Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 1–3

Transferring Protection: Adenosine as the Lone Ranger?

Editorial to: “Remote Cardioprotection by Transfer of Coronary Effluent from Ischemic Preconditioned Rabbit Heart Preserves Mitochondrial Integrity and Function via Adenosine Receptor Activation” by C.H. Leung et al.

Authors

  • Qun Chen
    • Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center)Virginia Commonwealth University
    • Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiology, Pauley Heart Center)Virginia Commonwealth University
    • Department of BiochemistryVirginia Commonwealth University
    • McGuire Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
    • Cardiology Section, Medical Service 111(J)McGuire VA Medical Center
EDITORIAL

DOI: 10.1007/s10557-013-6495-4

Cite this article as:
Chen, Q. & Lesnefsky, E.J. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2014) 28: 1. doi:10.1007/s10557-013-6495-4

Coronary effluent from a heart undergoing brief periods of ischemia and reperfusion that leads to the cytoprotection of ischemic preconditioning decreases injury when administered before ischemia to a second heart; the “transfer of cardioprotection” phenomena [1]. In the current issue of Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, Dr. Leung and colleagues replicate the “transfer of cardioprotection” in an isolated rabbit heart model [2]. The authors hypothesize that increased adenosine content in coronary effluent from the first ischemic preconditioned heart is the key mediator of the protection transferred to the second heart. Four lines of evidence support their hypothesis: (1) the content of adenosine in collected coronary effluent from preconditioned hearts is dramatically increased; (2) the phenomena of “transfer protection” is blocked by a non-selective adenosine receptor inhibitor; (3) direct addition of adenosine into coronary effluent from non-preconditioned hearts provides a similar reduction in infarct size compared to coronary effluent from the preconditioned hearts; (4) mitochondrial function is improved in hearts treated by coronary effluent from preconditioned hearts. They conclude that the “transfer of protection” is mediated by an increased adenosine content in coronary effluent through preservation of mitochondrial integrity.

Activation of adenosine receptors provides solid cardioprotection in experimental hearts following ischemia-reperfusion [24]. Adenosine treatment also tended to improve outcome in a meta-analysis of clinical trials [5], though outcomes did not reach statistical significance [5], mirroring the failure to demonstrate benefit in the largest single trial [6]. Ischemic damage to mitochondria is a key mechanism of cardiac injury during reperfusion [7]. Protection of mitochondria during ischemia decreases cardiac injury during the subsequent reperfusion [8]. In Dr. Leung’s study, perfusion of collected coronary effluent from preconditioned hearts before ischemia improved the mitochondrial function in the recipient heart, supporting the notion that “transfer cardioprotection” is mediated by mitigating mitochondrial damage during ischemia-reperfusion.

Although addition of adenosine into control coronary effluent reduces the infarct size to a similar extent as treatment by coronary effluent from preconditioned hearts, there are different effects on mitochondrial function between these two treatments. Ischemic preconditioning protects mitochondria through inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) [9]. The MPTP is also inhibited in hearts treated by ischemic postconditioning [10, 11]. In the current study, mitochondrial respiration and the integrity of outer mitochondrial membrane are significantly improved in coronary effluent treated hearts. However, pure adenosine treatment improved outer membrane integrity but did not protect the electron transport chain. The adenosine treatment results in a better coupled mitochondrial respiration through an unclear mechanism. These results suggest that adenosine is not the sole substance that induces the transferred protection. Other molecular entities, especially small peptides, may contribute to this protection [12]. The preliminary proteomic study is an exciting step to further clarify the molecular targets in this transfer cardioprotection model [2]. Furthermore, interaction with opioid receptors [13] and other signaling systems, including STAT3 [14, 15] are contributors.

Remote conditioning is a cardio protective strategy achieved by applying cycles of ischemia-reperfusion to a non-cardiac tissue. Although the remote conditioning has major clinical relevance and is currently in clinical trials [1619], the mechanism by which the distant stimuli confer cardioprotection remains unclear. Experimental evidence indicates that adenosine, opioids, bradykinin and small hydrophobic molecules are involved in the remote conditioning-mediated protection [2022]. Remote conditioning appears to reduce Bax protein expression and increase Bcl-2 protein expression thereby reducing the likelihood of mitochondrial outer membrane permeability (MOMP) and activation of programmed cell death [23]. Whether the transfer of coronary effluent will impact the ratio of bcl-2/bax, depleted during ischemia by a mitochondria-dependent mechanism [24], needs to be clarified. Supplementation of adenosine into cardioplegia reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury [25]. Addition of collected coronary effluent form preconditioned hearts may further enhance the cardioprotective effect of cardioplegia. There has been substantial discussion regarding the therapeutic challenge of translating cardioprotective interventions from the basic science laboratory to the clinical realm [26], including the selective activation of adenosine receptors [5]. Perhaps the therapeutic potential of remote conditioning is related to adenosine driven mechanisms [4] acting in concert with other protective mediators that via signaling-induced [26, 27], or perhaps direct therapeutic targeting [28], modulate the mitochondria and the jeopardized myocyte to elicit cardioprotection. Perhaps the “transfer of cardioprotection” approach utilized in the study of Leung and colleagues [2], implied by the disparate mitochondrial responses to the single agent vs. the multi-compound treatment, suggests that complimentary interventions are needed to achieve cardioprotective success in the more complex clinical realm. When The Lone Ranger adenosine rides to the rescue, perhaps the complimentary support of other mediators as Tonto should not be forgotten.

This work was supported by a Scientist Development Grant (11SDG5120011) from the American Heart Association (QC) and the Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (EJL, QC), and the Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013