré, C., Scholes, R. J., and Wallace, D. W. R.: 2001, ‘The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide’, in Hougthon, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Renn, O.: 1992, ‘Concepts of risk: A classification’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, London.
- Schimel, D. and Manning, M. (eds.): 2003, IPCC Meeting on Current Scientific Understanding of the Processes Affecting Terrestrial Carbon Stocks and Human Influences upon Them, IPCC Working Group 1 Technical Support Unit, NOAA, Boulder.
- Schlamadinger, B. and Marland, G.: 2000, Land Use & Global Climate Change. Forests, Land Management, and the Kyoto Protocol, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, U.S.A.
- Schulze, E.-D., Valentini, R. and Sanz, M.-J.: 2002, ‘The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: Implications of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology’, Global Change Biology 8, 505–518.
- Shackley, S. and Wynne, B.: 1996, ‘Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority’, Science, Technology & Human Values 21(3), 275–302.
- The Social Learning Group, 2001, Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks. A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain, MIT Press, Cambridge, London.
- Van Oene, H., Berendse, F., Persson, T., Harrison, A. F., Schulze, E.-D., Andersen, B. R., Bauer, G. A., Dambrine, E., Högberg, P., Matteucci, G. and Paces, T.: 2000, ‘Model analysis of carbon and nitrogen cycling in Pincea and Fagus forests’, in Schulze, E.-D. (ed.), Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in European Forest Ecosystems, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
- Warrick, R. A., Shugart, H. H., Antonovsky, M. J., Tarrant, J. R. and Tucker, C. J.: 1986, ‘The effects of increased CO2 and climatic change on terrestrial ecosystems’, in Bolin, B., Döös, B. R., Jäger, J. and Warrick, R. A. (eds.), The Greenhouse Effect, Climatic Change, and Ecosystems, Published on behalf of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Wiley & Sons, New York.
- White, A., Cannell, M. G. R. and Friend, A.: 1999, ‘Climate change impacts on ecosystems and the terrestrial carbon sink: a new assessment’, Global Environmental Change 9, S21–S30.
- Wynne, B.: 1992, ‘Uncertainty and environmental learning. Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’, Global Environmental Change 111–127.
- United Nations(UN), 1992, Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNEP/IUC/99/9, Bonn.
- United Nations(UN), 1997, Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNEP/IUC/98/2, Bonn.
- Bridging Political Expectations and Scientific Limitations in Climate Risk Management – On the Uncertain Effects of International Carbon Sink Policies*
Volume 67, Issue 2-3 , pp 449-460
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Eva Lövbrand (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Environmental Science Section, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Kalmar University, SE-391 82, Kalmar, Sweden